Hope is the first step to disappointment.The business interests and the righteingers basically wanted Hitler and Stalin to eat each-other.
"these same groups are screaming that the United States has no right to interfere in the internal affairs of Vietnam"To this number you can include early libertarians like Any Rand.
In fact that's quite a clear indication of "isolationism" being a tactical hat various groups put on to shield their own favored actors in geopolitics, and throw away when it comes to fucking up ones they don't like. Same story with modern isolationists.
On the other hand there's also a bunch of interests who would have profited a lot from America not joining the world wars, and those were big supporters of isolationism.And while I disagree on her views that America has profited nothing from the 2 world wars,
Who gives a fuck, when the other side puts on the isolationist hat, the others use it.she had a point, "isolationism" is a favorite term used by liberal/"progressive" globalist smear merchants and their coterie of special Interest groups.
If you think this will make me give a tiniest amount of sympathy to the coterie of special interests of "alternate globalists" you are greatly mistaken.
Do i need to remind you how much i care about this sort of stuff and tell you exactly where you should stick cheeky bullshit like that when trying to join a discussion with me?As to this lady Bowhatsit that advocated for Rand to join the pro-war bandwagon, well:
Wasn't that some hyper-racis movie or something...
Last edited: