And this right here just underlines how full of shit you are.
Eh, I've summarized what I've seen above. I don't expect it to really convince a libertarian with much more success than pointing out how stupid communes are convinces a communist to give up their world view. People don't work that way.
However, as someone who used to work with the college Libertarians, I've had my "actually, communes are pretty stupid" moment with libertarianism, and was helped over the threshold by Abhorsen's terrible arguments for libertarianism in that earlier thread, and none of his further arguments have done much but reinforce this opinion. I've seen too many Libertarians flip to communism, just as so many liberals last time did, to deny that there is a there there, and I've summarized above and in that earlier thread what I think the there there is, and why people can so seamlessly move from Libertarian's to communist without changing all that many beliefs.
As Bear Ribbs highlighted, Abhorsen thinks in the exact same way as the abolish the police BLM people. The solution for both in Anarchy. He's come out before that the States role is to correct injustice, and that this takes presence over self rule. The NAP seems to mean something, but can really mean anything, like "oppression" does for the communist. Complaining that regulatory capture is possible is no more useful than the communists complaining that people have to work to eat.
Every law is written to the benefit of someone. Tort requires some regulations at least on what a reasonable response is. How much of an asshole does someone have to be before I can shoot them?
You need Open and Closed spaces, Private and Communal Property. Communism attacks closed space and private property, Libertarians attack the open space and communal property necessary for the Private and Open places to exist. The end result is still Closed, communal property.