United States 2nd Amendment Legal Cases and Law Discussion

bullethead

Part-time fanfic writer
Super Moderator
Staff Member
Florida is free of the brace bullshit for now!


LEGAL ALERT: A Florida federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against the ATF's pistol brace rule (applying only to the plaintiffs and their FL-based customers), saying it likely violates the APA. https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flmd.410428/gov.uscourts.flmd.410428.47.0.pdf

GEzHFl9WcAAuJbR

GEzHIDpWoAAEpj0

GEzHKZxXoAEQdJS
 

bullethead

Part-time fanfic writer
Super Moderator
Staff Member
Palmetto State Armory being based:


Article:
Palmetto State Armory has filed an amicus brief with the U.S. Supreme Court in support of the plaintiffs challenging ATF's bump stock ban (Cargill v. Garland). Oral arguments in the case are scheduled for next month.

We here at Palmetto State Armory and affiliates are determined to stop any and all over-reach by the ATF. We thank you for your business as a portion of every purchase goes to funding cases like this. We look forward to this victory and many more.

To learn more about the Amicus Brief go to:
 

bullethead

Part-time fanfic writer
Super Moderator
Staff Member
Based judge kicks New York ass:






Article:
LEGAL ALERT: A federal judge has issued a preliminary injunction against an Upstate New York public housing authority that banned its tenants from keeping handguns in their homes: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nynd.141417/gov.uscourts.nynd.141417.28.0.pdf
GFHgapqWkAEQzxE

GFHgapxXkAA1rJH

GFHgapyWgAA66Rg

Article:
The judge says he "has trouble accepting" the housing authority's argument that public housing didn't exist at the founding:
GFHkjBQWgAApyjL

Article:
"For the sake of brevity, the Court will not linger on the lack of relevant similarity between limiting a right of criminal convicts and limiting a right of law-abiding, responsible citizens."
GFHm-XsXIAEvBFg

Article:
"Defendants base their justification for their Firearms Ban on half of a historical analogy (to a non-firearms regulation, no less), which actually seems to undermine their case."
GFHnV3ZWoAA88LC

Article:
"Even if the Court were persuaded by this assertion, the Supreme Court in Heller specifically rejected it as a ground for finding such a firearms regulation constitutional"
GFHnmJ4WUAAYGIP

GFHnrkKWUAA3zbU

Article:
The judge was not amused by the housing authority's argument that it can ban tenants from owning handguns because they can buy crossbows instead:
GFHnzrVWgAAAM6g
 

bullethead

Part-time fanfic writer
Super Moderator
Staff Member
Judge Benetiz dunks on Califonia once again:






Article:
LEGAL ALERT: A federal judge has struck down California's ammunition background check requirement, saying it violates the Second Amendment: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.casd.571335/gov.uscourts.casd.571335.105.0.pdf
GFL6zCNWAAA-sf4

GFL62nNXMAAplul

GFL64OEWoAEeaEF

Article:
"Though they are citizens entitled to enjoy all of the constitutional rights, Californians are denied the Second Amendment right to buy ammunition for self-defense at least 11% of the time because of problems with the background check system."
GFL81ObXEAAMfPS

Article:
"The first argument employs a rhetorical device to over- describe in detail the asserted constitutional wrong. Having over-described the alleged constitutional right, it is then argued that the detailed description of the asserted right is not covered by the plain text of the Constitution."
GFL9Rq3XEAEcEvM

GFL9Uw-XEAA8YUL

Article:
"Because ammunition sale prohibitions and regulations are covered by the Second Amendment, the presumption is that such restrictions are infringements."
GFL90uzWUAAOTyd

Article:
"To sum up, approximately 635,000 residents were required to undergo background checks in the last half of 2019, the denials of which prompted the arrests of 15 individuals which led to six criminal convictions."
GFL-eaTW8AAVGwy

Article:
"If a state identification requirement for voting which burdens 4.5% of registered voters is an unconstitutional burden on the Fifteenth Amendment, surely a state identification requirement that blocks an untold number of gun owners from undergoing an ammunition background check and then rejects 11% of those who are checked, is likewise an unconstitutional burden on the Second Amendment."
GFL-uVAWwAAfSuy

GFL-xfGWwAAp35D

Article:
"If any background check system satisfies Bruen’s footnote nine description of a scheme put to abusive ends, as opposed to the system originally approved by the voters, this may be it."
GFL-8bKWwAEWfSH
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top