I am willing to concede when I am wrong. And some of the stuff does give me pause. Like 4 which could be used to ban deportation, 5 which could lead to the crazy idea to abolish prisons, and 10 which might prevent banning abortion.
Ok you are right, I thought that the limit was just war crimes, and genocide. In light of this I am against joining up with it.
Though even so most of Europe are able to join it and not be forced to do wokeism. It's the EU that forces migrants on people not the ICC.
Are you saying there was no warrant for Bush, or Obama?
That's how you seem to act, you support wars against China, Russia, the middle east, Africa. Is there any nation you would be against the US invading besides Poland?
So leftists will just win since they will get the power you are too scared to get and use?
You have this American conservative fear of power. It's the same reason many support "small government" you've even defended this idea in the past. You say "Oh we shouldn't do this or create this power because it will be used against us, it's illegitimate!" So then that lets the liberals create it and shape it how they want. We can see this with how federal police agencies and federal central power and strong central standing armies work. Those who have control of them are in charge, and the small government types who decry the DEA, ATF, FBI as illegitimate don't do anything since they can't stop it.
Oh and your ideas about "not giving a fuck about those who are practically dead" is the same type of buffoonery that allows libeals to win and get away with everything. No don't get revenge, no they lost power blah blah blah. It's because of ideas like yours that leftists like Stalin were able to win and die of natural causes.
Because the constitution has left a big fucking hole that protects Bush, Obama, Biden, etc. and all other corrupt politicians so that we no longer are in a democracy or Republic but an oligarchy. It's because of this that an update is needed.
So if they are a threat, then they are either a peer, or near peer power. If you are able to be a threat to someone instead of a minor nuisance then you are a peer. A peer does not mean you are equally strong. It just means you are on the same or similar level.
Fair enough thats why I retracted my statement for the ICC. If we do a deportation we should be able to do it without getting blindsided by foreign rivals.
What is wrong with that? Diden't you say we "took care of our own war crime trials" If so then you should have no problem with that. Fuck any soldier that was involved in civilian deaths they are a dishonorable piece of shit and don't deserve respect or "being thanked for their service" You aren't servicing me by killing civilians, and women and children. I receive no benefit from that flat out, this is ignoring the moral objection but flat out I get no benefit.
