Poland's eastern borders if the Whites win the Russian Civil War and if there's no WWI but Russia still eventually has a revolution?

WolfBear

Well-known member
What would Poland's eastern borders be if:

1.The Whites won the Russian Civil War?
2. There's no World War I at all but Russia still eventually experiences a revolution and perhaps even a civil war?

I'm asking about these two scenarios separately because they could produce different answers.

Personally, I think that in the first scenario, the Poles might be capable of getting the same borders that they got in real life simply because of their strength relative to the Russians. I don't think that the White Army would have been particularly stronger than the Red Army was, which in turn would have probably still allowed Poland to conquer the Kresy--unless perhaps the White Army would have stopped at the Curzon Line from the very beginning and built up defensive fortifications there, in which case Polish penetration into the Kresy might be considerably harder than it was in real life.

As for the second scenario, it will probably depend on just how much support Germany and Austria-Hungary will give Poland, which will in turn depend on what Poland's views towards these powers (as well as towards France is going to be) and whether Germany and Austria-Hungary think that they can find better allies in the Poles or in Russian reactionaries. If Russian reactionaries (who will likely inevitably eventually attempt to recapture power in Russia in this TL) agree to abandon Russia's French alliance in exchange for large-scale German and A-H support, then Germany would eagerly throw the Poles under the bus in order to be best friends with the Russian reactionaries. In such a scenario, Poland would be lucky to get all of the territories west of the Curzon Line. If, however, Russian reactionaries refuse to abandon Russia's alliance with France, then Germany will likely support the Poles and any other separatists that it can find on the territory of the former Russian Empire assuming that they are actually willing to cooperate with Germany. In such a scenario, Germany might also pressure A-H to sell or transfer Galicia to Poland in exchange for Poland installing a Hapsburg King (not necessarily the same one who rules over A-H, though--could be a (distant) cousin of his). In such a scenario, I could see Poland having eastern borders roughly similar to what it had in the interwar era (1921-1939) in real life. Ukrainians in eastern Galicia could, of course, want to be a part of an independent Ukraine, but I don't know just how strong Ukrainian separatism in Russia will actually be in this TL. In real life, Ukrainian separatism during the Russian Civil War wasn't too powerful unless it was actually propped up by Polish bayonets, which in turn required Ukrainian territorial concessions to Poland.

Anyway, any thoughts on this?
 
@raharris1973 You might be interested in this question of mine.

An interesting question is whether, in my second scenario here, the Germans will actually support any Polish designs on Lithuania. I suspect not. But I also suspect that the Germans would be very eager to let the Poles use Danzig and, if Latvia is independent, Riga just so long as the Poles will never actually make any pretensions to any German territories. If the Poles ever will do this, then Germany will immediately become extraordinarily hostile towards Poland, no doubt about that.
 
The answer to part 1 depends on how and when the Whites win the war against the Bolsheviks. Can you give us details of how and when it happens, because that would tell us when in the conflict in Ukraine the Bolshevik forces are not a factor.

As for 2 what is the time and scenario for the revolution/civil war in Russia? What are the revolutionary forces? It could well be that there is an intervention to help keep the Czar in power by his cousins.
 
The answer to part 1 depends on how and when the Whites win the war against the Bolsheviks. Can you give us details of how and when it happens, because that would tell us when in the conflict in Ukraine the Bolshevik forces are not a factor.

As for 2 what is the time and scenario for the revolution/civil war in Russia? What are the revolutionary forces? It could well be that there is an intervention to help keep the Czar in power by his cousins.
Let's have Denikin win the Battle of Oryol and subsequently advance to Moscow from there. Even if the Bolsheviks are able to save Moscow by redirecting their forces from St. Petersburg, they subsequently end up losing the latter, thus suffering a huge blow to their war effort and ultimately resulting in them becoming demoralized and eventually losing Moscow as well.

Unlikely since Russia was allied with France. The only way that Germany and A-H would actually be willing to do such an intervention would be if the Russian Tsar, or whichever of his relatives they will sponsor, will permanently and decisively repudiate the Franco-Russian alliance. Else, why not simply sponsor separatists in Russia instead?
 
Let's have Denikin win the Battle of Oryol and subsequently advance to Moscow from there. Even if the Bolsheviks are able to save Moscow by redirecting their forces from St. Petersburg, they subsequently end up losing the latter, thus suffering a huge blow to their war effort and ultimately resulting in them becoming demoralized and eventually losing Moscow as well.
Denikin did win the battle of Orel IOTL. He lost his advance on Moscow because of having to divert troops to deal with threats to his supply base:
But by mid-October, the position of the White armies has noticeably deteriorated. In the rear of the AFSR, the Black Army of Nestor Makhno won the Battle of Peregonovka and advanced some 600 km through the Uman region towards Taganrog, the base of Denikin's headquarters. This forced Denikin to send some of his best troops to the South to parry Makhno's Army, which was also blocking his supply lines. To make matters worse, the Bolsheviks were able to conclude an armistice with Poland and the Ukrainian People's Army, freeing up forces to fight the White Army. Denikin had refused to recognize Poland's and Ukraine's independence, thus destroying any possibility of an alliance against the Reds.

So you'd have to have Denikin recognize Ukraine's independence and same with Poland to have a coordinated battle to defeat the Bolsheviks...but if he did that he might have lost some support within his own camp. If that happened then Poland probably has OTL border, but Ukraine could potentially exist as a country allied to Poland and maybe White Russia.

Unlikely since Russia was allied with France. The only way that Germany and A-H would actually be willing to do such an intervention would be if the Russian Tsar, or whichever of his relatives they will sponsor, will permanently and decisively repudiate the Franco-Russian alliance. Else, why not simply sponsor separatists in Russia instead?
I don't think that is accurate given the relatively positive relationship between Nicholas and Wilhelm prior to WW1. In the previous revolution in 1905 Wilhelm offered support to help his cousin IIRC. As it was in 1905 they even signed a defensive alliance, but neither government endorsed it, so it never went into effect:
Treaty of Björkö - Wikipedia

'Willy' was very close to 'Nicky', that's why:
 
Denikin did win the battle of Orel IOTL. He lost his advance on Moscow because of having to divert troops to deal with threats to his supply base:


So you'd have to have Denikin recognize Ukraine's independence and same with Poland to have a coordinated battle to defeat the Bolsheviks...but if he did that he might have lost some support within his own camp. If that happened then Poland probably has OTL border, but Ukraine could potentially exist as a country allied to Poland and maybe White Russia.


I don't think that is accurate given the relatively positive relationship between Nicholas and Wilhelm prior to WW1. In the previous revolution in 1905 Wilhelm offered support to help his cousin IIRC. As it was in 1905 they even signed a defensive alliance, but neither government endorsed it, so it never went into effect:
Treaty of Björkö - Wikipedia

'Willy' was very close to 'Nicky', that's why:

It says that the Red Army won this Battle:


Denikin would have never recognized Ukraine's independence.

And after the failure of Bjorko, I would presume that Willy knew that Nicky was not to be relied upon and that the French lobby was too strong in Russia. Yes, he tried to avert war in 1914, but the mistrust and suspicion was already there beforehand.
 
It says that the Red Army won this Battle:

This last battle yes, but the reason for that was the quote in my post; the Denikin's forces were fatally weakened by needing to fight in other sectors, so they were stripped of the forces that had allowed them to defeat the Reds up until October.

Denikin would have never recognized Ukraine's independence.
Yeah I figured there would be some wrinkle like that.

And after the failure of Bjorko, I would presume that Willy knew that Nicky was not to be relied upon and that the French lobby was too strong in Russia. Yes, he tried to avert war in 1914, but the mistrust and suspicion was already there beforehand.
Nicky wasn't the problem it was the rest of the government. By intervening in Russia to help Nicky Willy could set up a situation where Nicky is a more absolute monarchy since democratization would have failed to prevent another revolution/civil war.
Mistrust and suspicion? Again the issue wasn't between Willy and Nicky, it was around all the people Nicky depended on to survive in power and I don't think either Emperor realized just how much they'd actually been manipulated or bypassed by the true power holders.
 
This last battle yes, but the reason for that was the quote in my post; the Denikin's forces were fatally weakened by needing to fight in other sectors, so they were stripped of the forces that had allowed them to defeat the Reds up until October.


Yeah I figured there would be some wrinkle like that.


Nicky wasn't the problem it was the rest of the government. By intervening in Russia to help Nicky Willy could set up a situation where Nicky is a more absolute monarchy since democratization would have failed to prevent another revolution/civil war.
Mistrust and suspicion? Again the issue wasn't between Willy and Nicky, it was around all the people Nicky depended on to survive in power and I don't think either Emperor realized just how much they'd actually been manipulated or bypassed by the true power holders.
Yep.

Yep.

Well, again, Nicky is actually going to have to renounce the French alliance. Anything less might simply not be enough for Germany, who might prefer to view separatists as a better insurance policy in Russia if Nicky will stay loyal to France.
 
Well, again, Nicky is actually going to have to renounce the French alliance. Anything less might simply not be enough for Germany, who might prefer to view separatists as a better insurance policy in Russia if Nicky will stay loyal to France.
If the French don't send support or at least as much as Germany then I'd assume if successful a German intervention could be predicated on the threatened government in St. Petersburg agreeing to an alliance with Germany. That way if refused then the Germans can let the situation play out and the French deal with the consequences while of course letting General Nicolai intervene with clandestine support for the opposition.
 
If the French don't send support or at least as much as Germany then I'd assume if successful a German intervention could be predicated on the threatened government in St. Petersburg agreeing to an alliance with Germany. That way if refused then the Germans can let the situation play out and the French deal with the consequences while of course letting General Nicolai intervene with clandestine support for the opposition.

This guy? :


And Yeah, Germany can essentially tell the Russian government--or, alternatively, conservative Russian opposition--that either they get German support at the price of decisively breaking with France or that Germany will completely avoid helping them and instead support any viable separatist movements in Russia that it can find. Poles, Finns, Balts, Ukrainians, Caucasians, et cetera. Heck, maybe even Central Asians!
 
Yes sir.

And Yeah, Germany can essentially tell the Russian government--or, alternatively, conservative Russian opposition--that either they get German support at the price of decisively breaking with France or that Germany will completely avoid helping them and instead support any viable separatist movements in Russia that it can find. Poles, Finns, Balts, Ukrainians, Caucasians, et cetera. Heck, maybe even Central Asians!
They'd probably be a bit more indirect in phrasing, but the meaning would be the same. Of course Russia would only be susceptible if the Russian army couldn't handle it, so they probably have to carefully start supporting those movements to ensure that the conditions were ripe for German intervention first.
 
Yes sir.


They'd probably be a bit more indirect in phrasing, but the meaning would be the same. Of course Russia would only be susceptible if the Russian army couldn't handle it, so they probably have to carefully start supporting those movements to ensure that the conditions were ripe for German intervention first.

Yeah, I would presume that Germany would try making it clear--either overly or subtly--that Germany will give direct military support to any separatist movements on Russian territory that it can find if Russia will not agree to break its French alliance.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top