Elizabeth Warren staffer derides "pronoun politics" in Project Veritas release.

T

Tzeentchean Perspective

Well-known member
www.breitbart.com

Project Veritas: Elizabeth Warren Staffer Says Trans Pandering Loses Elections — 'F*cking No-Brainer'

A purported staffer for Elizabeth Warren warned pandering to the transgender community is an election loser, according to Project Veritas.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com
“At the end of the day if we’re gonna prioritize pronouns over making sure people have a decent standard of living, that’s wrong,” Alicea tells a Project Veritas journalist. “And when you come from where I come from, no one gives a fuck about a god damn pronoun. People want to know how to create a job.”
"[The Iowa LGBTQ Caucus] membership is like 20 or 30 people."
“When you put that over making sure people have decent jobs and healthcare, like, it’s a fucking no-brainer why we’re going to God damn lose an election,” he adds.
Click to expand...
Reminds me of this Tom Nichols piece:
www.usatoday.com

Ex-Republican: Do we still agree on beating Trump? After your LGBTQ forum, I'm not sure.

I'm not asking you to betray your principles, but Republican culture warriors are lying in wait. Why let them divide us where we already agree?
www.usatoday.com
When we watched CNN's LGBTQ town hall for the Democratic candidates Thursday, we had very different reactions. This is the event, you remember, where former Rep. Beto O’Rourke of Texas said he’dpunish religious institutions for refusing gay marriage, and where Sen. Kamala Harris of California started by informing us of her pronouns, and then host Chris Cuomo, after a mild and dopey joke, had to go on Twitter the next day and apologize for making light of it. This is where Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts fielded a question about traditional marriage with a sneering, smug insinuation that the only people who would ask her about that are men who can’t find a woman.

You thought it was great. You saw a ringing defense of LGBTQ rights and a reaffirmation of what Democrats stand for.

I saw it and thought: Are these people insane? Are they trying to lose the election?
Click to expand...
 
L.P.B. said:
www.breitbart.com

Project Veritas: Elizabeth Warren Staffer Says Trans Pandering Loses Elections — 'F*cking No-Brainer'

A purported staffer for Elizabeth Warren warned pandering to the transgender community is an election loser, according to Project Veritas.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

Reminds me of this Tom Nichols piece:
www.usatoday.com

Ex-Republican: Do we still agree on beating Trump? After your LGBTQ forum, I'm not sure.

I'm not asking you to betray your principles, but Republican culture warriors are lying in wait. Why let them divide us where we already agree?
www.usatoday.com
Click to expand...
Well she's not wrong, per se.

Won't vote for Warren, but her staffer at least seems about 10x saner than Bernie's.
 
I find it hilarious that even the sane Democrats are staring in horror at how fucking stupid their leadership has become. Also that they're slowly, slowly becoming disillusioned to the point of considering the jump to joining the Republicans. :ROFLMAO:
 
Lord Invictus said:
I doubt that, more likely the Democratic Party will fracture.

It’s a big tent party, but eventually you can only accommodate so many differing agendas and interests before the tarp falls off.
Click to expand...

The republican party imploded after Dubya, and their only now rebuilding themselves into a coherent party again, the democrats are next they will implode and be rebuilt this is called a political realinment and it was envitable.
 
This is a lot different from the Bernie investigation, and it actually makes me relieved that the crazies aren't on the Warren campaign. I still think Liawatha (sound it out) is a shitty choice, but she doesn't have LWDS members working for her.
 
It's rather ironic, though it exposes how some staffers don't agree with the party line, the staffers come out of it looking better for it because of not doing so. Of course their own party won't see it that way.
 
Isem said:
It's rather ironic, though it exposes how some staffers don't agree with the party line, the staffers come out of it looking better for it because of not doing so. Of course their own party won't see it that way.
Click to expand...
Thing is, the guy is shielded because none of the Dems trust PV. So he'll be fine.
 
Project Veritas whole business is embarrassing Democrats and leftists with these sort of operations.

So of course they don’t trust them.
 
Lord Invictus said:
Project Veritas whole business is embarrassing Democrats and leftists with these sort of operations.

So of course they don’t trust them.
Click to expand...

Project Veritas does more than just embarrass them. If the public at large came to believe the things that Veritas publishes?

It would be the end of the Democrat party. The things they released from Planned Parenthood alone would be enough to destroy the Democrats, because they are absolutely entrenched in the 'abortion on demand' position, and Planned Parenthood is blatantly a for-profit operation benefiting from Federal money.

So, the Democrats have to call them lairs, even though it has been proven (sometimes in court), that they absolutely are not. If any statistically significant number of Democrat voters take Veritas seriously, it's Game Over.
 
Problem is PV is viewed by Democrats and their voters as basically right wing provocateurs who at most “take statements and conversations out of context”.

And no doubt some of the things PV reveals sections of the democratic electorate agree with. And thus would not be shaken by.
 
Lord Invictus said:
Problem is PV is viewed by Democrats and their voters as basically right wing provocateurs who at most “take statements and conversations out of context”.
Click to expand...
People got infracted on SB for posting any PV thing despite them providing loads of documentation and direct video evidence.

Twits on Twatter bemoaned when PV broke a story about MSM covering up a story, and how they'd loved if some MSM broke the story about MSM covering up MSM misdeeds instead.

But no, PV is evil. If they speak, just stuff your ears and ignore everything. Especially the truth.
 
Last edited:
No wonder I got banned from SB. They have an allergic reaction to truth in general. Especially when it bursts their sacred bugaboos.
 
Guardian Box said:
People got infracted on SB for posting any PV thing despite them providing loads of documentation and direct video evidence.

Twits on Twatter bemoaned when PV broke a story about MSM covering up a story, and how they'd loved if some MSM broke the story about MSM covering up MSM misdeeds instead.

But no, PV is evil. If they speak, just stuff your ears and ignore everything. Especially the truth.
Click to expand...
Yep.

In fact a lot of my Whitehall infractions on SB just before the forced a BS perma were related to posting Veritas content. The final infraction I received was for a Veritas-related infraction, point of fact.

I see that as a badge of honor and cannot thank the shitball staff on SB enough for helping me get that badge with their partisanship and stupidity.
 
I can not believe I believed the SB staff to be fair and even handed for as long as I did.

But no, they are liars, politically we are on different planets, but far more importantly-the sheer dishonesty and shamelessness of the staff really opened my eyes.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top