Personally, I think Dark Empire did the galaxy crossing superweapon better than in The Force Awakens and it should have been part of the final battle in the Rise of Skywalker.
Starkiller was like .. whatever. Just a bigger galactic ranged Death Star... Sure okay. Galaxy Gun was neater. And World Devastators in my humble opinion are just cool.
Those Xyston-Class Destroyers were just boring and uncreative. I liked Palpatines Force Storm he showed off way more in that film. Very suitably epic.
I mean stopping Palpatine and a fleet of Star Destroyers seems like enough of a rallying call on its own without the twenty thousand planet killing plot devices.
When you look at the core elements, the sequel trilogy turned into a shittier do-over of the exact parts of the original EU that were considered dodgy by the fans:
-- Palpatine coming back and having a secret cache of superweapons on a planet hidden by space anomalies?
Dark Empire did that already.
-- The baddies having "
even BIGGER superweapons that are WORSE than the Death Star"? Already seen in a number of EU books from the '90s, with the Sun Crusher and the Darksaber catching particular flack due to "superweapon fatigue".
-- A son of Han and Leia turning evil? Already done to Jacen by Troy Denning.
-- A grandchild of Palpatine running around? Core conceit of the atrocious (but unintentionally hilarious)
Jedi Prince series.
It should be noted that the
Dark Empire comics, the Jedi Academy trilogy, the 'Callista' trilogy, the entire 'Denningverse' and the
Jedi Prince series have all had considerable numbers of detractors from the start. If, in 2014 or so, you'd hypothetically announced that you wanted to take inspiration from the best of the EU and asked SW fans for their favourites... these particular entries would
not have made the cut.
And then they somehow managed to not only base their trilogy on elements and ideas from these works... they managed to do it
worse this time around. That'almost an accomplishment. It takes a special kind of incompetence to fail so excessively.
--------------------------------------------
The third film was in a rough spot though. Following up the terrible plot that The Last Jedi left the series with would always be a big challenge. How to drag and pull the trilogy back and wrap it up in one film... While still treating The Last Jedi as completely canon. An unenviable task.
Far be it from me to deny that Rian Johnson is the directorial equivalent of an arsonist, but the director of TRoS -- one J.J. Abrams -- is hardly without blame here. He's the fucktard that always relies on stupid empty mystery boxes. He's a zero-substance filmmaker, to the point that I genuinely believe that Michael Bay(!) is his superior by a not-insignificant margin.
Yes, Johnson was a total dick. He deliberately set the whole Potemkin village on fire, ruining eerything that looked remotely decent, and giving the audience a charred, hollow carcass. Johnson is a pathetic little sadist who no doubt strokes his dick to the idea of making a film that fans hate.
But Abrams is the one who
built the Potemkin village, instead of something real. So he can go hang, too. There's a kind of poetic irony in the fact that he ended up holding the bag of flaming excrement. He may not have set it on fire, but he sure was the one that put the turd in the bag to begin with! (Or in the mystery box, if you will...)