Soon, the german regime will start prosecuting the descendants of the "nazis" they weren't able to sentence because they were too slow.
Look at this fatso. She's grinning. She knows she will get away with assaulting a disabled teacher because said teacher is white. There will be a slap on the wrist for her, the teacher will leave school, and she will have clout and bragging right among her fellow blacks. This will continue until enough whites decide that enough is enough.
It seems unlikely that descendants of Nazis will be prosecuted under current laws, unless they committed crimes within modern statutes. The existing situation relies on a precedent that extends a principle from "committed crimes directly" to " indirect responsibility". The people being prosecuted are still contemporaneous. Your assertion is that western laws will be altered to argue that descendents bear the sins of the fathers in direct crimes.
This is highly inplausible. I think it would be more rational to suggest that a new target, or renewed focus might be those who have benefited from the proceeds of Nazi crimes, in terms of corporations who have continuity with their Nazi era versions, banks and other institutions. This would reflect some of the left wing attempts to extract reparations and justice from present day institutions and governments, and I expect it to be as ineffective as those for the most part.
As far as the kid assaulting her teacher goes. I doubt she will get away with anything. She is being charged with a federal crime with a custodial sentence with clear evidence that is indicting her and anyone collaberating. This is less about some sort of racial issue, and more about how social media is exploiting the young, and corporations are hiding from, and being shielded from,their responsibility for pushing and influencing people.
That said, if you're willing to beat up someone obviously weaker than you in a classroom, and it really was just for "likes", you are probably an immature shithead to begin with, social media be damned.
He isn't dead and the justifications essentially set a precedent that is going to make it all worse.
Tldr: you were pedantic about it and failed to notice that I guess?
You imprison pedos for life or execute them. You don't make any excuses for them.
He didn't set a precedent. The precedent already existed with regards the rape statute. If you could not demonstrate the consent issue correctly, then the conviction for rape could not sustained. The mitigating factors in the remaining sentence don't relate to any precedent setting either, since they aren't going to be exactly the same in other cases.
It is difficult to care much for the ill-formed lecturing of someone who at best, provided an incompetent, inaccurate rendition of the situation in the first place as a bizarre segue from another topic, so you can attempt to save face that way if you like, it doesn't change the reality of your failing.
As I said before, you and I are most likely in agreement that this individual deserved a bullet, or life imprisonment, or at the very least deportation, but I think you have a problem understanding how a legal system works.
Taking into account mitigating factors is not "making excuses", its an established principle that cannot be abandoned on the basis of how much you detest a criminal. It is reasonable to argue that there should a way to create a more serious consequence for this filth of a human, but the Prosecutors failed to do so on the basis of a technicality. Judges exist to interpret things within the scope of a legal system, and should do so without attempting to create new laws, and without emotion.
This is an outcome that must be kept enshrined despite the pressure of politics or popular opinion.