The Political Problem of Pornography

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
Good, then. As what I have been saying, my main point in all of this is to discuss what is true. I did not say anything about banning pornography.
You sure have implied it. What else is the logical outcome to implying this man killed people because of porn addiction?

We all know that the mainstream media's take on this is Asian hate and racism. We need to point out the truth.
And we've all seen how they've blamed white supremacy for it when it's been done almost entirely by black people, so this guy blaming porn is going to do exactly jack and shit to that narrative.
 

Fleiur

Well-known member
His excuse, more like. Just another way in which he is refusing to take responsibility for his own actions. How is it any different from some terrorist blaming Charlie Hebdo for making drawings of Mohamed? Or the Son of Sam claiming the devil made him do it?
No. His motivation, you know, why he did what he did. Because we need to address and discuss the truth, not faux Asian hate and default racism.
 

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
No. His motivation, you know, why he did what he did. Because we need to address and discuss the truth, not faux Asian hate and default racism.
His claimed motivation, which is nothing more than an excuse and a sign that he refuses to take responsibility for his actions. He is no different from that Muslim who shot up a gay dance club, which was incidentally for much the same reason.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
The problem, as @Abhorsen has said, is that there's a gulf between "bad for you" and "so bad for you the government has no choice but to step in and protect you from yourself", and I don't see how porn crosses that line, or how that line could be redrawn without giving the government power it must not be allowed to have.
Because of how it’s an extremely available supernormal stimuli preying on one of your top biological drives that’s extremely easy to access and warps your sexual drive and sexuality into depravity that the average age of exposure to is 11. If that isn’t impacting the general welfare than nothing is.

I disagree. I see it as the same damn issue we've been dealing with since the onset of human civilization; you are offended by this thing, and therefor we must eradicate said thing. Everything else you've been spewing is just an excuse to justify your base desire for power over others.
it’s not offense that makes me want to eradicate it. It’s that it’s not good and it makes society produce weak men and has a severe impact on our longevity and our sexual well being and health. Like half of trannies are trannies because of porn and/or autism and the two playing together. It fucks people up and produces and breeds rampant degeneracy in the population.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
:rolleyes: Porn cannot prey on anything. If someone gets obsessed with it, they only have their own lack of self-control to blame.
Yeah ignore the hollowed out economies in Appalachia and how that relates to their opioid epidemic tied in no small part to the healthcare industry and over prescription of opioids, as well as all the other faults in modern society giving people a lack of purpose or meaning or motivation, it’s all the hicks fault, and they should just be better.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Because of how it’s an extremely available supernormal stimuli preying on one of your top biological drives that’s extremely easy to access and warps your sexual drive and sexuality into depravity that the average age of exposure to is 11.


it’s not offense that makes me want to eradicate it. It’s that it’s not good and it makes society produce weak men and has a severe impact on our longevity and our sexual well being and health. Like half of trannies are trannies because of porn and/or autism and the two playing together.
It is offense, and you're just trying to dress it up to make it seem more justifiable; so either you're lying to us, or to yourself. Either way, I know you're wrong, so trying to bullshit me into going along with your nonsense isn't going to work.



Right, because those peddling the drugs have no blame. :rolleyes:
So I can assume then that you also want to ban liquor stores, right? Because they "peddle", as alcohol is an addictive psychoactive drug.
 

DocSolarisReich

Esoteric Spaceman
Porn is not a drug, no matter how much you might want it to be. You're also talking to someone who wants to end the failed "War on Drugs," so you're wasting your breath in any case.

Sure, let's legalize all the drugs, including pornography, but make getting them at least as difficult as buying a 6-pack of sex in a canoe beer.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
Porn is not a drug, no matter how much you might want it to be. You're also talking to someone who wants to end the failed "War on Drugs," so you're wasting your breath in any case.
It operates on the same chemicals as many drugs, dopamine and serotonin and is tied to one of your strongest biological drives. It’s tied to one of the reasons that the constitution was made, the general welfare of the public.
 

FriedCFour

PunishedCFour
Founder
It is offense, and you're just trying to dress it up to make it seem more justifiable; so either you're lying to us, or to yourself. Either way, I know you're wrong, so trying to bullshit me into going along with your nonsense isn't going to work.
You only defend porn because you are an addict and if you deny it you’re lying to us and yourself. Either way, I know you’re wrong so I’m not going to go along with your nonsense.
 

Fleiur

Well-known member
You sure have implied it. What else is the logical outcome to implying this man killed people because of porn addiction?
Implying? I'm reiterating what happened.
Like I said, that should be the main takeaway.

And we've all seen how they've blamed white supremacy for it when it's been done almost entirely by black people, so this guy blaming porn is going to do exactly jack and shit to that narrative.
Yeah, but at least we say what is the truth. And that goes a long way.
 

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
Implying? I'm reiterating what happened.
Like I said, that should be the main takeaway.
You are reiterating this crazy man's delusions and trying to convince others to give credence to his excuse

Yeah, but at least we say what is the truth. And that goes a long way.
The truth is that this was a crazy man, and it seems like the truth is mattering about as much to you as it does to the leftists claiming all these black men attacking Asians are examples of white supremacy.
 

DocSolarisReich

Esoteric Spaceman
Your ancestors did greater things when it was harder to see tits. It’s not tits that are the scourge but the hyper inflation applied to the value of tits. I want to increase scarcity and increase subsequent value of each pair.

How about this compromise? Age 21 to buy booze, cocaine, pron, and tobacco, and a capital felony for selling to under 21s, but legalized prostitution?
 

DocSolarisReich

Esoteric Spaceman
No. Age 18 is an adult, and it is already a crime to sell any of that to anyone under 18.

Also, my ancestors were not nearly as hung up on tits are you are.

Nope. 21 is the age of legal majority. Always has been. Until then you are the responsibility of your father or the master who has taken you as apprentice.
 

Fleiur

Well-known member
You are reiterating this crazy man's delusions and trying to convince others to give credence to his excuse


The truth is that this was a crazy man, and it seems like the truth is mattering about as much to you as it does to the leftists claiming all these black men attacking Asians are examples of white supremacy.
What made him that? What is the root cause?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top