The Americas The Tyranny of Trudeau's Canada

TheRomanSlayer

Unipolarity is for Subhuman Trogdolytes
In some actually positive Canadian news for a change, she did! Smith and the UCP (Alberta's provincial-level conservative party for the non-Canadian readers) have resisted a nonstop media barrage trying to paint them as fascist mini-Trumps to remain in power. The Alberta NDP picked up seats but not enough to oust the former, unlike what some over-optimistic polls and the Canadian subreddits predicted. Furthermore one development that both sides can celebrate is the ouster of former provincial Minister of Health Tyler Shandro, who enforced lockdowns across Alberta under Smith's predecessor Jason Kenney and specifically pushed law enforcement to go after high-profile resisters like Pastor Artur Pawlowski - he was among the UCP MPPs who lost their seats this round.
Fort MacMurray, Edmonton and Calgary had unfortunately taken the NDP route, but at least rural Alberta have Smith the victory.
 

Circle of Willis

Well-known member
Fort MacMurray, Edmonton and Calgary had unfortunately taken the NDP route, but at least rural Alberta have Smith the victory.
Unfortunately those cities are lost for the foreseeable future, what with Calgary having elected two back-to-back corrupt woke hacks in Nenshi & Gondek - the latter, their incumbent, being a woman who's more interested in banning protesting drag events than doing anything to improve her city - and Edmonton being the NDP's longtime stronghold in AB. It's nice to see that the rural ridings came in clutch, but demographics-wise I don't think they can keep that up forever.

Still, to paraphrase a famous fictional king: there may come the day when even Alberta falls to the tide of intersectional deconstructionism. (We can set aside the 2015 election because the right had been more divided than ever & the PCs went full retard under Prentice that time, plus the ANDP was thrown out of power one electoral cycle later once the right-wingers got their shit together) But it's not this day. This day, Albertans fought and thanks to their efforts, sanity won.
 

TheRomanSlayer

Unipolarity is for Subhuman Trogdolytes
Unfortunately those cities are lost for the foreseeable future, what with Calgary having elected two back-to-back corrupt woke hacks in Nenshi & Gondek - the latter, their incumbent, being a woman who's more interested in banning protesting drag events than doing anything to improve her city - and Edmonton being the NDP's longtime stronghold in AB. It's nice to see that the rural ridings came in clutch, but demographics-wise I don't think they can keep that up forever.

Still, to paraphrase a famous fictional king: there may come the day when even Alberta falls to the tide of intersectional deconstructionism. (We can set aside the 2015 election because the right had been more divided than ever & the PCs went full retard under Prentice that time, plus the ANDP was thrown out of power one electoral cycle later once the right-wingers got their shit together) But it's not this day. This day, Albertans fought and thanks to their efforts, sanity won.
Banning protests against drag queen story hour. Geez, not even Weimar Germany had reached that stage in terms of what the fringe right called degenerate behavior. The entire west is going full Weimar.
 

Bacle

When the effort is no longer profitable...
Founder


White woman teacher in Edmonton shows the mask drop while derating some Muslim kids.

They admit the LGBT groups only respect the Muslim faith out of an expectation the Muslims 'return' the respect by attending Pride Month events, and compare not attending those events to wanting to toss gays off roofs and says they aren't Canadian if the don't support Pride shit.

This is a wake up to any Muslims who still think white liberals in Canada tolerate their faith for anything other than leverage for their own political goals.
 

Jormungandr

The Midgard Wyrm
Founder


White woman teacher in Edmonton shows the mask drop while derating some Muslim kids.

They admit the LGBT groups only respect the Muslim faith out of an expectation the Muslims 'return' the respect by attending Pride Month events, and compare not attending those events to wanting to toss gays off roofs and says they aren't Canadian if the don't support Pride shit.

This is a wake up to any Muslims who still think white liberals in Canada tolerate their faith for anything other than leverage for their own political goals.

>Muslims giving a shit about Groomers United events

...She does know that muslims in the Middle-East have "support groups" on top of buildings, right? Or if you're in Iran, they basically force you into being a trans-trender to "stop being gay", otherwise they cut off heads?

Fucking Leftoids are delusional again. smh
 

Circle of Willis

Well-known member


White woman teacher in Edmonton shows the mask drop while derating some Muslim kids.

They admit the LGBT groups only respect the Muslim faith out of an expectation the Muslims 'return' the respect by attending Pride Month events, and compare not attending those events to wanting to toss gays off roofs and says they aren't Canadian if the don't support Pride shit.

This is a wake up to any Muslims who still think white liberals in Canada tolerate their faith for anything other than leverage for their own political goals.

Lol, no worries. The moment they try to force Muslims to attend Pride events, a few Canadian teachers will get Samuel Paty'd and the rest will get the message to STFU and back allllll the way off. Trudeau loves to wail on old Mohawk grannies and unarmed Christian pastors but shits himself at the slightest sign of violent resistance, so just the worry of an out-of-season bombathon going off will be enough to guarantee that no government crackdown will occur and everyone will be expected to just quietly exempt Muslim kids from Pride participation.

Besides, even if you survive actually taking a swing at the Muslims, you would get your ass thrown in jail on hate crime charges anyway.
 

TheRomanSlayer

Unipolarity is for Subhuman Trogdolytes
Lol, no worries. The moment they try to force Muslims to attend Pride events, a few Canadian teachers will get Samuel Paty'd and the rest will get the message to STFU and back allllll the way off. Trudeau loves to wail on old Mohawk grannies and unarmed Christian pastors but shits himself at the slightest sign of violent resistance, so just the worry of an out-of-season bombathon going off will be enough to guarantee that no government crackdown will occur and everyone will be expected to just quietly exempt Muslim kids from Pride participation.

Besides, even if you survive actually taking a swing at the Muslims, you would get your ass thrown in jail on hate crime charges anyway.
True, although having a Samuel Paty like incident in Canada would more likely to enact a response from the likes of Joey DeLuca, the guy who once headed an anti-Muslim extremist group in Canada before he faded into obscurity.
 

Circle of Willis

Well-known member
True, although having a Samuel Paty like incident in Canada would more likely to enact a response from the likes of Joey DeLuca, the guy who once headed an anti-Muslim extremist group in Canada before he faded into obscurity.
Those are exactly the sort of people who the Canadian state will go to insane lengths to persecute and drive into the bedrock, though. The Muslims can Paty a teacher every other week and Trudeau'll go play dress-up in Pakistan to prove that he's in their corner but if De Luca or anyone like him so much as burns a Quran or gets into a shouting match with a hate-spewing imam on camera they'll certainly be canceled, arrested, debanked, etc. just like the Freedom Convoy protesters were, while Castro's bastard will go on TV or at least Twitter to rant about the evil Islamophobes as he did over that hijab-cutting hoax from a couple years ago. That's just how our globalist progressive anarcho-tyranny works.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Those are exactly the sort of people who the Canadian state will go to insane lengths to persecute and drive into the bedrock, though. The Muslims can Paty a teacher every other week and Trudeau'll go play dress-up in Pakistan to prove that he's in their corner but if De Luca or anyone like him so much as burns a Quran or gets into a shouting match with a hate-spewing imam on camera they'll certainly be canceled, arrested, debanked, etc. just like the Freedom Convoy protesters were, while Castro's bastard will go on TV or at least Twitter to rant about the evil Islamophobes as he did over that hijab-cutting hoax from a couple years ago. That's just how our globalist progressive anarcho-tyranny works.

You know…

Much as I hate to start on a tangent about this, I actually wonder if Right-wingers who snap might take “inspiration” from the way Muslims react whenever their faith is “challenged”?

That is, they’ll start to figure that if they became as collectively violent as pissed-off Muslims by reacting with the same sort of terrorist attacks, the same sort of violent demonstrations, and the same sort of calls to “Behead those who disrespect God!”… then all the Pride Parades, child-grooming, and libelous journos will magically vanish. Of course, it’ll actually have the opposite effect by making the Right look bad and making the Left all the more shrill and hysterical (while also killing and injuring lots of innocent bystanders, mind you), but give it a few more decades, and that’s how I see it happening.

In fact, even apart from those, I‘d actually argue the ascendancy of militant Islam — Revolutionary Iran in the Shi’ite case, as well as the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS in the Sunni one — provides a decent glimpse at what Far-Right backlash in the West could look like, if things don’t calm down now and The Establishment doesn’t cut its losses when it still can. Heck, much of the resemblance might even be deliberate, as militant Islam is sufficiently “reactionary” for providing a blueprint for “Neo-Crusader” expies of Osama Bin Laden or Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi to cite when first forming terrorist networks of their own. Sure, they may be no friends to Muslims (and in fact, may designate the Ummah to be mortal enemies of the Ecumene), but nothing’s preventing them concluding those mortal enemies had some “Neat ideas we should’ve come up with first!” or something. :(
 

The Whispering Monk

Well-known member
Osaul
Lol, no worries. The moment they try to force Muslims to attend Pride events, a few Canadian teachers will get Samuel Paty'd and the rest will get the message to STFU and back allllll the way off. Trudeau loves to wail on old Mohawk grannies and unarmed Christian pastors but shits himself at the slightest sign of violent resistance, so just the worry of an out-of-season bombathon going off will be enough to guarantee that no government crackdown will occur and everyone will be expected to just quietly exempt Muslim kids from Pride participation.

Besides, even if you survive actually taking a swing at the Muslims, you would get your ass thrown in jail on hate crime charges anyway.
I'm pretty sure this is why Trudeau has accepted 'Chinese police' into his country. The CCP has already demonstrated a complete lack of restraint when 'dealing with' their Muslim populations. No reason to expect any different behavior if the CCP gets access to anywhere else. And Trudeau can then use them as suitable deniable assets/scapegoats.
 

Circle of Willis

Well-known member
You know…

Much as I hate to start on a tangent about this, I actually wonder if Right-wingers who snap might take “inspiration” from the way Muslims react whenever their faith is “challenged”?

That is, they’ll start to figure that if they became as collectively violent as pissed-off Muslims by reacting with the same sort of terrorist attacks, the same sort of violent demonstrations, and the same sort of calls to “Behead those who disrespect God!”… then all the Pride Parades, child-grooming, and libelous journos will magically vanish. Of course, it’ll actually have the opposite effect by making the Right look bad and making the Left all the more shrill and hysterical (while also killing and injuring lots of innocent bystanders, mind you), but give it a few more decades, and that’s how I see it happening.

In fact, even apart from those, I‘d actually argue the ascendancy of militant Islam — Revolutionary Iran in the Shi’ite case, as well as the Taliban, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS in the Sunni one — provides a decent glimpse at what Far-Right backlash in the West could look like, if things don’t calm down now and The Establishment doesn’t cut its losses when it still can. Heck, much of the resemblance might even be deliberate, as militant Islam is sufficiently “reactionary” for providing a blueprint for “Neo-Crusader” expies of Osama Bin Laden or Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi to cite when first forming terrorist networks of their own. Sure, they may be no friends to Muslims (and in fact, may designate the Ummah to be mortal enemies of the Ecumene), but nothing’s preventing them concluding those mortal enemies had some “Neat ideas we should’ve come up with first!” or something. :(
Already starting to happen. In some corners of the Web that I hang out on, I'm seeing more and more Christians pointing out that nobody would dare make a 'Piss Muhammad' piece of modern ''''art'''' or talk half as much shit about Muslims as they do Christians, and that perhaps they ought to put some work into humbling those who take pride in such blasphemous degeneracy and instilling the fear of God in the hearts of heathens & unbelievers alike.

The real interesting trend I've noticed is that this is a feeling common to all denominations: Catholics, Baptists, Lutherans (who are otherwise the most chill sort of Christians I've run into online), non-denominational Evangelicals, etc. They're all getting real fucking pissed at the state of affairs in modernity, they can tell Muslims are getting results with violence and that the average modern liberal is responding with fear than by cracking down and blaspheming against Islam even harder. While none can be said to 'like' said Muslims (threads about Islamic persecution of Christians in Islamic countries aren't exactly uncommon or lacking in comments), or even each other most of the time (as I'm sure you've seen on this very board, vigorous inter-Christian theological debate is still a thing once you put some people of various denoms in one room), they absolutely despise progressives now. The latter is increasingly identified as the great common adversary and one that - by their own writings - want to exterminate Christianity as part of 'whiteness', whereas even Muslim extremists will at least be willing to tolerate the existence of small numbers of Christians as dhimmis.

As one guy I know (an Evangelical Chinese-American whose grandparents escaped from the mainland when the Communists took over) put it, paraphrasing Chiang Kai-shek: 'The Muslims are a disease of the skin, progs are a disease of the heart'. I doubt we'll get to the point of a Christian ISIS (that would look more like Gilead from Margaret Atwood's Handmaid's Tale and that's so disconnected from real historical Christian theocracies that I'm sure it's actually a leftist persecution/domination fetish fantasy, like a dystopian version of Twilight or Fifty Shades) but maybe we'll live long enough to see a latter-day Protestant beeldenstorm destroying icons of modernity, like murals of George Floyd (we have them here too BTW) or Catholics violently defending their churches from Antifa types in the Cristero tradition. Anecdotally when churches were being burned here a few years ago, I saw some Catholics preparing to do just that at the nearest parish church: they were standing guard at the church doors and Marian shrine unarmed (because Canada hasn't collapsed yet), but were all pretty big dudes that I wouldn't have wanted to throw hands with, and this was in a pretty nice neighborhood with low crime rates. (The local leftists did nothing worse than throw some orange tape up around the building at night, in the end.)

Ah well, que sera, sera - what will be, will be. If any backlash comes from the once-docile Christians who thought it was safe to hang up their swords and turn the other cheek but were then rudely disabused of that notion, let it be known that above all, the forces of the secular present have brought it on their own heads.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
Probably a topic for elsewhere, but zooming in on this bit:

I doubt we'll get to the point of a Christian ISIS (that would look more like Gilead from Margaret Atwood's Handmaid's Tale and that's so disconnected from real historical Christian theocracies that I'm sure it's actually a leftist persecution/domination fetish fantasy, like a dystopian version of Twilight or Fifty Shades) but maybe we'll live long enough to see a latter-day Protestant beeldenstorm destroying icons of modernity, like murals of George Floyd (we have them here too BTW) or Catholics violently defending their churches from Antifa types in the Cristero tradition.

Hard disagree from me, I'm afraid.

Know Hitler-worshipping fundamentalist theocrats the Wokesters fearmonger about mostly exist in their fever dreams at the moment, which I'm certainly than grateful for.

But in the long term, I envision Neo-Crusader ISIS being more inevitable than it is unlikely. After all, you had the Deutsche Christians twisting their faith into knots to accommodate Nazi ideology back in the day, and while they weren't as blatantly sadistic or prone to resurrecting literal Biblical punishments as ISIS, their example nonetheless proved it was possible for Laity led astray in service of what might as well the Devil's agenda. For one, I'm quite sure many of the SS officers who shoved Jews into gas chambers also prided themselves on being devoted Christians, as did the Catholic IRA members who set off bombs all over the place throughout The Troubles.

In which case, I think a few more decades of Worldwide Weimar followed by epic reactionary blowback could catalyze something similar, in the form of yet another hateful demagogue who twists Christianity to suit their own ends and bewitches enough Laity to go along with their Hitlerian agenda. Seen in that light, I think that what historical Christian theocracies were like hardly matters, when more "Modern" examples have proven they can get way worse than that.

Those who remain true to their faith can remind them of what Christ taught all they'd like. Odds are the Neo-Crusaders will laugh in their face, anyway, before putting them to the torch all the same — just like the Christian SS and IRA members would've.
 

Circle of Willis

Well-known member
Probably a topic for elsewhere, but zooming in on this bit:



Hard disagree from me, I'm afraid.

Know Hitler-worshipping fundamentalist theocrats the Wokesters fearmonger about mostly exist in their fever dreams at the moment, which I'm certainly than grateful for.

But in the long term, I envision Neo-Crusader ISIS being more inevitable than it is unlikely. After all, you had the Deutsche Christians twisting their faith into knots to accommodate Nazi ideology back in the day, and while they weren't as blatantly sadistic or prone to resurrecting literal Biblical punishments as ISIS, their example nonetheless proved it was possible for Laity led astray in service of what might as well the Devil's agenda. For one, I'm quite sure many of the SS officers who shoved Jews into gas chambers also prided themselves on being devoted Christians, as did the Catholic IRA members who set off bombs all over the place throughout The Troubles.

In which case, I think a few more decades of Worldwide Weimar followed by epic reactionary blowback could catalyze something similar, in the form of yet another hateful demagogue who twists Christianity to suit their own ends and bewitches enough Laity to go along with their Hitlerian agenda. Seen in that light, I think that what historical Christian theocracies were like hardly matters, when more "Modern" examples have proven they can get way worse than that.

Those who remain true to their faith can remind them of what Christ taught all they'd like. Odds are the Neo-Crusaders will laugh in their face, anyway, before putting them to the torch all the same — just like the Christian SS and IRA members would've.
I think you're misguided in trying to map developments in Nazi Germany to today's North America, just as Atwood was in trying to apply revolutionary Islamist Iran within a Christian context. Not only do people know how the Nazis' story ended, but Germany was always a vastly more authoritarian construct compared to America or Canada, as can be expected from a country united by the famously martial (bringing with it an extreme emphasis on things like discipline and regimentation) Prussians. In terms of religion it already had a strong trend of state meddling in theology, what with all the established state churches in Germany's constituent kingdoms during imperial times which survived into the Weimar Republic and then, of course, Nazi times, and Bismarck's attempted Kulturkampf to crush German Catholicism.

State churches however are absolutely not a thing in the US, and haven't been since the 1830s when the last of them were disestablished. In Canada you have the Anglican Church I guess, but they're in steep decline like all the other mainstream churches which have embraced worldly positions and nobody cares what they say, not even the Anglicans themselves. Thus, there's nothing there that can serve as the backbone to any great American equivalent to the Deutsche Christen. American and Canadian Protestants are a famously fractious bunch: extreme racist and extremist types might be able to take over one church here and there, but there's no central organization in the vein of the German Evangelical Church Confederation/German Evangelical Church that they can hijack to force every other church in the land, or even most churches, to play by their rules. You can't just ignore the specific peculiarities of a nation's history and how that historical context will inform trends when predicting these nations' future course, especially as Christian reactionaries are more likely than most (much like any other stripe of religious reactionary) to look backward to find their way forward.

Keep in mind also that the Deutsche Christen/Positive Christianity types actually failed in their drive to take over German Christianity (as evidenced by the Confessing Church's existence and most German Christians not caring for either camp). Ultimately the Deutsche Christen and Positive Christianity were both primarily pushed by pagans and occultists whose primary obsession was always racial purity and Nordic pagan woo rather than the Gospel, which was understood and held in contempt by actual practicing Christians: you can compare that to alt-right 'leaders' like Richard Spencer and Nick Fuentes today, who have already become laughingstocks mocked and despised as, respectively, a 'beefsteak' wannabe-tyrant & probable fed and an absolute degenerate everywhere. The IRA was also more nationalist (and even socialist) than it was Catholic, Catholicism being treated more-so as an extension of the Irish national identity rather than being treated as their overriding higher cause as it was in the Crusades (note that the nationalist parties claiming IRA heritage tend to be the most left-wing today).

Worst comes to worst, any ultra-violent and extreme future Christian movement in North America will at worst resemble the KKK (of which, to even tangentially tie this tangent to Canada, I must say there did exist a Canadian branch back in the day), not the Nazis. And even then you'd probably need, like, child-raping orgies at altars to piss North American Christians off badly enough to go that far. Demographics - what with Protestants not significantly outnumbering Catholics either in America or Canada, and Catholics being the largest single denomination but still outnumbered by the Protestants when the latter are combined - will certainly make it impossible for any single sect to assume unitary leadership and impose its dogma on the others: if they persecute anyone it'll be the liberal-progressive churches, like the United Church and Anglicans here (assuming those still exist when a proper reaction gets going, which isn't all that likely considering their demographic trends), but the instant they try to impose any order among themselves beyond at best a Nicene Creed-esque understanding of the most basic tenets of Christianity (like 'the trinity' levels of basic - Unitarians who reject that have given up being Christian at all, see modern Unitarian Universalists) any unity will break down quickly, making it inadvisable and unlikely as long as the threat of Globohomo exists. (If a pan-Christian reaction implodes and is overrun by Globohomo in turn then there won't be any Christians to turn 'ISIS' anyway.)

As to what might happen if a latter-day KKK-esque movement should decide the time has come to purge the others when the great rainbow beast of modernity lies dead, refer to our past discussions in PMs about 'fundamentalists' vs. 'ecumenists'. Speaking of which it would absolutely be for the best if you move this discussion to PMs, if you're interested still in carrying it out, because I've just had to go to the length of digging up the Canadian KKK to keep this tangent even remotely linked to the actual thread topic of Canada and horrors associated therewith.
 

Zyobot

Just a time-traveling robot stranded on Earth.
I think you're misguided in trying to map developments in Nazi Germany to today's North America, just as Atwood was in trying to apply revolutionary Islamist Iran within a Christian context. Not only do people know how the Nazis' story ended, but Germany was always a vastly more authoritarian construct compared to America or Canada, as can be expected from a country united by the famously martial (bringing with it an extreme emphasis on things like discipline and regimentation) Prussians. In terms of religion it already had a strong trend of state meddling in theology, what with all the established state churches in Germany's constituent kingdoms during imperial times which survived into the Weimar Republic and then, of course, Nazi times, and Bismarck's attempted Kulturkampf to crush German Catholicism.

State churches however are absolutely not a thing in the US, and haven't been since the 1830s when the last of them were disestablished. In Canada you have the Anglican Church I guess, but they're in steep decline like all the other mainstream churches which have embraced worldly positions and nobody cares what they say, not even the Anglicans themselves. Thus, there's nothing there that can serve as the backbone to any great American equivalent to the Deutsche Christen. American and Canadian Protestants are a famously fractious bunch: extreme racist and extremist types might be able to take over one church here and there, but there's no central organization in the vein of the German Evangelical Church Confederation/German Evangelical Church that they can hijack to force every other church in the land, or even most churches, to play by their rules. You can't just ignore the specific peculiarities of a nation's history and how that historical context will inform trends when predicting these nations' future course, especially as Christian reactionaries are more likely than most (much like any other stripe of religious reactionary) to look backward to find their way forward.

Keep in mind also that the Deutsche Christen/Positive Christianity types actually failed in their drive to take over German Christianity (as evidenced by the Confessing Church's existence and most German Christians not caring for either camp). Ultimately the Deutsche Christen and Positive Christianity were both primarily pushed by pagans and occultists whose primary obsession was always racial purity and Nordic pagan woo rather than the Gospel, which was understood and held in contempt by actual practicing Christians: you can compare that to alt-right 'leaders' like Richard Spencer and Nick Fuentes today, who have already become laughingstocks mocked and despised as, respectively, a 'beefsteak' wannabe-tyrant & probable fed and an absolute degenerate everywhere. The IRA was also more nationalist (and even socialist) than it was Catholic, Catholicism being treated more-so as an extension of the Irish national identity rather than being treated as their overriding higher cause as it was in the Crusades (note that the nationalist parties claiming IRA heritage tend to be the most left-wing today).

Worst comes to worst, any ultra-violent and extreme future Christian movement in North America will at worst resemble the KKK (of which, to even tangentially tie this tangent to Canada, I must say there did exist a Canadian branch back in the day), not the Nazis. And even then you'd probably need, like, child-raping orgies at altars to piss North American Christians off badly enough to go that far. Demographics - what with Protestants not significantly outnumbering Catholics either in America or Canada, and Catholics being the largest single denomination but still outnumbered by the Protestants when the latter are combined - will certainly make it impossible for any single sect to assume unitary leadership and impose its dogma on the others: if they persecute anyone it'll be the liberal-progressive churches, like the United Church and Anglicans here (assuming those still exist when a proper reaction gets going, which isn't all that likely considering their demographic trends), but the instant they try to impose any order among themselves beyond at best a Nicene Creed-esque understanding of the most basic tenets of Christianity (like 'the trinity' levels of basic - Unitarians who reject that have given up being Christian at all, see modern Unitarian Universalists) any unity will break down quickly, making it inadvisable and unlikely as long as the threat of Globohomo exists. (If a pan-Christian reaction implodes and is overrun by Globohomo in turn then there won't be any Christians to turn 'ISIS' anyway.)

As to what might happen if a latter-day KKK-esque movement should decide the time has come to purge the others when the great rainbow beast of modernity lies dead, refer to our past discussions in PMs about 'fundamentalists' vs. 'ecumenists'. Speaking of which it would absolutely be for the best if you move this discussion to PMs, if you're interested still in carrying it out, because I've just had to go to the length of digging up the Canadian KKK to keep this tangent even remotely linked to the actual thread topic of Canada and horrors associated therewith.

Very well; apologies for the tangent here.
 

Captain X

Well-known member
Osaul
Christians trying to copy militant Islam would be a horrible mistake, because it would only serve to prove the Leftists right, and give them an excuse to crack down on other Christians. They would not start shitting themselves the way they do with Muslims, because in their heads, Islam is coded to brown people and Christianity is coded to white people, and we will see the same kind of double standard that we already see with them in everything else.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top