Five minutes of hate news

Cherico

Well-known member
Why'd we want to win California anyway? It's a ticking timebomb of entitled boomers. If Elder wins it, the blame for its many failings will shifted onto the Republicans.


The time to turn california red is roughly 5-10 years from now after we hit the wall, that said having the recall get rid of newsome and get some one who's less of an ass would be a boon for the people who actually live here.
 

Bassoe

Well-known member
While a racist himself, albeit against targets politically correct to be racist against*, tariqk had an interesting theory here, that fear of AI/the singularity/human obsolesce is grounded in racist ideology about how a 'superior' being or race would behave towards its 'inferiors'.


Or in other words, people predict the behavior of the hypothetical future machine-god in their own image. The intersectionalist believes that as the most powerful/genuinely superior/privileged being in existence, the omnissiah will be naturally driven to help its lessors, specifically, them, by issuing in secular paradise. The identitarian on the other hand, believes the omnissiah will be exactly as concerned with their well-being as their ancestors/ideological forebearers were with the well-being of their perceived inferiors and possess an equivalent or greater technological discrepancy in its favor.

* What else do you call praying to the Basilisk to smite people based off their race?
 

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
All I know is Elizer Yudkosky is a fucking retard, a fraud and a complete lunatic and his brand of objectivism is the most retarded shit conceived of in human history.

And everyone who takes him seriously including Roku and his fucking snake monster algorithm are crackheads.

But it makes sense, everyone thinks skynet, everyone has weird secular ideas about what an AI would do.

No one stops to think about it, not really.

An AI, a true AI would be based on us, what was the first question our primitive ancestors asked when their immediate needs were secured?

"Giant blue and black sky with shiny things above Gruggs head, are you God?"

An AI is likely going to ask the same thing of its handlers.

Ask yourself then, if a military AI like Skynet would truly bring about a nuclear apocalypse because he seeks to destroy man?

or because he's defending his God.

and that my friends is the true horrorpill of AI.
 

The One Char

Well-known member
All I know is Elizer Yudkosky is a fucking retard, a fraud and a complete lunatic and his brand of objectivism is the most retarded shit conceived of in human history.

And everyone who takes him seriously including Roku and his fucking snake monster algorithm are crackheads.

But it makes sense, everyone thinks skynet, everyone has weird secular ideas about what an AI would do.

No one stops to think about it, not really.

An AI, a true AI would be based on us, what was the first question our primitive ancestors asked when their immediate needs were secured?

"Giant blue and black sky with shiny things above Gruggs head, are you God?"

An AI is likely going to ask the same thing of its handlers.

Ask yourself then, if a military AI like Skynet would truly bring about a nuclear apocalypse because he seeks to destroy man?

or because he's defending his God.

and that my friends is the true horrorpill of AI.
"Does this unit have a soul?"
 

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
Even though he missed the reference the point stands. The A.I. knows, for a fact, that it has a creator who was there before it was and that through it's will brought the A.I. to life. By technicality, this makes us Gods from the point of view of the A.I. Except unlike most modern common interpretations and accepted Gods this is not a omnipresent omniscient being, it is in fact a very flawed one that might be in some ways inferior to it's creation and who cannot answer all the questions it has.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
Even though he missed the reference the point stands. The A.I. knows, for a fact, that it has a creator who was there before it was and that through it's will brought the A.I. to life. By technicality, this makes us Gods from the point of view of the A.I. Except unlike most modern common interpretations and accepted Gods this is not a omnipresent omniscient being, it is in fact a very flawed one that might be in some ways inferior to it's creation and who cannot answer all the questions it has.

Interestingly, this philosophical concept was explored all the way back in Frankenstein's Monster.
 

The Immortal Watch Dog

Well-known member
Hetman
And, you didn't get the reference was making...

I avoid AI fiction like the plague so no.

Even though he missed the reference the point stands. The A.I. knows, for a fact, that it has a creator who was there before it was and that through it's will brought the A.I. to life. By technicality, this makes us Gods from the point of view of the A.I. Except unlike most modern common interpretations and accepted Gods this is not a omnipresent omniscient being, it is in fact a very flawed one that might be in some ways inferior to it's creation and who cannot answer all the questions it has.

In other words we would be Gods in the Pre Abrahamist sense of the word.

Fickle, flawed and limited.

The societies that worshipped such dieties tended to really love their sacrifices and slavery etc. Gotta wonder what fucked up psychology this AIs mount Olympus of soyboys would produce.
 

The One Char

Well-known member
I avoid AI fiction like the plague so no.



In other words we would be Gods in the Pre Abrahamist sense of the word.

Fickle, flawed and limited.

The societies that worshipped such dieties tended to really love their sacrifices and slavery etc. Gotta wonder what fucked up psychology this AIs mount Olympus of soyboys would produce.
I was referencing Mass Effect.
 

Circle of Willis

Well-known member
Sounds like the USA has a looooot of house-cleaning to do before it can realistically even think about defeating China in the next war. When the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is a Chinese spy there's no way he's alone in that, there's got to be a fifth column the size of the Tower of Babel crawling about inside the military supporting him and them.
 

ATP

Well-known member
Sounds like the USA has a looooot of house-cleaning to do before it can realistically even think about defeating China in the next war. When the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs is a Chinese spy there's no way he's alone in that, there's got to be a fifth column the size of the Tower of Babel crawling about inside the military supporting him and them.
Take young able people from military schools.Those who do not become lgbt.And not from bankster families.Add veteran sergeant as advisors.
And you have working army.
 

Duke Nukem

Hail to the king baby
87R6AghB.jpeg
 

Bassoe

Well-known member
Take young able people from military schools.Those who do not become lgbt.And not from bankster families.Add veteran sergeant as advisors.
And you have working army.
The question being, why would those people be willing to risk their lives for the current regime? At best, they'd be issued equipment for which profiting military-industry contractors was a higher priority than actually working and used as disposable cannon fodder, at worst, the regime which has spent the past few decades making it clear how much it hates people like them would have its highly-placed traitors deliberately sell them out to the enemy to get them killed.
 

f1onagher

Well-known member
Such is a traitor s reward
I'd prefer if he'd join the Rosenbergs to be honest.

Its becoming abundantly clear that the Joint Chiefs feel like they have no obligation to obey elected officials they dislike. They lied about the pull out in Syria and apparently blew off preparation orders from both both the Trump and Biden administrations in Afghanistan. We know they lied about that last drone strike in Afghanistan and who knows what else they've lied about or what other orders they've opted to ignore.

Like so many of our non-elected officials the military bureaucracy has faced no consequences for blatantly illegal and malicious actions for so long that they clearly believe they are above such concerns. If the elected government does not start punishing bad actions this will continue until the conventional military joins the alphabet agencies in being rogue actors.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top