AntiSemitism Bill in the United States

He doesn't come off as a liberal to me, he comes off as a conservative of a more...Ferengi stripe, given his near worship of Friedman's economic 'wisdom
I'm a normal Conservative but I legit have no idea what these clowns want. They're anti-capitalism but anti-Marx, anti-liberalism but pro-weed, anti-Israel but also anti-Ukraine, antisemitic but also anti-Palestine, and anti-women but also anti-Islamic.

Their position just seems to be hardline spite against whatever position progressives are sympathetic for.
 
Calling Jews 'blood cultists'...wow, really ugly look.

The updates definitions of anti-semitism that are being added to the groups restricted from federal funding, which is what is going on.

It's not the anti-1A attack you fools think it is, it's equally applying anti-discrimination criteria to jihadi pawns in US colleges as they would Klansmen trying the same against blacks, instead of bowing to Saudi/Muslim Brotherhood/Iranian influences.
One of their founding stories is baby-murder and using blood to save themselves from this murder.

Blood cult. If your religion sounds like something a Khorne berserker would come up with, its a blood cult.
 
.......you mean the Egyptian slaughter of Jewish babies and smearing lamb blood on their doors?

This is why I hate antisemites. You're not just vicious, you're vicious and ignorant.
Do you act obtuse on purpose for shits and giggles or do you get off from it? No, not the slaughter of jewish babies, the slaughter of EGYPTIAN babies.
Try reading Exodus some time, smoothbrain.
 
One of their founding stories is baby-murder and using blood to save themselves from this murder.

Blood cult. If your religion sounds like something a Khorne berserker would come up with, its a blood cult.


If a guy asks you to let his people go or shit will go wrong and.

1. The rivers turns into blood.

2. you deal with a hoard of frogs

3. every ones ass gets hit with lice.

4. wild animals and flies go berzerk

5. pestilence fucks your live stock.

6. every one gets hit by painful ass boils

7. thunder storms and hail fuck up your country.

8. Locus's fucking wreak your country.

9. You experience 3 days of fucking darkness.

Then after all that crazy ass shit goes down you still wont let these people go....yeah you've kind of lost any sympathy for the whole first born son thing. Personally I would have turned people loose at the whole river of fucking blood thing but that's just me.

But as creepy as that part of the Talmud is, its nice to know that middle easterners remain that stuborn to this freaking day.
 
If a guy asks you to let his people go or shit will go wrong and.

1. The rivers turns into blood.

2. you deal with a hoard of frogs

3. every ones ass gets hit with lice.

4. wild animals and flies go berzerk

5. pestilence fucks your live stock.

6. every one gets hit by painful ass boils

7. thunder storms and hail fuck up your country.

8. Locus's fucking wreak your country.

9. You experience 3 days of fucking darkness.

Then after all that crazy ass shit goes down you still wont let these people go....yeah you've kind of lost any sympathy for the whole first born son thing. Personally I would have turned people loose at the whole river of fucking blood thing but that's just me.

But as creepy as that part of the Talmud is, its nice to know that middle easterners remain that stuborn to this freaking day.
If your religion keeps bringing up blood, sacrifices and blood sacrifices, it's a blood cult. If a religion kept bringing up koolaid it'd be a koolaid cult.
 
Are you so stupid you don’t know there are actually Christian clubs on college campuses? These clubs could get support from the school. Yet that could be jeopardized because some neocons want to virtue signal, with trying to pass an unconstitutional law.
And they are also protected by the very same title in the CRA.
Did you read the Title 6 of the CRA or the act in question?
 
And they are also protected by the very same title in the CRA.
Did you read the Title 6 of the CRA or the act in question?
Are you trolling? Why do you keep bringing up something irrelevant? The civil rights act is a separate document and law we are not talking about it.
 
Are you trolling? Why do you keep bringing up something irrelevant? The civil rights act is a separate document and law we are not talking about it.
Are you?
Are you so stupid you don’t know there are actually Christian clubs on college campuses? These clubs could get support from the school. Yet that could be jeopardized because some neocons want to virtue signal, with trying to pass an unconstitutional law.
If this was going to ban them over the content of the Bible, wouldn't the homophobic parts that are already covered by the same law do it already?
Of course those probably aren't clubs very fond of those parts by all chance.
So either they are total shitlibs who refute "wrong" parts of the Bible and are tolerated because of it, so they will dodge it anyway and besides why are you defending them, or it doesn't apply, in which case why are you making a purely theoretical argument to support peace in tension filled islamo-leftist camp?
Secondly, since when colleges getting federal money is free speech? Why are you defending the "freedom" of leftist run colleges to push whatever ideas they find convenient yet make the taxpayer pay for it?
Do you expect them to be soon taken over by some more acceptable to us political faction which will be pushing their ideas against the preferences of the federal government?
 
Last edited:
Are you trolling? Why do you keep bringing up something irrelevant? The civil rights act is a separate document and law we are not talking about it.
Except.. .it is.
Want me to show you?
In reviewing, investigating, or deciding whether there has been a violation of title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.) on the basis of race, color, or national origin, based on an individual’s actual or perceived shared Jewish ancestry or Jewish ethnic characteristics, the Department of Education shall take into consideration the definition of antisemitism as part of the Department’s assessment of whether the practice was motivated by antisemitic intent.

Oh, should I mention that Trump signed an EO that is an early version of this act? In 2019
 
I'm a normal Conservative but I legit have no idea what these clowns want.
Maybe stop treating them as 'clowns', just because the aren't Reaganite relic's like you, and you'd actually understand the modern GOP's non-geriatric base better.
They're anti-capitalism but anti-Marx,
Incorrect, they are anti-corpo abuses and double standard in workplace politics, anti-off-shoring, and pro-protecting vital industries because of security concerns.

One can be anti-Marx while also being against the Friedman's delusions of a 'free market', and recognize that some areas of society shouldn't be profit driven in pure 'line-go-up' fashion (strategic defense industries for example, like shipyards, cannot be easily quantified under Friedman's ideas).

These people want 'fair market', not 'free market', and that is a difference between the two that the GOP understood in the days of Teddy Roosevelt, before Friedman's poison set in.
anti-liberalism but pro-weed,
Plenty of conservatives I know who smoke weed when they are in legal states, so it really isn't a partisan issue outside conservative prudes who still believe the reefer madness propaganda.

Unfortunately the GOP powers in DC are often among said 'reefer madness' believers.

Also, a number of people who are called 'conservatives' here, or are assumed to be, are actually classical liberals who've simply left the madness of the Dems,
anti-Israel but also anti-Ukraine,
No, this is just a very, very stupid but vocal minority who hold either of those positions because they've either been psy-opped to hell and back, or are closet anti-semites, and with the House Vote to remove Speaker Johnson failing yesterday, the MTG faction has lost all it's effective leverage.
antisemitic but also anti-Palestine,
The part of the GOP, the very small part of it, that actually thinks this way are just the racist leftovers that would have once fought for the Confederacy and family probably were Dems till the Civil Right's Act passed.
and anti-women but also anti-Islamic.
You mean not male feminists, and willing to treat women the same way they treat men.

Many women these days forgot the golden rule applies to them as well, treat men like shit for having a penis, act like being abusive towards men is supposed to be something society is supposed to approve of, and think that they can have everything they want out of life and that anything that gets in the way of that delusion is 'patriarchal oppression'.

While at the same time said women often also try to whiteknight for jihadi's who would rape them the second they got them alone if the women were back in their Islamic home nations.

Modern feminists and jihadi's deserve each other, and we laugh when the conflicting parts of the Left's 'progressive' base go at each other.
Their position just seems to be hardline spite against whatever position progressives are sympathetic for.
Some of them are just contrarians who are easily lead around by the nose of 'do whatever the opposite of what the Dems supposedly want, without much critical thinking', this is true.

However, many in the current non-geriatric GOP have a desire for things that are more Rooseveltian (trust busting, infrastructure repairs/updating, protecting vital domestic industries, protecting workers from corpo abuses), and less Reaganite (Friedman worship made into policy, that Bush Sr. was correct in calling 'voodoo economics'), and that might be what is confusing you.
One of their founding stories is baby-murder and using blood to save themselves from this murder.

Blood cult. If your religion sounds like something a Khorne berserker would come up with, its a blood cult.
...you cannot be serious?

This is the quality of Staff we are going to have on this site?

As well, said story was likely an embellished tale of CO2 gas eruptions from some volcano's in Africa, that mixed with Egyptian sleeping traditions (eldest child slept closest to the floor, so 'first borns' would be the ones mostly suffocated by the CO2 releases that traveled along the ground), so you cannot even blame the Jews for that, even if they think it was divine intervention.

Most of Exodus is embelleshed/telephoned in retelling of a series of natural disasters caused by volcanic activity in the Med and Africa messing with the climate.
 
Every other person with that title here is Staff.

And you don't deny that you are a posting some really stupid shit because of your dislike of Jews.
I'm allowed to dislike anybody I want, free country. ;V Or rather, not a free country at all but whatever. I wish it was one.
 
I'm allowed to dislike anybody I want, free country. ;V Or rather, not a free country at all but whatever. I wish it was one.
People are also allowed to openly call you an antisemitic ass for it, and treat anything you say about Israel or Jews as less than worthless.

Perhaps treating Jews as a 'blood cult' is something you need to rethink and ponder on why you've been instilled with such a bullshit view of things.
 
I'm allowed to dislike anybody I want, free country. ;V Or rather, not a free country at all but whatever. I wish it was one.
So....tell me what is the diffrence between the story of the blood cults in Judaism...and the same story in the Bible
 
People are also allowed to openly call you an antisemitic ass for it, and treat anything you say about Israel or Jews as less than worthless.

Perhaps treating Jews as a 'blood cult' is something you need to rethink and ponder on why you've been instilled with such a bullshit view of things.
Oh please, it's 2024, sneezing in a particular way is probably antisemitic nowadays.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top