Public access was allowed on the lawn and outside the White House it was not granted inside at all. You couldn't just walk in without some kind of permission. The secret service very much existed then and I guarantee you anyone trying to get in the White House would get a very rude awakening
YOu are provably wrong. Nn at least one occasion during WWII, when security was (at least supposedly) a lot tighter than in 1936, a man simply walked in to the white house and joined FDR and family watching a movie - they only noticed him when the lights came up at the end of the movie. And that's getting into FDR's private residence, not the busy west wing, and remember no photo IDs in this time period.
The SI knows what marketing strategies to use because he literally comes from the future.
Wrong. Even if he was a marketing expert and actually kneww all the details of some marketing campaign or other that would not tell him what marketting to use because a successful marketing campaign in 1939, could be a complete failure in 1936. More importantly, he's not going to know all the details, he might remember some things in general, but there's no way to tell what details were what made the campaign successful, and many of the "inventions" you mentioned were only successful because of cultural or infrastructure elements that don't exist yet in 1936.
Ur right he doesn't have connections which is exactly why he would go to a bank to pitch his patents to get a head start and be able to reach out to bigger companies to use his patents. He really doesn’t have to start any businesses
You have no idea how patents work, do you?
You don't go to a bank for a patent, you go to a lawyer, whom you pay, often quite a lot of money, to take detailed drawings and often an actual working example and convert them to a valid patent application that will protect your invention. He will then send it to the US patent office and weeks/months letter they'll respond with, not a patent number but questions about the patent, and you'll need to pay the lawyer to answer them.
To take for example the Hula hoop the patent was applied for in in 1959 and wasn't granted till 1963. That is fairly typical of the time frame needed for a patent to be granted when there were no challenges, and without the "patent application number" that wasn't established until decades later, you can't go selling this without risking it getting stolen or a long and expensive legal battle.
And this of course assumes that you can actually describe the thing in sufficient detail to get a patent. Here's a challenge for you - try and describe a Hula Hoop with enough detail someone in 1958 would grant you a patent. I just read the patent and it's considerably more complex than most people would think.
Even if you don't like my patent and oil idea I don't see how breaking into the White House to confront FDR is a good idea in any rational or reasonable sense. The scenario that's in the second chapter is laughably unrealistic
The scpecific scenerio in the first version of the chapter had some issues, but your objections do not reflect the actual conditions historically, and while there are better ways to go about it, your plans are much worse and make absolutely no sense.
A brief note on vending machines... even in the late 1970s I remember blank steel plugs being used to steal plays from arcade machines.
Good to know. I thought the precise weight measurement was established long before that.
As mentioned all of his UT US currency is now highly illegal (counterfeit) given it represents itself as US legal tender.
Except it doesn't.
Coins don't say on them "legal tender" or anything of the sort so as long as they are sold as collector's items they are not illegal.
I suppose if someone deliberately wanted to cause trouble they could make a case, but I doubt anything would happen even then.
Any coin collector will know it and probably show him the door
I'm pretty sure you're wrong, although the market for "novelty coins" aka fake coins at the time seems to have been smaller than I assumed.