Search results

Is it that huge of a social issue that it needs a special discussion? This is literally one dude.

The anti-porn crowd are being pretty damn leftish about this whole issue. Pushing a grossly illiberal stance in the name of bettering society while inventing made-up words inside their clique to describe that evil thing they don't like ("coomer" for example). Both sides represent the same kind...

"Porn made him do it". Yeah, sure. Violent video games too, I take it? Or maybe he needed more Jesus in his life? GTFO

Interesting that you didn't say the same thing to him over his "praying" remark, which is basically the same thing. The details are different but the gist of it is the same. Porn is bad, women need more modesty et cetera. One is trying to force a broad category of prople people to do thing X...

Oh noes, a MEME! What a splendid rebuttal! (Meanwhile you and the most radical of feminist basically have completely identical talking points).

I'll be rubbing one off this evening especially for you, sweety. :whistle:

Not almost, exactly as. Horseshoe theory.

Everything that goes against stone age Abrahamic tribal nonsense is "degenerate". "Degenerate" is just as much of a buzzword as "racist" and "fascist".

Of course he had that reaction, that's because you're basically a moron. I'm 33, watch porn regularly, am married in a healthy relationship and a healthy sex life, so I don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Everyone I know are basically the same as me. But at least you and @Lanmandragon...

Alright. The common good will be served best by allowing individuals to make an informed decision on porn consumption (or participation) by themselves.

They are religious laws because the sole justification for their existence is religious. I'm not counting your extremely unconvincing "evidence" for the harm of pornography, of course.

You want at least one religious law though, probably lots more. What's the difference? In practice it's the same thing.

Frankly, it's much worse than the regressive left. The choice between living in a communist or a theocratic shithole is not appealing in the slightest, but I guess if I have no choice but to have my rights taken away then at least I can still choose to live in a secular state.

What if I do have a sexual fetish? I don't see any reason to be ashamed of any such thing, nor do I see why resisting your authoritarian impositions on that basis is a bad thing. I will not be discussing my sex life in detail. I WILL say that I do not smoke weed or any other drug (I did use to...

@The Name of Love This. Also, if I had an addiction of any kind, whether to porn or otherwise, and if I thought it's an issue that has harmful consequences, which is not a trivial conclusion to make (certainly in regards to porn), I would obviously go to a certified professional rather than a...

LOL, sure.

Call me whatever you like, having access to things even if they go against someone else's religious beliefs, whether it's porn, or alcohol, or premarital sex or bacon or any of the other things you or people similar to you in outlook would like to restrict is more important to me than not being...

That's definitely encouraging.

It's not "because you disagreed with me on the internet" obviously, are you being intentionally dense? It's because you and your sympathizers will clearly try to implement your crazy ideas and take away my rights were you to take power. If I see that this is the paradigm the right is shifting to...

No. I'm willing to be with whatever side will let me continue my way of life with as little changes as possible (for the negative). I thought that would probably be the right, but your attitude definitely makes me doubt that. I can definitely swallow my pride and learn some fictional pronouns...