Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
Necromancer Joe can do amazing things.
Election 2020 Election Fraud: Let's face it, this year will be a shitshow
- Thread starter MelancholicMechanicus
- Start date
Necromancer Joe can do amazing things.
Comrade Clod
Gay Space Communist
I mean, you'd sort of think that'd get peoples attention no?
Only this is actually a new theory to me. Whereupon might I find these lists of the deceased whom allegedly have voted?
DarthOne
☦️
Check out this list of over 1,200 Michigan voters who felt so compelled to participate in the 2020 presidential race, they voted from beyond the grave:
Link is in spoilers otherwise the whole list shows up; didn’t want to clutter up the thread.
Names Of Some 'Dead People' Who Voted In US 2020 Election
Latest Celebrity News | Trending African Stories | Breaking News Nigeria
africanentertainment.com
We have accounts on record Clod, other people could probally find more
Linda Kesler of Nicholson, Ga. Linda Kesler died in 2003, that's a pretty defiant case of what I am talking about. Now your response to that is to insult my sources because I know you. This is actually not a new point of discussion in this thread it has come up in the past. This is also not the first time dead people have voted in united states elections.
This is an old voter fraud tactic.
And I'm honestly surprised that your so angry about the accusations, voter fraud, stealing elections, fake elections communists have been doing that since the beginning. Fixing elections is really one of the few things that communists have a history of actually doing well.
You think you would have a little pride in the one thing communists don't screw up.
Greengrass
Well-known member
The Lynda (not Linda) Kesler who actually voted is very much alive, and the dead woman did not vote.
"Linda Kesler, a resident of Nicholson, Georgia, who died in 2003 is listed as deceased in county voting records and didn’t vote this year, Jackson County election officials told The Associated Press. Lynda Kesler, who has a similar name but a different address, birthday and zip code, did vote, they said."
Basileus_Komnenos
Imperator Romanorum Βασιλεύς των Ρωμαίων
When I see people talk about "voter fraud" often times people complain that its one grand Democratic conspiracy which I think is utterly ridiculous. There are way too many moving parts and so many unpredictable variables that would cause such a centrally planned and detailed scheme to fail.
The more likely outcome is that there are various groups of unhinged people in their irrational hatred of the Orange Man sought to prevent him from winning by any means. All you need is a few handful of these groups in a close election to tip the scales which is pretty much what happened.
Though I have no idea how the Trump campaign is going to fight this considering how the electors vote in December. Some judges might be against the idea of overturning the votes entirely and leaving it to state delegations. There are unfortunately a lot of activist judges as well. Justice Kennedy for example is infamous for siding with the more liberal members based on skewed interpretations of the consitution.
As a Catholic I want ACB and Kavanaugh to smack down the corrupt Democrat/Establishment considering how they tried to smear religious people during their confirmation hearings. A lot of the bigotry levied there was reminiscent of the old 20th Century hatred towards Catholics as "filthy Papists." Its also not surprising considering how Dems from that era were the main proponents of segregation. And considering how they treat minorities that dare to voice a different opinion, I guess I rest my case.
The more likely outcome is that there are various groups of unhinged people in their irrational hatred of the Orange Man sought to prevent him from winning by any means. All you need is a few handful of these groups in a close election to tip the scales which is pretty much what happened.
Though I have no idea how the Trump campaign is going to fight this considering how the electors vote in December. Some judges might be against the idea of overturning the votes entirely and leaving it to state delegations. There are unfortunately a lot of activist judges as well. Justice Kennedy for example is infamous for siding with the more liberal members based on skewed interpretations of the consitution.
As a Catholic I want ACB and Kavanaugh to smack down the corrupt Democrat/Establishment considering how they tried to smear religious people during their confirmation hearings. A lot of the bigotry levied there was reminiscent of the old 20th Century hatred towards Catholics as "filthy Papists." Its also not surprising considering how Dems from that era were the main proponents of segregation. And considering how they treat minorities that dare to voice a different opinion, I guess I rest my case.
Archmagnus
Well-known member
Couldn't find a source except his lawyer-word on it, so take it with a grain of salt
Big if true though.
Big if true though.
Basileus_Komnenos
Imperator Romanorum Βασιλεύς των Ρωμαίων
If this is true in the swing states, and Trump manages to overturn the results there, imagine what happened in other states.
mesonoxian
Well-known member
This is really pretty funny. First off, good to know we can count on AfricanEntertainment.com to deliver us the hard hitting news we need. The very first case he lists, James Blalock, isn't a dead man voting. It is his wife, who's registered as "Mrs. James E Blalock". Just grabbing a list of voters and a list of dead people is going to get you a ton of false positives. But even if every hit were invalid, it still wouldn't give Trump the lead. Trump lost Michigan by well over 100,000 votes. He lost Nevada by over 30,000 votes.Names Of Some 'Dead People' Who Voted In US 2020 Election
Latest Celebrity News | Trending African Stories | Breaking News Nigeria
We have accounts on record Clod, other people could probally find more
Linda Kesler of Nicholson, Ga. Linda Kesler died in 2003, that's a pretty defiant case of what I am talking about. Now your response to that is to insult my sources because I know you. This is actually not a new point of discussion in this thread it has come up in the past. This is also not the first time dead people have voted in united states elections.
This is an old voter fraud tactic.
And I'm honestly surprised that your so angry about the accusations, voter fraud, stealing elections, fake elections communists have been doing that since the beginning. Fixing elections is really one of the few things that communists have a history of actually doing well.
You think you would have a little pride in the one thing communists don't screw up.
Not especially. That just means 89% were conclusive matches. With any kind of machine verification, you will get a lot of inconclusive results. "illegal ballots" and "the machine didn't declare the match conclusive" are not remotely the same. Especially with a high turn out, you likely have many people voting for the first time in a long while, meaning the signatures on file might be quite out of date, because they do change over time. So even if Barnes is telling the truth, it wouldn't indicate fraud.
The vast majority of people in congress are religious. They reasonably had issues with Barrett's membership in a very conservative religious group that had attracted criticism before her nomination. That is not remotely the same as smearing all religious people, or all Catholics. (Also, Biden is Catholic.)
Kavanagh's religion never came up. Just his history of rape and his total lack of professionalism.
History of Rape. I'm pretty sure the accuser got utterly trashed when her story fell apart. As for professionalism. I'd like to see you get accused of one of the most vile things a man can be accused of and remain professional. Watch them turn it into a public circus and put your family through hell. They didn't just accuse the man of Rape. They straight up made him look like a moustache twirling villain who orchestrated Rape gangs for lolz.
Fuck being professional with that kind of unprofessional conduct on the Democrats. Not one affidavit, not one credible corroboration, not one credible source. That whole circus was some straight up bullshit.
Archmagnus
Well-known member
This tickles my funny bone.
The left launches a media circus over a supposed event decades ago with no evidence. They investigate Trump and launch the impeachment over basically nothing as well.
But thousands of affidavits, expert IT professional testimonies, dozens of witnesses and camera footage of chicanery, and still "no evidence of election fraud" to the same kind of people who wanted to crucify Kavanaugh.
What's the sitch?
Well-known member
This is why I haven't bothered responding to him the entire time. He may eventually come across his own revelation as cherico I think made in another post, but it's not going to be from any of us. Nothing we say will convince otherwise. We really are at a point where people are living in parallel realities.
Ironically it was the Kavenaugh witch trial that finally woke me up, that caused me to ponder, wait a second.... what else are they lying about.
mesonoxian
Well-known member
Her story didn't fall apart. I watched the entirety of the confirmation. Her story was completely coherent. It was confirmed by others that she had spoken of the attack years before he became a prominent figure. Kavanagh is a rapist, and when he almost had to face the harsh consequence of not getting to be on the supreme court, he sobbed like a baby and threatened the Senate.
The failure of the Republicans to convict Trump is predicatble. They are spineless and believe in nothing. The "evidence" of fraud seems to be twitter posts and youtube videos from randos.
Why are you assuming machine verification when there was no mention of the Democrat expert using machine verification in the tweet?
mesonoxian
Well-known member
Because they have signature verification machines in Arizona, so I presume they would use them when verifying signatures.
Believe it or not, so too was it with my Dad. My old man has been a staunch Democrat all his life. He was definitely one of the Blue Dog Democrats and he's known there something wrong with the Party but he can't put his finger on it. He was...disappointed when I said I was Republican, but then half his brothers are Republican and half of his children are Republican so there is that. Anyhoo, he got an eye opener when it came to Kavanaugh. I mean, it almost woke him up to the games the Democrats play in order to achieve power. It shook his faith in the Party.
Her story absolutely DID fall apart. No one corroborated her testimony, not one person could verify a thing she said. Yet you expect me to believe her? Get outta here with that kurbunk. I don't believe women just because it says 'believe all women'. I believe evidence.
And the evidence was clear. Kavanaugh did no such thing.
Now, how does this tie in with the current situation? It shows a pattern of behavior by the Democrats but also their raging hypocrisy. The Democrats had nothing on Kavanaugh, and nothing on the Russian Collusion nor the Pee Pee tapes. Nothing. Yet they claimed they had mountains of evidence. They had zilch. Yet they went hard to destroy a mans life. A man who is our current sitting President. Love him or hate him, there should be a fine line you don't cross and the Democrats crossed it long ago. Now the shoe is on the other foot and unlike the Democrats Republicans actually put up rather than shut up. We have hundreds if not thousands of Affidavits, we have videos, statistical anomalies and too many irregularities that make no sense. More and more is coming to light. But the Democrats are saying we have nothing. I'm sorry but no. We are not playing that game anymore. There has been enough exposed in this thread that had this been the Republicans rather than the Democrats who had done this, Dems would be screaming bloody murder. And that's a fact.
The real irony is how rapidly that idea got thrown away the minute it started being applied to Democrats. Tara Reade anyone?
LordsFire
Internet Wizard
One of the sad realizations for me in regards to how thoroughly leftism had twisted the minds of people I had followed on SB, related to things like this.
A writer whose work I read, and became part of the moderating staff, argued about illegal immigration, that it wasn't right to call them 'illegal immigrants.' It was an 'administrative violation,' and until criminal border-crossing was proven in a court of law, it was morally wrong to call them illegal immigrants.
When Kavanaugh came up in discussion with this guy? He was 'rapey Mcrape-face.'
...Yeah. The sheer double-think of leftists is hard to wrap your mind around sometimes.
Duke Nukem
Hail to the king baby
Interesting...
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Breaking: GEORGE SOROS Appoints Lord Mark Malloch Brown - The Former President of Smartmatic - to Lead Open Society Foundation | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
On Saturday afternoon billionaire far left funder George Soros announced new leadership at his Open Society Foundation.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
mesonoxian
Well-known member
I don't expect you to believe her. I think it would be reasonable to believe her, given the evidence, but I don't expect that to happen.
Trump literally asked for the Russians to steal information from his opponent on television. I agree he didn't successfully coordinate with the Russians, but that seems more to do with him being an incompetent surrounded by incompetents. The spirit was willing, but the talent was lacking. Likewise, he tried to generate a smear against Joe Biden in Ukraine, but failed to actually pull it off. He's violated the emoluments clause in very obvious, uncontroversial ways as well. Trump isn't Machiavelli. He's still the same racist huckster he was when he was shilling bad steaks and fake diplomas.
Y'all do in fact have nothing. As much as Trump and Giuliani and co. put on a show for Twitter and OAN, in the actual courtroom, where the decision is made and where Trump's lawyers have so far been unwilling to perjure themselves, they have admitted the have nothing, and judges have treated their cases appropriately. My favorite exchange was the one where the Trump lawyers claimed the campaign wasn't allowed to observe the ballot counting process. When the judge asked if anyone from the campaign was present the Trump lawyer replied there were a "nonzero number" of them.
Tara Reade's story actually did fall apart. For that matter, so did the third Kavanagh accuser's. You know whose didn't? Leeann Tweeden. Al Franken was removed from his position (and rightfully so) for kissing her against her will and groping women. Meanwhile, the Republicans ran a pedophile for office in Alabama. (Thank God the people of Alabama were too decent to let them get away with it.) I don't say this as someone who thinks highly of the Democrats. Throwing out abusers and rapists is the bear minimum that should be expected. It just isn't always accomplished.
Meanwhile, Trump bragged about sexually assaulting women, violently abused and sexually assaulted his wife, and has a long list of women who says he groped them.
Are you complaining that someone treats rape as more morally significant than crossing a border without having your papers in order?