Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow

Reader mode
Bigking321

Bigking321

Well-known member
Cherico said:
That's roughly 21 electoral votes, if we keep digging how many more states had enough fraud to flip the result?
Click to expand...

At least Michigan, Philadelphia, and Georgia.

Any state that stopped counting votes in the blue cities until the rest of the state finished counting. They stopped counting so they would know how many votes they needed dropped off at 2 in the morning, needed to be disqualified, needed to be altered, to flip the state.

The pause in counting was the big tell for blatant stealing. Georgia did it again during the senate run off to steal those 2 senate seats as well.

I'm 100% sure there was other fraud all over the place, but the places that paused were where they were going to win no matter what they had to do and had the blue cities or corrupt establishment Republicans covering for them.
 
posh-goofiness

posh-goofiness

Well-known member
Cherico said:
So there was enough fraud in Arizona and Winsconsin to flip both states and thats proven fraud.

That's roughly 21 electoral votes, if we keep digging how many more states had enough fraud to flip the result? This is more or less a death blow to Bidens legitimacy.
Click to expand...

To be really exact, in AZ they didn't find "fraud", they found 50k ballots of dubious or unclear data provenance. To prove fraud, they would have needed to investigate those ballots more deeply.

Not that I don't believe they they are fraudulent. But it's still got to be proven.
 
W

Wargamer08

Well-known member
posh-goofiness said:
To be really exact, in AZ they didn't find "fraud", they found 50k ballots of dubious or unclear data provenance. To prove fraud, they would have needed to investigate those ballots more deeply.

Not that I don't believe they they are fraudulent. But it's still got to be proven.
Click to expand...
Fraud investigations have requirements that certain people have made impossible to meet. At best these days, you can prove that certain records that are required to be kept under law are missing or destroyed. Fraud requires evidence, it's far too late to find more then evidence of absence.
 
LordsFire

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
posh-goofiness said:
To be really exact, in AZ they didn't find "fraud", they found 50k ballots of dubious or unclear data provenance. To prove fraud, they would have needed to investigate those ballots more deeply.

Not that I don't believe they they are fraudulent. But it's still got to be proven.
Click to expand...

Fraud with named perpetrators hasn't been legally proven in the court.

50k ballots that have key problems like not even being signed, that's proof that fraud happened, even if we can't pin it on specific people.
 
posh-goofiness

posh-goofiness

Well-known member
LordsFire said:
Fraud with named perpetrators hasn't been legally proven in the court.

50k ballots that have key problems like not even being signed, that's proof that fraud happened, even if we can't pin it on specific people.
Click to expand...
Once again, to be really exact. It's only proof that something happened. Maybe the post office fucked up in some way? Or a polling place didn't vet the ballots properly, or any other (increasingly unlikely reason).

Like Epstein, we all know what really happened. But proving it is... not happening.
 
C

Cherico

Well-known member
posh-goofiness said:
To be really exact, in AZ they didn't find "fraud", they found 50k ballots of dubious or unclear data provenance. To prove fraud, they would have needed to investigate those ballots more deeply.

Not that I don't believe they they are fraudulent. But it's still got to be proven.
Click to expand...

OIP.BqWYRZ2luN5IRZeeIwEEqAHaP1
 
Rocinante

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
posh-goofiness said:
Once again, to be really exact. It's only proof that something happened. Maybe the post office fucked up in some way? Or a polling place didn't vet the ballots properly, or any other (increasingly unlikely reason).

Like Epstein, we all know what really happened. But proving it is... not happening.
Click to expand...
17,000 duplicates in AZ didn't happen by accident.
 
LordsFire

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
posh-goofiness said:
Once again, to be really exact. It's only proof that something happened. Maybe the post office fucked up in some way? Or a polling place didn't vet the ballots properly, or any other (increasingly unlikely reason).

Like Epstein, we all know what really happened. But proving it is... not happening.
Click to expand...

Not on that scale, not in one county.

There's a point where at the absolute minimum you have what is called criminal negligence, but this exceeds even that.
 
posh-goofiness

posh-goofiness

Well-known member
www.cnn.com

An Arizona bill would empower state legislators to reject election results | CNN Politics

Republican lawmakers in a battleground state are pushing dozens of major changes to the state's voting laws, including a controversial bill that would empower legislators to reject election results.
www.cnn.com www.cnn.com

The relevant section of the bill in question.
HB 2596 said:
NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER STATUTE: 10 1. THE LEGISLATURE SHALL CALL ITSELF INTO SESSION TO REVIEW THE 11 BALLOT TABULATING PROCESS FOR THE REGULAR PRIMARY AND GENERAL ELECTIONS 12 AND ON REVIEW SHALL ACCEPT OR REJECT THE ELECTION RESULTS. IF THE 13 LEGISLATURE ACCEPTS THE ELECTION RESULTS, THE ELECTION CANVASS AND RELATED 14 CERTIFICATIONS AND PROCLAMATIONS MAY PROCEED AS OTHERWISE PROVIDED BY LAW, 15 AND THE LEGISLATURE MAY ADJOURN ITS SESSION. IF THE LEGISLATURE REJECTS 16 THE ELECTION RESULTS, ANY QUALIFIED ELECTOR MAY FILE AN ACTION IN THE 17 SUPERIOR COURT TO REQUEST THAT A NEW ELECTION BE HELD. 18 2. THE LEGISLATURE MAY CONDUCT AN AUDIT OF ELECTION RESULTS FOR ANY 19 REGULAR PRIMARY OR GENERAL ELECTION.
Click to expand...

The media may kick and scream but AZ knows what's up.
 
Sobek

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
I think the number of people who think Biden stole the election has actually reached 54% of the voters or something. I may be wrong about the exact number but the fact is that it is very VERY far from "fringe conspiracy theory" and well into "well known and believed by many people".
 
Captain X

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
Pennsylvania court declares state’s mail-in voting law unconstitutional, in win for Republicans

A Pennsylvania court struck down the state’s expansive mail-in voting law as unconstitutional, delivering a temporary win to state Republicans who challenged the law after former president Donald Trump falsely claimed mail-in voting resulted in election fraud.

While the two-year-old law was struck down by a majority of the five-judge panel of the Commonwealth Court, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf (D) and the state’s attorney general, Josh Shapiro (D), promised a swift appeal, criticizing the court’s opinion as being “based on twisted logic and faulty reasoning.”

“The administration will immediately appeal this decision to the state Supreme Court and today’s lower court ruling will have no immediate effect on mail-in voting pending a final decision on the appeal,” Wolf said Friday.
Click to expand...
 
Sobek

Sobek

Disgusting Scalie
Rocinante

Rocinante

Russian Bot
Founder
Reader mode
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Top