It's funny to see someone who advocates banning porn complain about how unfree the US is right now.
I've been pretty consistant on my free speech position, including porn.
It's funny to see someone who advocates banning porn complain about how unfree the US is right now.
Do you think if people didn’t have access to Netflix, Uber eats, pornhub, etc that the lockdown would have been able to be enacted?I've been pretty consistant on my free speech position, including porn.
Do you think if people didn’t have access to Netflix, Uber eats, pornhub, etc that the lockdown would have been able to be enacted?
I think you underestimate how much being able to stuff people with comfort plays into being okay with the fundamental aspects of their rights being completely trampled on.Though there would have been 5% more rioting.
As previous rulers and empires have noted, people can live without dignity or without basic needs being met. However, if both is taken away, then you have a nasty situation brewing real quick.I think you underestimate how much being able to stuff people with comfort plays into being okay with the fundamental aspects of their rights being completely trampled on.
In the US, it's still unconstitutional. The obscenity exemption is a hole that will always be just too small to put anything through, and putting a type of tax on a type of speech is blatantly unconstitutional.I'm not entirely sold on the viability of operation "back to the 90s" and its attempt to ban all porn that's not behind a paywall, but he's right in that it's probably more politically viable than a total ban. I just don't know if it's viable enough to actually pass.
Doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t be tried, unless you have a better idea?In the US, it's still unconstitutional. The obscenity exemption is a hole that will always be just too small to put anything through, and putting a type of tax on a type of speech is blatantly unconstitutional.
Yeah, my better idea would be to not try to ban it at all.Doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t be tried, unless you have a better idea?
In the US, it's still unconstitutional. The obscenity exemption is a hole that will always be just too small to put anything through, and putting a type of tax on a type of speech is blatantly unconstitutional.
In the US, it's still unconstitutional. The obscenity exemption is a hole that will always be just too small to put anything through, and putting a type of tax on a type of speech is blatantly unconstitutional.
Also it would be a bad idea, Porn companies have the most insitutional knowlege of how to beat censorship in this country that is a useful ally to have in this political enviornment.
Hopefully we can get judges who will widen that hole.In the US, it's still unconstitutional. The obscenity exemption is a hole that will always be just too small to put anything through, and putting a type of tax on a type of speech is blatantly unconstitutional.
No, the dissident right has the most lol. Porn doesn’t have hardly anything. Porn doesn’t do much at all to get around censorship, it’s heavily and actively promoted by the liberal regime.Also it would be a bad idea, Porn companies have the most insitutional knowlege of how to beat censorship in this country that is a useful ally to have in this political enviornment.
No, they very much do still have a staggering amount of institutional experience in such dodging because the financial system still doesn't like them, and they're subject to a ton of top-heat crimes so they need to be on their toes ready to bolt in ways basically nobody else does, at least in the United States. A teen lying about her age doesn't get SWAT teams in 24 hours for normal businesses. And the meatspace studios have a lot left over from the 80s and earlier when the "Moral Majority" types weren't joking.No, the dissident right has the most lol. Porn doesn’t have hardly anything. Porn doesn’t do much at all to get around censorship, it’s heavily and actively promoted by the liberal regime.
Don't impose morality on others? I'm not in favor of it even if it were constitutional. And it's a very bad idea to be pro any kind of censorship when fighting against a block that uses censorship. Every win you get will be used against you, and all that effort will counteract the progress you've made for free speech elsewhere.Doesn’t mean that it shouldn’t be tried, unless you have a better idea?
It's a good thing there's no will. The less censorious the better.There's probably a way (there already is some limit, since you have to pinky swear you're 18 when you visit porn sites, but don't have to do that elsewhere), the issue is theres no will.
If you also want them to take similarly large holes in the 2nd amendment and the rest of the first amendment, sure.Hopefully we can get judges who will widen that hole.
And that you think this makes me even more confident that the right won't ever come up with a solution.No, the dissident right has the most lol. Porn doesn’t have hardly anything. Porn doesn’t do much at all to get around censorship, it’s heavily and actively promoted by the liberal regime.
Is the momentary pleasure you get in return for unhealthy self-indulge worth that much to you?Yeah, my better idea would be to not try to ban it at all.
Don't impose morality on others? I'm not in favor of it even if it were constitutional. And it's a very bad idea to be pro any kind of censorship when fighting against a block that uses censorship. Every win you get will be used against you, and all that effort will counteract the progress you've made for free speech elsewhere.
The moral high ground is 100% about what this fight is all about. Leftists try to take it by calling others racist, we take it back by appealing to American values. And censorship has never been one.You think the moral high ground really matters a damn anymore?!
As for it being ‘unconstitutional’ I’m fairly certain the Founders has higher ideals in mind there. Not even they could have imagined how bad things have gotten.
And I fail to imagine that such a law, IT crafted carefully and specifically would backfire. Especially if it’s done to restrain who can produce pornography, which can be posted online. Trying to take down all the porn-YouTube’s out there is probably a futile goal. However, there can be ways to mitigate the issue...
Huh. I wonder if it would even be legal for them to use the same algorithms? Because the algorithms machine learning uses operate on a shitton of data, so you'd need every company trying to write an algorithm to have gigs and gigs of child porn to run tests against to train.The primary distributors of CP are twitter and facebook, look how much effort they put into not dealing with that when they literally spend millions on stopping you from sending rude messages, and just try to imagine how it would go if you tried to make some laws about normal porn.