Search results

Indeed. "It's only education" is leftist blank slateist dogma, no more, no less. What the right mocks as belief that all people of the world are just interchangeable economic units like in a Civ-like game.

It's culture and possibly even biology, not just education. And with woke laws and regulations like AA and "disparate impact" doctrine, that is intolerable to the legal and political status quo. So how many BYD and Tata cars did you see on the road last time you were driving? Mostly, entirely...

It doesn't cost less because Mexicans work faster. It costs less because the strict western laws and regulations do not apply in Mexico. Only at home (here our overcomplicated laws apply), and low quality workers are not more efficient. If they were, Japan and South Korea would not be...

If they were, there would not be much argument for large scale migration - too many of them not worth the costs and risks of hosting them for their meager menial job profit. Only "cream of the crop" migration would be acceptable then. And societies that do not have much of such internal problems...

https://rmx.news/crime/germany-jordanian-migrant-on-trial-for-series-of-rapes-and-sexual-assaults-threatens-to-kill-prosecutor/

Islam has the impressive ability to make even Buddhist monks sound like Identity Evropa guys.

Seems like to the surprise of many, Polish liberal led coalition is still somewhat interested in winning elections in the future and on account of that keeps "migrant" policy similar to the previous government. Meanwhile in Sweden:

Yeah, i couldn't care less what amateur e-lawyers call honesty, nevermind adhering to it. Not news at all, it is long known that as far as far left is concerned, illegals, especially those who never would nor should have a chance of legal immigration, make most loyal supporters, as their...

I'll take it as a yes. I could, but i would get reported for those. I couldn't care less about your advertising of your fringe views, believe what you will, but don't expect me or most people in general to share those beliefs. What truth? About trying to argue if your basic and in my opinion...

Likewise. Why was a case from 2018 waiting for a Biden DoJ to cuck, and why was this cucking accepted by the judge even though you admit it's just rare for it not to be? Guess i need to speak in lawyerspeak to you because any imprecisions in language you will consider owns against me. Go...

And it is uncommon knowledge to people that instead of playing smartass like that, a judge unsympathetic to the progressive cause would probably rule against this in this case ongoing since friggin 2018, and saying no to settlements being rare would also not stop such from saying no regardless...

How is that not the judge's fault too? As you said, it takes both parties. I'm not arguing that Biden admin is innocent in this, but activist judges in cooperation with democrats can and do set up legal status quo that stays there even when a Republican holds the presidency. Again, more...

Here's a well known enough for even me to have heard of example of courts helping with detail based obstructionism in immigration enforcement: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/us-government-reaches-settlement-class-action-family-separation-case-seeking-injunctive Yeah, sure, there's a reason why...

Let's not play with technicalities, laws are a tip of the iceberg, the little details of how agencies, courts, and other government institutions are meant to work also have their own effects. "But it's executive branch" is a hilarious way to handwave policies that mysteriously survive changes...

It's easy to say nothing changed when you don't care to know about changes and say others know little when it is you who knows jack shit. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/20/immigration-reform-under-obama-timeline https://immigrationhistory.org/item/refugee-act-of-1980/...

There is no shortage of activist lawyers willing to take these cases and bullshit plenty. The problem is that by the process they get a "foot in the door" so that they get years to either get better arguments for their stay or disappear into the overloaded bureaucracy and stay for years before...

Well that seems to be a kind of interpretation... No laws say the asylum claimants have to be taken at their word and be assumed to be honest. The dreaded elasticity of "muh human rights" comes into this. It worked because the kind of places you wanted to take asylum seekers from were in fact...

It is an exploit indeed, but an old one, and it was not tested and probably also recognized for decades, no new laws were made that enabled this. It's just old law interpreted tested in new woke courts and parliaments. If it's anyone's intention, it's theirs. Theoretically they have to lie that...

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/other/the-explosion-of-asylum-claims-driving-the-global-migrant-crisis/ar-BB1lf7BC A fairly neutral and mainstream article about the massive scamming of western asylum systems.

Yeah, sure, i will believe it when i see it. Until then, it's a bullshit sale, and i'm not buying.