It's why laws need to be phrased as simply as possible.
Also lobbyists should all be thrown in blacksites...kidding..mostly
I agree with the first part. I think politicians and their immediate family getting money or anything else needs to have strict laws. People getting new jobs after their parents are in office should be looked at closely. Cough Hunter cough.
They had a child and were married.
But yeah..Spinsters shouldn't be allowed to vote tbh.
Neither should 47 year old men who proudly declare their lack of progeny. you're too much of a selfish piece of shit to be allowed to exercise force over peoples lives.
I think that having children can be a big personal choice. The same reason why there should not be limits on having kids, the reverse should also be true. I prefer freedom of choice, limiting that choice or any choice is not good.
Doing nothing is why America is about to die and with it, the whole damn free world though.
A bit doom and gloom. America has a very robust system that can change quickly if people are in agreement, but is slow if there is disagreement. This concept is a key point of how America works and why it works. I would agree that a change would be nice, but hard to implement. If there is a change, I would say my share system is the best alternative.
Proxy voting is one of the biggest destroyers of civilizations dude.
People are giving up their vote and they can buy their vote back. It is a personal choice. This is different than people being purposely disenfranchised. No inheritance and a cap on total votes prevents super accumulations from building up. Rich people could buy a bunch of votes for their kids, but their kids might sell said votes once their parents die to get that money. The more people want to vote, the more money will be spent to get said vote and transfer that money outwards.
