News of the Amused

ATP

Well-known member
Can you even see reality from whatever world it is you live in?

While it's true that the Democrat Party have been treasonously sympathetic in both attitude and deed towards the socialists at least since FDR, with the exception of JFK, don't confuse our traitors for the totality of America.

I do not talk about common people or military,but ruling elites.With exception of Reagan presidency they ALWAYS supported soviets.
What Reagan did,was start military building,stop technology leaks for soviets and made oil cheap.After 6 years,they agree to surrender.
Every other president could do the same.

Not mention,that in 1946 when USA officially sold us to soviets,they have mass produced A bombs with B.29 capable of reachinh most of soviet territory.Soviets had army of slaves,which once/1941/ mass surrender when strong enemy attacked.

USA could defeat soviets easily till 1951,when they learned how made A bombs for their B.29 copy.

Till 1962 soviets had no means to deliver bombs to USA.Yet - USA not only do not destroyed country which officially wanted to conqer entire world including USA,but supported it economically.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
I do not talk about common people or military,but ruling elites.With exception of Reagan presidency they ALWAYS supported soviets.
What Reagan did,was start military building,stop technology leaks for soviets and made oil cheap.After 6 years,they agree to surrender.
Every other president could do the same.

Not mention,that in 1946 when USA officially sold us to soviets,they have mass produced A bombs with B.29 capable of reachinh most of soviet territory.Soviets had army of slaves,which once/1941/ mass surrender when strong enemy attacked.

USA could defeat soviets easily till 1951,when they learned how made A bombs for their B.29 copy.

Till 1962 soviets had no means to deliver bombs to USA.Yet - USA not only do not destroyed country which officially wanted to conqer entire world including USA,but supported it economically.

The FDR administration was absolutely riddled with Communist spies and traitors, and the Democrat Party has been as sympathetic to them as they have been towards every other type of elitist authoritarian.

That's a fair accusation. The way you chose your words in your prior post though, didn't say 'the ruling elite' or any such thing, it said 'The USA.'

Say what you mean.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
IKE was also against commies because he knew militarily what they were capable of.
He told off the red scare guy because he was doing it for the wrong reason and would have turned people on each other
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
IKE was also against commies because he knew militarily what they were capable of.
He told off the red scare guy because he was doing it for the wrong reason and would have turned people on each other

I still have yet to be convinced the 'red scare' was a bad thing.

Given the number of communist spies and traitors who were in and working for the government, I still don't get why I'm supposed to believe it was paranoia or the like, rather than a very real threat and problem, that caused the 'red scare.'

Of course, the political left has been doing revisionist history since the moment the thing began.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
IKE was also against commies because he knew militarily what they were capable of.
He told off the red scare guy because he was doing it for the wrong reason and would have turned people on each other
Except history has shown McCarthy's fears were justified and that he probably underestimated the issues with commies moving into/sneaking into US institutions/media groups/academia, and that Ike was too naive or too optimistic about the US populace.

McCarthy, Patton, and McArthur were all right about the commies and how to handle them, which is why they were removed from power, or just killed in an 'accident' like Patton.
 

Typhonis

Well-known member
Mac was an idiot. He wanted to expand a war the US was in no way ready to fight. The rifles the troops had were red line. They had to yank Shermans off of displays to have tanks to fight with and we were pulling in reservists by the bucketload.

China could afford to send more men. They had trained troops from 49 and were on the Korean border. There was no way in hell Mac could stop them and Truman knew it.
 

LordsFire

Internet Wizard
Mac was an idiot. He wanted to expand a war the US was in no way ready to fight. The rifles the troops had were red line. They had to yank Shermans off of displays to have tanks to fight with and we were pulling in reservists by the bucketload.

China could afford to send more men. They had trained troops from 49 and were on the Korean border. There was no way in hell Mac could stop them and Truman knew it.

Of course he could have. That would have required the use of nuclear munitions though, and that was questionable.

Beyond that though, that's a situation that was set up because the political left in the US killed support for the nationalists, allowing the Soviet-backed Communists to win the Chinese civil war in the first place.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
Mac was an idiot. He wanted to expand a war the US was in no way ready to fight. The rifles the troops had were red line. They had to yank Shermans off of displays to have tanks to fight with and we were pulling in reservists by the bucketload.

China could afford to send more men. They had trained troops from 49 and were on the Korean border. There was no way in hell Mac could stop them and Truman knew it.
Nukes would have allowed Mac to deal with Mao, and saved us decades of problems with the CCP (likely including the Wu Flu).

But Truman wasn't willing to go that far to deal with the CCP threat, and we are all paying for it now.
 

The Whispering Monk

Well-known member
Osaul
I still have yet to be convinced the 'red scare' was a bad thing.

Given the number of communist spies and traitors who were in and working for the government, I still don't get why I'm supposed to believe it was paranoia or the like, rather than a very real threat and problem, that caused the 'red scare.'
Remember, the left controlled the media then too.

There was no conservative 'voice' at the time b/c there was no other means of consumption outside of that control.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
IKE knew what he was doing.
The people would turn on each other for the cry of "THEY ARE A CPMMIE!"
I mean, IKE was all for sticking it to the commies but without getting countless Americans killed
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder
IKE knew what he was doing.
The people would turn on each other for the cry of "THEY ARE A CPMMIE!"
I mean, IKE was all for sticking it to the commies but without getting countless Americans killed
How many Americans have the CCP killed throughout the years, even before we get to the Wu Flu?

Face it, Ike was naive and wrong, McCarthy and MacArthur were both right, and modern history shows this.

We are paying the price for not heeding the warnings of people like McCarthy and MacArthur when they tried to warn us about what the USSR and CCP represented and we're doing in our domestic areas.
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
How many Americans have the CCP killed throughout the years, even before we get to the Wu Flu?

Face it, Ike was naive and wrong, McCarthy and MacArthur were both right, and modern history shows this.

We are paying the price for not heeding the warnings of people like McCarthy and MacArthur when they tried to warn us about what the USSR and CCP represented and we're doing in our domestic areas.
Mccarthy was a scare tactic user trying to paint a worse picture.
Most of the commies that came to power, arrived AFTER IKE and Mccarthy were out.
IIke knew the commies better since he had whey they could do
Mac also wasn't allowed because combat would just be nuking each other casually
 

Zachowon

The Army Life for me! The POG life for me!
Founder
I've yet to see any evidence this was the case. It's just an 'Everyone knows' kind of thing, as best as I can tell created by the leftist media establishment.
Perhaps.
I will have to do more research myself
 

Bear Ribs

Well-known member
Getting away from commies and back to something amusing...


In the ongoing investigation of the Aliso Canyon Gas Leak, Halliburton claims the key evidence was stored only on one computer, which was stolen from their car in a Best Buy parking lot, sorry no evidence left anymore to be subpoena'd.

I know Halliburton kinda has a reputation for destroying evidence but even by their standards, this is a bit much.
 

Urabrask Revealed

Let them go.
Founder
Getting away from commies and back to something amusing...


In the ongoing investigation of the Aliso Canyon Gas Leak, Halliburton claims the key evidence was stored only on one computer, which was stolen from their car in a Best Buy parking lot, sorry no evidence left anymore to be subpoena'd.

I know Halliburton kinda has a reputation for destroying evidence but even by their standards, this is a bit much.
They do realize that by making a mockery out of the law, they lose this thin line pf protection against the people going "Right. Lynching it is", right? Or are they too arrogant to imagine such a situation?
 

Cherico

Well-known member
Getting away from commies and back to something amusing...


In the ongoing investigation of the Aliso Canyon Gas Leak, Halliburton claims the key evidence was stored only on one computer, which was stolen from their car in a Best Buy parking lot, sorry no evidence left anymore to be subpoena'd.

I know Halliburton kinda has a reputation for destroying evidence but even by their standards, this is a bit much.

Tampering with evidence just adds more crimes to be charged with.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top