Carlson telling people to engage in massed civil disobedience against the Feds last night?
Any truth to that?
Any truth to that?
Breaking News FBI raids Trump's Mar-a-Largo Resort home
- Thread starter Sobek
- Start date
Ixian
Well-known member
He was probably just quoting a Democrat.
It won't happen, and they will keep getting away with this sort of thing, because the intel agencies and deep state are no longer feeling the need for a 'slow boil', now they are going fullbore into attempting to consolidate power in the long term.
The FBI and friends decided attacking Trump and dislike of Trump would allow them to justify nearly anything, after they got their Reichstag Fire on Jan 6th and what Page and Strozk got away with doing in 2016, plus the Russia-gate hoax.
Even assuming a Red Wave happens, at the end of the day the Dems will just ignore laws, Congressional rules, and legal precedent to keep as much power as they can, even if it's just a Biden veto.
We are a banana republic, and this is just being confirmed more every day.
Article on it.
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
Mike Lindell was returning from a hunting trip when a bunch of FBI agents surrounded his car in a Hardee's Parking Lot in Minnesota and took his cell phone.
Ixian
Well-known member
Article on it.
Zerohedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Mike Lindell was returning from a hunting trip when a bunch of FBI agents surrounded his car in a Hardee's Parking Lot in Minnesota and took his cell phone.
There have been dozens of political leaders subjected to this at this point. I think we are just a couple steps away from this turning into a shooting conflict.
We aren't anywhere close to a shooting conflict, because most of the populace listens to the MSM and think anyone who helped Trump is an 'innsurrectionist', and believe the lies about the raid.
There will never be another US civil war, because most of the populace has no taste or desire for it, and effective political change will have to come from the Right embracing MLK-like methods, instead of acting like they are waiting for a Minuteman call-up from George Washington.
Ixian
Well-known member
A shooting conflict doesn't have to be a "civil war", and frankly I agree that sort of conflict isn't likely in the US.
Instead we will get our own "time of troubles", think less battle lines and military maneuvers and more car bombs and sporadic gunfights.
Possible; I definitely could see the US devolving into an Irish Troubles type situation, not a full on ACW 2.0 situation.
Of course the Irish Troubles were before mass drone deployments and spy gear in every phone, so not sure it would even get that far.
You're not right here at all. Look at the numbers in the ratings. The MSM is NOT getting much viewership at all.
You don't need most of the populace to want one to have one happen. 10% is plenty.
Drones are useful but overrated. They have weakness that can be cheaply exploited. Cell systems are also extremely vulnerable.
Morphic Tide
Well-known member
There's also the matter that unlike the Sandbox, a revolt in the US can go after the higher leadership and supplies. You can't protect the family of every drone operator and DIE pushing officer, you can't keep the power and roads to every city and base, it's just took much land to patrol.
Even before the infantry needed to hold ground turn the chain of command into swiss cheese by mass fragging.
Even before the infantry needed to hold ground turn the chain of command into swiss cheese by mass fragging.
Lets chill about this talk about going after families of drone operators and civil war. We all know things can get ugly if it gets violent. Here is to hoping it wont.
strunkenwhite
Well-known member
Even broadcast?
They are getting enough, and that metric ignores radio channels, like NPR.
And a lot of people who may not watch the news do listen to NPR.
I won't derail this more on this issue, I will just say I disagree.
Again, I disagree.
He isn't wrong about the drones and stuff.
And yall assume the military will just decide "Fuck it listening to the gov".
Most enlisted, as in the ones controlling everything, are generally moderate to conservative
Which is why they are trying to get tons of dangerahairs and back-the-blue types into uniform.
DC and the Dems are playing the long game to mold the US military into another woke machine that does it's political bidding and can be utilized domestically against political opponents.
I mean just look at what the wokies and their friends have done with the FBI and non-military agencies.
Same in the UK, too.
Employers do still consider university/college education on CV's, but apparently they respect Open University degrees more (because it's typically older adults with more life-experience or younger adults that know hardship in trying to work around earning a degree) than those fresh from the college/university diploma mills.
Additionally, if the applicant proves they have the skills learned from a third-party (such as an online training camp, courses, or are self-taught) that they can show on a practical level (programming, graphic design, et cetera), they prioritise them over college/university graduates (unless they're going for diversity hires, basically).
Hell, a lot more people are going into trades than colleges/universities (great job security, they are -- the world will always need plumbers, builders, electricians, et cetera).
The One Char
Well-known member
The problem with that is three things.
1.) competence and dangerahairsare two circles that do not intersect.
2.) Back-the-blue are ontonly a dying breed, they don't like the federal government.
3.) there are at the most BS-ing lowest, 30 million gun-owners. the entire us military, the biggest military in the world, employs 1 million people.
EDIT: I have to add that 1 million includes support staff.
Last edited: