That is not a good thing, and should not be cheered for.Not to mention that by now people are just about mad enough to start lynching RINOs.
Vote them out, primary their ass's, but do not physically harm them.
That is not a good thing, and should not be cheered for.Not to mention that by now people are just about mad enough to start lynching RINOs.
Trust me, I don’t want it to happen either. I’d love nothing more then for the USA to come out of all this without having to result to such horrible and uncivilized methods.That is not a good thing, and should not be cheered for.
Vote them out, primary their ass's, but do not physically harm them.
I’d disagree about the last part. The reason the far-left/left can get away with a sustained ANYTHING is that law enforcement is told to look the other way and the media either ignores or runs cover for them. If it wasn’t that, those LARPers would get curb-stomped. Look at how quickly they crumble when faced with any remotely serious opposition.
Also from what I’ve seen the right (for better or worse) wants to try and fix things without resulting in ‘mostly peaceful’ riots or street battles.
I suspect that a fair bit of this comes down to a genuine respect for the (righteous) rule of law. And also, as it is oft said; ‘the right thinks the left is just wrong. The Left thinks the Right is evil.’
Of course that particular belief is becoming more and more faded....
Here's the thing about US Presidential Elections: who you, I, or anyone else votes for doesn't matter one bit. We're just giving an opinion about who the Electoral College should select. The people chosen for the Electoral College are under absolutely zero obligation to vote in accordance with that opinion.Just wanted to share this from elsewhere.
As multiple states continue to find massive evidence of voter fraud and irregularities that put the initial results of the November election into question, the state of Wisconsin is now set to conduct a full forensic audit of the 2020 election “in the coming days,” according to an announcement by Wisconsin State Representative Janel Brandtjen (R).
After the groundbreaking forensic audit hearing in Arizona that revealed massive evidence of voter fraud and irregularities, and as states like Georgia and Pennsylvania continue to discover voting discrepancies that put the original results of the 2020 election into question, the state of Wisconsin has announced that it will conduct a full forensic audit of the 2020 election, according to a statement released by State Representative Janel Brandtjen. “The people of Wisconsin deserve to know the truth about the 2020 election.”
“The state of Wisconsin allows 22 months after an election to investigate irregularities, and 2020 had plenty of them. I appreciate the legislative efforts to restore confidence in our election system, and support the complementary investigative efforts underway to look into localized concerns. However, it is clear that further action is warranted by the Assembly Campaigns and Elections committee to look into the broader issues that have been raised, and I am grateful for the support of my colleagues in this effort. It is understandable that private citizens and citizen groups have been seeking to conduct their own investigations that their elected representatives have failed to do, but it is important that they be conducted in the most transparent and coordinated way possible,” Brandtjen wrote.
The statement continues, “The amount of absentee voting taking place has exposed issues surrounding ballot curing, ‘indefinitely confined’ electors, ballot harvesting and how our tabulators actually work. As I’ve traveled around our state as Chair of the Campaigns and Elections committee, voters have made it clear that they want a thorough, cyber-forensic examination of tabulators, ballot marking devices and other election equipment, which I will be helping facilitate on behalf of the committee as the chair.”
“The questionable dissemination and application of guidance by the Wisconsin Elections Commission, the repeated failure to follow state elections law by liberal partisan clerks, and the recent revelation of the tens of thousands of new registrations and votes cast by individuals whose driver’s license number, name, and date of birth did not match and were subsequently removed from the state system after their votes were recorded, are simply outrageous. I think these are legitimate concerns, and our oversight has not kept up with current election technology,” said Brandtjen.
“It is clear there are those who continue to oppose more rigorous examinations of election materials in favor of moving on, or were not displeased with the results of the November 2020 election,” she continued. “However, if Wisconsin is to have a credible election system, we must keep up with the technology and perform a full forensic and transparent audit. It is incumbent upon myself and the Campaigns and Elections committee to ensure the records essential to the most rigorous and intensive review are made available to the professionals with the greatest capability to conduct it, and increase election process transparency, in order for the public’s confidence to be assured, and that is exactly what I will do.”
As the dust settles in the wake of the disputed Nov. 3 presidential election, an increasing number of Americans are skeptical of its outcome, with more voters now favoring forensic audits to affirm the authenticity of the stated results.
A majority of likely U.S. voters — 55 percent — support forensic audits to ensure there was no voter fraud, according to a new Rasmussen Reports poll. Twenty-nine percent oppose such audits, and 17 percent are not sure how they feel.
The poll, which surveyed 900 likely voters, was conducted June 20-21 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.
According to the report, a whopping 41 percent of likely voters do not believe Democrat Joe Biden won the presidential election fairly.
This is a significant increase since February, when just 34 percent said they believed fraud affected the outcome of the race.
In Rasmussen’s April poll, that number had climbed to 51 percent.
In the latest poll, more Republicans (71 percent) than Democrats said they support forensic audits, like the one being conducted in Arizona. However, a surprisingly high amount of Democrats (38 percent) also support such audits.
A solid majority (57 percent) of independent voters also want a forensic audit of the November election.
A forensic audit is different from a vote recount, which merely recounts the same ballots (including batches that could potentially be marred by fraudulent votes).
A forensic audit includes a thorough examination of voting machines, including:
There’s been speculation for months that fraud in five key swing states — Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin — could have affected the outcome of the election.
- Analyzing if election equipment software and hardware were vulnerable to hacking.
- Confirming that no votes were switched during the vote count.
- Testing that tabulators were not sending or receiving information over the internet during the vote count.
Just as voter sentiment has shifted since November, so have the narratives being pushed by Democrats and their corporate media partners.
Their first reaction was to claim, in unison, that there was no voter fraud and to vehemently attack anyone who suggested otherwise.
After a while, they switched to insisting that even if there were voter fraud, it was not enough to overturn the election.
Now, the tactic is to smear anyone who questions the outcome of the election as a “domestic terrorist” trying to “subvert democracy.”
In other words, you’re attacking democracy itself if you’re concerned about the bizarre irregularities of the election, including stunning revelations uncovered in the Arizona audit.
According to the new Rasmussen poll, “Democrats (56%) are more likely than Republicans (47%) or unaffiliated voters (38%) to believe that expressing doubt about the outcome of elections undermines democracy in America.”
Of course, the farcical irony is that Democrats and the left-wing media spent the past four years screeching nonstop — without evidence — that Russia had rigged the 2016 election for former President Donald Trump.
Now, even questioning the 2020 election could get you banned from social media and canceled by left-wing mobs.
The specter of voter fraud has far-reaching tentacles that are not going away anytime soon, despite the coordinated efforts of Big Tech, the Democratic Party and the establishment media to silence anyone who questions the 2020 election.
Until these issues are resolved and confidence in the integrity of the election process is restored, many Americans will suspect that our votes don’t count.
Even those who just want to sweep the Nov. 3 election under the rug because they fear the Pandora’s box it might unleash must realize that this problem won’t go away just because they try to ignore it.
Probably, and it's going to land Twitter in a shitshow of a court case again.
Oh look....someone's panicking....
Is completely uncalled for, and trying to create some invisible connection between the two is really dumb.
That looks EXACTLY like him to me. He has the same hair pattern, the same facial structure, same bags under his eyes... Same eyebrows. If you look closely at his right eyebrow (our left) it has a very distinct wrinkle right above it that is the same in both pictures. Another thing you can see is a small cartilage protrusion from his nose right about his left (our right) nostril on the bridge of his nose...
Very clearly the same person in my opinion.
He just admitted he prefers undercover and anonymity at the hearing. Of course, he does.
I have no doubt something is going on "behind the scenes", but what is the more apt question.@Jormungandr maybe your right and I am seeing things and can’t having shadows. Still the resemblance is curious enough that I thought it worth sharing and given how cagey the events on the 6th are, I’m all but certain some sort of Deep State shenanigans or manipulation happened there.
Oh dear what did they do to be suspended from Twitter, I wonder? Sounds like a lawsuit to me.
Oh look....someone's panicking....
Which Twitter will certainly win because their TOS includes this little gem:Oh dear what did they do to be suspended from Twitter, I wonder? Sounds like a lawsuit to me.
Twitter TOS said:We may suspend or terminate your account or cease providing you with all or part of the Services at any time for any or no reason
Indeed. Hopefully it won’t take a decade or three before concrete answers come to light.I have no doubt something is going on "behind the scenes", but what is the more apt question.
"WoRst aTtAck SincE 9/11!"