Romney won AZ by nine points; Trump won in 2016 by three and a half; Biden allegedly won in 2020 by a smidgen. To dispute the claim "AZ is trending blue lately" you'd have to not just reverse those ten thousand votes but reverse them and then multiply by 9 (vs. 2016) or 20 (vs. 2012).
Isn't it true that the entire sum of ballots being questioned is not sufficient to dispute the claim if you trust the 2016 numbers?
Who says I trust the 2016 numbers now? I'm not so sure about historical elections any longer.
Look, there were 34,000 duplicate ballots.
That's means 17,000 people voted twice. In one county.
That is massive, wide scale fraud, and in this one county alone, nearly doubles the margin of victory for Biden.
Since we don't know the tally of those duplicate votes, we can't actually say who really won.
Might have been Trump. Maybe those ballots were a mix and Biden still wins when you remove them. Thing is, we don't know for certain. What we do know is that 17000 people in one county voted twice. That's massive fraud.
Not only that, but 25%-30% of them came in after election day, and there is tons of evidence that people destroyed other evidence on voting computers. Perhaps that might have been evidence that shows a massive late night sirbe of Biden votes? We aren't sure, but they destroyed the data that would have told us. Which is a felony of it's own. So they committed a felony nd destroyed data because there was no fraud to be found? Do you expect people to believe that?
Are you willing to move on past the denial stage and admit that the evidence uncovered suggests that the likely explanation for all this is fraud?
Because even if you claim "there isn't bulletproof evidence to shred any doubt," there is enough SOLID evidence to put together, that it clearly points in the direction of fraud. If at this point you aren't admitting AT LEAST that it looks like there was some considerable fraud, I have to Question your honesty.
Because even if you rule it EVERYTHING ELSE, 17,000 people in one county voted twice. That's fraud, on a large scale. A large enough scale to tip the balance and change the winner.