Five minutes of hate news

I see. So lack of evidence is just more evidence.

What a farce. It couldn't have been murder. It's just a coincidence, and not even a helpful one for the supposed culprits.

Naw, it might have been murder, it might not have been. We don't know, but it seems to me that a corporation that has no problems letting its employees and customers die in faulty vehicles they manufacture would have no problem silencing some problematic whistleblowers before trial.
 
And there was no point in it anyway.

A whistleblower has evidence or testimony that the company/government is doing something illegally. (In specific context, cutting corners in an extremely unsafe way potentially resulting in damages, injury, or death.)

This crime, if it resulted in convictions and guilt, would not only result in major fines for the company/government, but likely for jail time for a number of top executives/politicians. Then, and perhaps more importantly, opens the corporation/government open to all sorts of law suits and further fines and money flowing out of the company. While revenues take massive hits because the brand/government's PR tanks and they become liable for fixing or paying for fixing what they fucked up.

If it was murder, the point would be to silence the whistleblower, who can no longer provide evidence or testimony. As they are dead.

This isn't rocket surgery.

Killing/Threatening whistleblowers is such old hat that there are long standing laws specifically about whistleblower protection.

Dead whistleblowers cannot testify or provide evidence. This dude dying, regardless of how or at whose hand, is a net gain for Boeing.

And given that him being dead is a gain for Boeing, and they've got fingers in a lot of pies, including government ones, killing the dude and getting away with it is probably cheaper for them in the long run.

It absolutely could've been a murder/assassination. There's plenty of motivation and point to it.
 


Looks like Proton-mail isn't as secure as some people once thought.
 
Is Ukaine a US ally now? I must have missed their accession into NATO or the senate ratifying a treaty with them.
You missed US government recognizing Russia as an adversary state.
US president also signed the Budapest memorandum containing certain promises to Ukraine.
The point is the American people can decide who is an enemy and who is an ally. If 60 percent of the population wants to ally with one country or be hostile to another. Shouldn't the government follow that?
Propose that referendum, see if anyone cares, win it if they do, stop clowning around if you lose it or if no one cares, ok?
As far as i know, the government is currently aligned with the majority of the public here, so i don't envy your chances.
PG_2023.09_nato-ukraine-russia_0-01.png
 
I did not lie.
Let's see:
Hell @Bacle wanted to punish and deport all Ethnic Russians back to Russia and hold them responsible for the actions of Putin and the current government of the Russian federation.
Is what you claimed I said, before I confronted you this time.

Then you replied with:
I apologize feel free to correct what I said, that's why I tagged you. But I remember you saying that any Russian person who is not outright anti Puttin or anti Russia should be deported back to Russia did I misremember?
Which is you admitting that what you initially claimed I said is outright false, and your knew it, but thought you'd get away with it.

You doubled down when I called you out:
I'm not lying, it's just that your "clarification" of only those who aren't outright anti Putin/Russia isn't that important it does not make you position that much better.
Where you admit you even remember my 'clarification' of the argument before, and admit you just didn't like it.

Which mean you knowingly lied about what I said when you brought the argument into this thread, just to help boost your simping for anti-Israel/anti-Jew positions.

You were deliberately lying about what I said, and hoping to get away with it, and are now back-peddling from me when I confront your lies.
 
If robots are cheaper than Chinese workers, then I'm 100% for automated American factories.
"If factories are cheaper than African slaves, then I'm 100% for abolition."

The Chinese workers prevent the robots from being developed enough to become cheaper than them, because labor-saving technology is easier than full automation and the startup costs of a new factory are increasingly ridiculous. Nobody in the pure monetary pursuit wants to be the first adopter because that company's going to be paying the most for the highest risk on the lowest reward.
 
"If factories are cheaper than African slaves, then I'm 100% for abolition."

The Chinese workers prevent the robots from being developed enough to become cheaper than them, because labor-saving technology is easier than full automation and the startup costs of a new factory are increasingly ridiculous. Nobody in the pure monetary pursuit wants to be the first adopter because that company's going to be paying the most for the highest risk on the lowest reward.
China is also willing to do large scale economic moves to take over industries that are by law and sheer scale not possible to western private businesses.
 
I mean, if it were true, it would have been long known about. I'm reminded of the Satanic panic of the '80s where there was supposedly some massive Satanic cult that was eating hundreds of babies (or something along those lines). After all, the children who went to those schools had parents they were kidnapped from. ;)
 
I mean, if it were true, it would have been long known about. I'm reminded of the Satanic panic of the '80s where there was supposedly some massive Satanic cult that was eating hundreds of babies (or something along those lines). After all, the children who went to those schools had parents they were kidnapped from. ;)
Except we recently found some secret tunnels under one of the schools that were involved in that.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top