Fuck off. No one asked for this and it sure as shit wasn't in the Tory manifesto.
so Ukip victory when?
Fuck off. No one asked for this and it sure as shit wasn't in the Tory manifesto.
First off, the voters know the score. Second, the people they voted for actively work toward the destruction of the British culture, people, and institutions. What the fuck did the British people expect when they put in these people? That they'll leave everything alone? NO. They're going to actively destroy you because that's what they want.Fuck off. No one asked for this and it sure as shit wasn't in the Tory manifesto.
so Ukip victory when?
First off, the voters know the score. Second, the people they voted for actively work toward the destruction of the British culture, people, and institutions. What the fuck did the British people expect when they put in these people? That they'll leave everything alone? NO. They're going to actively destroy you because that's what they want.
Surprise! The people who hate you and your way of life want to change it. Wow! What an unexpected turn! Who fucking cares if it wasn't in their manifesto? It has been made abundantly, explicitly clear over the last... jeez... decade or more that the people in power are active enemies to the people they rule. Fucking... if the unified response to the covid scamdemic didn't make it clear, I don't know what will.
And not all jews were smart,considering how many supported soviets - when everybody could see that it is matter of time till sralin would purge them.
Elitist? Really? I could accept that paranoia bit if you'd left it at that, but elitism? It's just reality that you get what you vote for. That's not elitism it's reality.In my not so humble opinion, this portrays a serious ignorance as to how politics and power works, and a dash of paranoia that isn't entirely applicable to the British situation. It's also filled to the brim with this unfortunate attitude some on the Right have to "normies", which verges on sneering elitism. Give it a rest.
My dude. Read what you just wrote. They aren't "vulnerable to lefty subversion" they've already been subverted. I said it a few posts back. The conservatives are already leftists. They hold the same leftist positions with a veneer of conservatism. While one hand destroys your country, the other gives you just enough to placate you. They are working in harmony to ensure people and parties that could help you reverse things are ineffective. Meanwhile, the country changes around you. And those changes are implemented by people in a death cult whose ultimate goal are the destruction of your people. They are incredibly effective at what their purpose is: the destruction of Britain and the implementation of the globalist vision of technocratic feudalism.The electorate voted for The Conservatives, which should all but imply what they wanted. Unfortunately the Conservatives are permeated by whiggery, which in of itself isn't actively out to destroy the country it's just an unfortunate side effect of being stuck in a particular way of thinking, IE, runaway Enlightenment Universalism. This also makes them incredibly vulnerable to lefty subversion as they simply don't know how to handle them due to being stuck in the same thought bubble as them. They don't actually hate us. They, like the rest of the entire British political class, are stuck in a particular way of thinking that prevents them from governing the country effectively.
Don't kid yourself. Labour were always socialists. By definition, they want, pursue, and implement policies to destroy capitalism. They were, are, always will be revolutionaries and, therefore, will always campaign for your destruction. As for smaller parties, well. As you mentioned UKIP is in collapse. I don't know anything about SDP, please elaborate.America is fortunate in that Trump effectively forced this worldview to be confronted and talked about, which is now causing it to be slowly excised from the GOP due to it not being fit for purpose. In time I have little doubt something similar will happen to the Democrats.
As for us, much like the rest of Europe and the Anglosphere, we haven't had that moment yet. At the end of the day, it is Labour (who in of themselves were once quite patriotic), which is everything bad about the current situation on steroids, or what we have at the moment. The other parties are too small and not well established enough for the public to take a chance with them.
Huh... did I say that? *checks post* Nope. Would you care to try again? I'll state this plainly. Political violence is fucking retarded. The moment bullets start flying, any chance of a good end goes away. We only get bad ends from that point on. We must work nonviolently, aggressively toward our goals from now on. Otherwise, violence will be the only solution.And if you're actually suggesting we should resort to armed rebellion, you need to seriously reassess some of your viewpoints as that is utterly unfeasible for anyone right now.
They likely had a high average IQ but also sometimes lacked common sense!
Fuck off. No one asked for this and it sure as shit wasn't in the Tory manifesto.
lol the aromas of the delicious Indian curries have corrupted their minds!
Most people don't bitch too much about the hindu immigrants they seem to asmiluate just fine.
Yeah, other than bringing in and spreading Leftism, Indian immigrants are indeed very nice. They don't murder people for eating beef in the West, after all.
That varies, the indian shopkeep who's been robbed by a pakastani gang banger is different then the one who has a programing job.
I made an interesting observation: The countries that were mostly ethnically homogenerous in 1914 are also the countries that have generally been the biggest consumers of diversity over the last several decades whereas the countries that were a part of multinational empires/countries in 1914 are also generally the countries that are the most hostile towards diversity nowadays, especially towards the culturally distant kind of diversity (such as large-scale Muslim immigration):
Even once Eastern and Central Europe opened up from Communism, there wasn't much of a hunger for diversity in those countries, other than perhaps for a small sprinkling of Vietnamese.
I guess that Western Europe simply became too bland and boring for its citizens, in addition to it of course not spending decades in the Communist/Soviet Freezer:
PEW Confirms \
There\'s a few theories that I push over and over again when discussions on European social trends come up: Communism was a \www.unz.com
Having experience with diversity is similar to having experience with a disease: you do not want to experience it again.
Unfortunately, human memory is short-lived.
Really, it would be nice for the West and/or East Asia to help build some nice cities in the developing world and subsequently help provide the upkeep for them so that Third Worlders are less compelled to move to the West.
That is what before and after pictures are for.Only problem is, they will just wreck it all and then blame the developed world for all their troubles anyway.
Only problem is, they will just wreck it all and then blame the developed world for all their troubles anyway.
Only problem is, they will just wreck it all and then blame the developed world for all their troubles anyway.