Megadeath
Well-known member
..? You realise she's now basically conceded her claims? Her case isn't trying to argue that her claims were true so they can't be defamation, but that her "opinions and legal theories" were so "wild" and "outlandish" that no reasonable person would believe them to be statements of fact. That you still believe them after that is just incredible.Indeed. The general public has at least enough evidence to make a rational inference that the Dominion Machines were made with the intent of cheating, so she is safe as long a a judge doesn't get a wild hair up their ass.
She might even have enough to make a preponderance of evidence claim, especially with the topics Dominion has lied about. Beyond a reasonable doubt is unlikely because not only has dominion been destroying evidence, so have their customers.
Without wanting to rehash the ground of why I don't believe the evidence shows what you think it does, I'd suggest that neither Sidney Powell nor her legal team agree with you. If there was meaningful evidence of significant fraud, especially involving Dominion, that would be a pretty water tight defence against the defamation suit as it completely nixes the legal requirement for "actual malice." Even showing that there's enough that's uncertain as to make a reasonable person question would be a damn sight better than the defence she's going with.I'm still fairly convinced there was fraud. I was watching Anthony Brian Logans livestream the night of the election. He was going in tallying County by county over each state, in particular Battleground states. How does Donald Trump go into the night with a clear and solid lead with virtually guaranteed victory and then at 4 am, voting is closed for the night only to miraculously find tens of thousand of Joe Biden votes long after the cutoff point?
There is a lot that has never been fully explained to my or anyone's satisfaction who has had questions.
I guarantee you had it been votes for Trump and this happened the Democrats would be screaming bloody murder. And they'd be right too. Dominion plays a part in this. To what extent can not yet be determined as no real Bipartisan investigation has taken place. And what little we have seen has raised questions and skepticism.
If she's choosing to defend herself by claiming no one could believe she was making factual statements (Which, judging by this thread and others is a bit weak.) rather than arguing that she had enough evidence to suggest it was true, it can only mean that either her and everyone else involved in her defence is too stupid to put their own clothes on, or that they don't believe they have the evidence to make her statements even plausibly true.