Hmm reminds me of how the democrats ever escalating use of violence and force led to the last civil war we had....
United States George Floyd Protests, Reactions and Riots
- Thread starter Urabrask Revealed
- Start date
Hmm reminds me of how the democrats ever escalating use of violence and force led to the last civil war we had....
He's been charged in that there will be a trial. Not found guilty of a felony.
DarthOne
☦️
Judge Lets Black Lives Matter Thug Walk Free For Attacking A Baby, Says: ‘He Was Emotional’
worthypolitics.com
Fucking hell...
OUTRAGEOUS! THIS IS NOT AMERICA ANYMORE... BREAKING NEWS: Judge Lets Black Lives Matter Thug W...
HORRIFIC!
worthypolitics.com
Fucking hell...
Megadeath
Well-known member
The particulars are somewhat slanted by that reporting. For one, he likely never knew a baby was there. He was part of a crowd that had been tear gassed, and his attack on the car was a reaction to being clipped by the car after it attempted to push through the crowd.Judge Lets Black Lives Matter Thug Walk Free For Attacking A Baby, Says: ‘He Was Emotional’
OUTRAGEOUS! THIS IS NOT AMERICA ANYMORE... BREAKING NEWS: Judge Lets Black Lives Matter Thug W...
HORRIFIC!
Fucking hell...
That said, I personally would want him to face significantly more stiff consequences and don't really agree with the outcome. On the other hand, I'd also consider the driver guilty of reckless endangerment for taking the car into the middle of a tear gassed riot.
Unless the family are idiots they are going to win an open and shut civil case against this guy.
So it's likely not over yet.
What's the sitch?
Well-known member
It would have looked bad to have a black person have murdered someone while the Chauvin "trial" going on.
In which innocent black person that was a shining pillar of the community and exemplar of mankind was brutally murdered for no apparent reason by a police officer. /sarcasm
In which innocent black person that was a shining pillar of the community and exemplar of mankind was brutally murdered for no apparent reason by a police officer. /sarcasm
Megadeath
Well-known member
Legally speaking, it doesn't matter whether the person you murder is a satanic cannibalistic paedophile, or the second coming of Christ.
Legally speaking the right to self defense has been enuciated by such people as Cirero and has been reconized as a right that human beings have in mulitple societies and civilization.
Western civilization, Arab civilization, The far eastern, indian, and new world civilizations all reconized self defense as a right that human beings intrinsically possess. So if the Satanic Cannibalistic Paedophile starts trouble and dies for it then that's covered by self defense.
AnimalNoodles
Well-known member
I keep telling people that in time you will see an explosion of white gangs, and these gangs will protect neighbourhoods in exchange for protection money.
it might end up being money well spent.
Megadeath
Well-known member
Of course it is. And if Jesus were to attack the Pharisees, and start trashing shops set up in temples then people would have a right to defend themselves there too. What's your point though? Surely you're not trying to suggest Chauvin killed Floyd in self defence?
AnimalNoodles
Well-known member
Only to the extent that they will do what the cops wont.
The stuff im hearing from a great many white normies would concern me if I wasnt radicalised myself. Mass radicalisation of whites is occurring at a rapid pace. I am hearing stuff from my normie soccermom cousins that would be shocking to me of even 7 years ago.
What we are seeing is the polarisation of Gamergate being applied to the entire culture. The left has all the power, and they will use that power to brutalise their opponents. But if they dont take their foot off the pedal, that growing radicalization will find non-political outlets to express itself.
Terthna
Professional Lurker
Which may be one of the rare times "protection money" isn't just a euphemism for extortion under threat of violence.
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
If you've been tracking the events around the trial, you'd be aware that evidence is that Floyd killed himself. At most, Chauvin contributed by adding stressors when Floyd was already heading towards a death by OD.
Megadeath
Well-known member
That's open to interpretation, and that's clearly not the interpretation the court came to. Regardless, what does that have to do with the legal right to self defense?
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
Chauvin didn't kill Floyd. Floyd killed himself. Thus the right to self-defense isn't relevant to that situation.
And when there's clear evidence both that there was witness tampering, and that one of the jurors is ideologically aligned with a terrorist group, was prejudiced against Chauvin and lied to get into the jury anyways, the findings of the trial are far from authoritative.
King Arts
Well-known member
Is the court trustworthy though? Maybe the witnesses and judge felt that it was necessary to sacrafice Chauvin otherwise there would be more riots.
boomghost
I trust you know where the launch button is?
if people riot over someone ODing on drugs, those people need to be spending some time in jail.