Germans did give us some tanks back when they had tanks to spare, those 1 euro Leopard 2's weren't so cheap in the long run.
Now they don't even have any left to give. Spain had some... third hand ones but in such bad state that they had to go for factory repairs, they are scheduled to go to Slovakia, while Slovakia gave Ukraine its modernized T-72's that Ukraine can use right away.
Logistics. Can Ukraine send a few divisions of engineers and technicians to learn to use these for months, and then deal with their massive logistical needs? F-16 for example is infamous for getting engine damage if there is debris on runways.
There is talk of Ukrainians training for F-16's now that it's pretty assured that they will last for said months, so that may get somewhere.
As for tanks, moving the 70 ton M1's around Ukraine's already crappy and now often war damaged infrastructure is going to be a bitch. People even whine that it's a problem in Poland. What Ukraine could use more is a big Bradley shipment to help them form mechanized infantry not based on shitty BMP-1's. But there the problem is that USA has hardly any spare Bradleys, they use almost all they have.
1.We still could get older Abrams.Enough for fighting soviets.When now we had maybe 450 tanks left.
If Moscov decide to attack,we would have problems.
And - i simply do not trust ANY Democrat president.They wanted sell part of Ukraine to Putin before war,why not sell Poland,too?
2.Abrams - then Ukraine would lost roads,but win
F.16 - then send older F.15.
Bradleys - you have point.
P.S i hear conspiracy theory about Dugina death - she supposed to get task of delivering money to Le Pen for elections,and somehow fucked it.So,she was KGB target,not her father.