Star Trek The General Star Trek Thread - From TOS to Corporate Schenanigans

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Um Shattner is not a Boomer. Shattner is from the Silent Generation. ;)

Part of the joke I'm pretty sure. All old people are Boomers apparently including Mike from the video... Even though he used to be the same age as Jay.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
The Covert Conspiracy to smuggle James Doohan's (Chief Engineer Montgomery Scott on the The Original Star Trek) ashes onto the International Space Station revealed!

 

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
I really don't understand the optimism people have for upcoming shows like "Strange New Worlds." It seems to me that a lot of people who I see criticizing STD, or, at least admit the show could be better, seem to be misidentifying what exactly the problems with the show are. It's true that there's the window dressing issues of what things look like, and it does just add to the list of things wrong with the show (along with STP, for that matter), but the main ideas I see getting tossed around are "it's too dark and gritty" and "it's too serialized." These are not what the main problems are - DS9 was dark and gritty, and executed serialized stories quite well, and even ENT was at its most popular during a season-long story-arc that got pretty dark and gritty. The obsession with the idea that going back to self-contained episodes and/or trying to be bright and optimistic again is exactly the same misunderstanding with what made TNG work that resulted in the mediocrity that was VOY and the first two seasons of ENT. No, the main problems with new Star Trek are that it takes its audience for granted, and that the writing is just plain horrible. It has some of the most cringe-worthy lines spoken by cardboard-cutout characters meant to "represent" groups of people, written by people who have no understanding of science but who have had the idea that it's cool and important drilled into their heads from a young age. They have no understanding of what makes characters interesting, or how to make them unique and memorable, how to write interesting, compelling stories, or even how to make a basic story structure. STD's main character is a Sue, and all of the new shows made by Secret Hideout are just a soapbox with which to preach regressive left politics, as admitted by the people running the shows themselves. The politics are always going to outweigh story, which is why the story is always going to be sub-par, no matter if they promise to drop the grim-dark and go back to episodic story-telling like SNW is supposed to be or not - it's made by the same people. I mean, I bash on Abrams Trek, too, for being dumbed down dumb action movies, but while they were vacuous style-over-substance popcorn movies sold entirely on nostolgia while trying to seem "cool" and "hip" to the young crowd, at least they generally weren't trying to preach politics at you. At worst, they were just the generic good guys vs. bad guys stories that are made for "general audiences."

The excuses for "Lower Decks" are also some of the lamest things I've ever seen, too. From the trailers, it was pretty obvious that this was made for grown-ups who are at least pop-culture familiar with Star Trek and its various tropes, not to mention the jokes involving adult situations, but this has somehow shifted to "it's intended to attract children to the franchise." Not only is this a bald-faced lie, but it's also extremely patronizing to kids. Many, many people got into Star Trek as kids, as in TOS, TNG, DS9, and such, and then quite a few of them were inspired to go on to be engineers and scientists and the like, yet starting with VOY, it seems like there's been this attitude pervading the writers' room that the people watching the show are stupid, even when they'd turn around and brag about all the smart people who were inspired to go into STEM fields because of Star Trek. This seems to be an attitude that has continued, or is otherwise excused by rationalizing it as a way of making it more appealing to a wider audience (because the general audience is stupid, apparently). Of course, I also suspect at least some of it is because the people writing these shows aren't terribly bright themselves... 😏

Anyway, I continue to be pessimistic about the current state of Star Trek as well as its foreseeable future. The only way any improvement is going to happen is if Secret Hideout loses Star Trek and some people who actually give a shit about it and actually know how to write are put in charge of the franchise. I mean, is anyone else curious what Nick Meyer might have come up with? What's Manny Coto up to these days?
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
The story is from January the 5th of this year but apparently it's very unconfirmed but while Avery Brooks has apparently been busy in his post-acting career focusing on his music and theater, according to Cirroc Lofton (who played Jake Sisko on Deep Space Nine) Avery Brooks was allegedly blacklisted from Hollywood for some reason to the point that he doesn't even have an Agent which explains his apparent utter lack of a film or television career as of late.

 

DocSolarisReich

Esoteric Spaceman
Wouldn’t supirse me. Given his attitude towards how and why he played Sisko, I wonder if there’s a connection. Maybe he refused to play the woke game or something

Sounds like he refused to take the ticket and provide kompromat on himself at one of those parties.
 

bullethead

Part-time fanfic writer
Super Moderator
Staff Member
I mean, the guy did come off as crazy when Shatner interviewed him for that one documentary, but I can see him burning bridges for being hard to work with and/or that whole "I would've quit if it weren't for a promise to my son" thing (although that was before the writers really got the character to align with Brooks' strengths).
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
I mean, the guy did come off as crazy when Shatner interviewed him for that one documentary, but I can see him burning bridges for being hard to work with and/or that whole "I would've quit if it weren't for a promise to my son" thing (although that was before the writers really got the character to align with Brooks' strengths).

Mmmm this makes me want to actually watch it now. From what I heard William Shatner's Captains documentary was more about Shatner and less about the supposed actual topic of the film, interviewing the other Trek Captains.
 

commanderkai

Establishing Battlefield Control...Standby
Moderator
Staff Member
Mmmm this makes me want to actually watch it now. From what I heard William Shatner's Captains documentary was more about Shatner and less about the supposed actual topic of the film, interviewing the other Trek Captains.

It's been a while since I watched it, but I didn't think it was as bad as people say. It was still quite interesting to see, even though Shatner has an ego.
 

Husky_Khan

The Dog Whistler... I mean Whisperer.
Founder
Anyone else excited to talk about Alex Kurtzman being given a five year contract extension (some would say a five year mission) for his exemplary work in Star Trek and it's Kelvin Timeline shenanigans? :D


And look Trekfans, your getting TWO MORE new television shows because of this development!


One set in Starfleet Academy!!!

Starwarts! Hogtrek?

Plus a Strange New Worlds spinoff starring Captain Pike... whatever that means. I haven't seen any of the new Trek stuff. I just felt compelled to share.

Also Wandavision Director Matt Shakman is directed a new Star Trek movie after Quentin Tarantino's efforts fell away. Basically the same level of quality though I'm sure.
 

Terthna

Professional Lurker
Anyone else excited to talk about Alex Kurtzman being given a five year contract extension (some would say a five year mission) for his exemplary work in Star Trek and it's Kelvin Timeline shenanigans? :D


And look Trekfans, your getting TWO MORE new television shows because of this development!


One set in Starfleet Academy!!!

Starwarts! Hogtrek?

Plus a Strange New Worlds spinoff starring Captain Pike... whatever that means. I haven't seen any of the new Trek stuff. I just felt compelled to share.

Also Wandavision Director Matt Shakman is directed a new Star Trek movie after Quentin Tarantino's efforts fell away. Basically the same level of quality though I'm sure.
Either Kurtzman has some absolutely killer blackmail material on ViacomCBS executives, or nobody in charge over there has any clue how to run a business. Here's a hint; it involves selling things people want to buy, not shaming them into buying things they don't want.
 

bullethead

Part-time fanfic writer
Super Moderator
Staff Member
Here's all the Trek Day news:

Dunno why they went with a shittier version of the TOS designs than Discovery's. They just needed to lose the collars and it would've been fine.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top