Search results for query: *

I honestly think that what's happening there is exactly what they wanted to happen.

Well, I don't agree with that viewpoint. I just think that there needs to be accountability.

Judge says it's okay for a woman to scar a man's face (nearly blinding him) for guessing her age wrong, and calls her a "dedicated, hardworking woman, who posed no risk to the public." Oh, the judge is also a woman, but I'm sure that has nothing to do with it. :sneaky:

Tommy Robinson was arrested a while back for refusing to comply with an unlawful order and finally went to trial, where the police admitted that they made it up and the case was dismissed. "Journalists" mad, naturally.

Classic case of rules for thee, but not for me.

Scotland bans "hate speech" online, retroactively. Also includes retweets.

I'm the OP. You are off topic. Not being able to discuss your religious crap here does not in any way prevent you from discussing it in one of the many other topics about religious crap. Kindly move your discussion about religious crap to one of those threads, or if you're too lazy to look...

Nah, that's just an excuse to turn yet another thread into a religious discussion thread. Y'all have plenty of those already, so I'd appreciate it if this didn't get turned into yet another one.

You guys are getting kinda off topic.

I will never understand this mentality. One would think that Europe would have learned the folly of appeasement already, but apparently they need another lesson.