The Times had a similar article back in 2010, its behind a paywall and I can't find it now.
Of the advent of the modern paternity test, Melanie McDonagh of the Times of London writes, "It was astonishing, when the technology became available, that feminists didn't make more of a fuss about it." O rly?
jezebel.com
I don't like Jezebel but they quote portions of the article.
"The woman's prerogative of knowing who is a child's father was, when you think about it, the trump card of the sex. It accounted for the vice of jealousy in men; it made a mockery of the laws of inheritance; it made male claims to omnipotence absurd."
"The point is that paternity was ambiguous and it was effectively up to the mother to name her child’s father, or not. (That eminently sensible Jewish custom, whereby Jewishness is passed through the mother, was based on the fact that we only really knew who our mothers are.) Many men have, of course, ended up raising children who were not genetically their own, but really, does it matter?"
"At a stroke, the one thing that women had going for them has been taken away,
the one respect in which they had the last laugh over their husbands and lovers. DNA tests are an anti-feminist appliance of science, a change in the balance of power between the sexes that we’ve hardly come to terms with. And that holds true even though many women have the economic potential to provide for their children"
"DNA tests are an anti-feminist appliance of science, a change in the balance of power between the sexes that we’ve hardly come to terms with. And that holds true even though many women have the economic potential to provide for their children themselves…
Uncertainty allows mothers to select for their children the father who would be best for them. The point is that paternity was ambiguous and it was effectively up to the mother to name her child’s father, or not… Many men have, of course, ended up raising children who were not genetically their own, but really, does it matter…in making paternity conditional on a test rather than the say-so of the mother, it has removed from women a powerful instrument of choice."
"For the entire course of human history, men have nursed profound, troubling doubts about the fundamental question of whether or not they were fathers to their own children; women, by contrast, usually enjoyed a reasonable level of certainty about the matter. Now, a cotton-wool swab with a bit of saliva, plus a small fee, less than £200, can settle the matter. At a stroke, the one thing that women had going for them has been taken away,"
This opinion piece was written 2010 by a Miss Melanie McDonagh.
In essence it seems to be saying, "women have the right to dupe men", or "choose who the best father will be". And that cuckoldry was some expression of female power and subverting the patriarchy.
Basically DNA testing is anti feminist and misogynistic because it gives men the ability to determine whether or not their wives are unfaithful conclusively. And not be duped into child support. Thus it robs women of this feminine power of deception and uncertainty.
*Bolded parts for telling and emphasis.
Now I haven't seen many feminists outright agree with this, but given it was over ten years ago more probably do now.
The reality is you cannot be "alpha" without an element of physical power and the will to use it. If she hits him, and he doesnt hit back, he's physically submissive.
The reason why that happens is the law is on the woman's side. He hits back and he goes to prison. She doesn't.