Sheriffs are elected officialsUh oh, someone is about to lose his job. Can't wait to see how CA reacts to wrong think from one of the enforcers.
Sheriffs are elected officialsUh oh, someone is about to lose his job. Can't wait to see how CA reacts to wrong think from one of the enforcers.
Yea... That's what happens when you make a medical claim about the vaccine without any backing evidence...
Frontline Covid-19 Critical Care
@Covid19Critical
***BREAKING SCANDAL*** FACT: Between 100-200 members of Congress and their families & staffers have been treated with IVM & our I-MASK+ protocol for COVID. NO hospitalizations. Not one of them reported that to the people. Saved themselves & stayed silent as IVM was torched.
Pierre Kory, MD MPA
@PierreKory
Fun fact: Between 100-200 United States Congress Members (plus many of their staffers & family members) with COVID.. were treated by a colleague over the past 15 months with ivermectin & the I-MASK+ protocol at http://flccc.net. None have gone to hospital. Just sayin'
Home
FLCCC is The Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance: Dedicated to COVID prevention & treatment, empowering individuals for better health.covid19criticalcare.com
Minimum evidence standards don't go away just because you don't like the group enforcing them.Good job defending the artificial control of information sharing by fact checkers. I cannot see that ever backfiring.
Minimum evidence standards don't go away just because you don't like the group enforcing them.
Nah, probably just a shareholder in Big Pharma.I know we really shouldn't call names and whatnot, but he honestly comes off as a paid shill or a glowie. Like, hilariously so.
Well, better to say that those are two different arguments. Whether it is wrong, and (if, wrong or not, it is done) what the consequences are.It should not be an argument of percentages - just that it is wrong to require it.