Bear Ribs
Well-known member
Here's the clip, judge for yourself. Personally, I'm of the opinion they both sound masculine.What does thier Voice sound like? Masculine or feminine?:
Here's the clip, judge for yourself. Personally, I'm of the opinion they both sound masculine.What does thier Voice sound like? Masculine or feminine?:
Here's the clip, judge for yourself. Personally, I'm of the opinion they both sound masculine.
Is..that a Male to Female or a Female to male?
Wow, from what I saw, it looks like Matt Walsh won that debate. I’m honestly surprised that Dr. Phil even allowed both sides of this issue on a mainstream popular TV show. Usually the left thrives because they get to present only their side of an issue while making a straw man of their opposition.
I bet that Dr. Phil is going to catch a lot of flack for this and get a talking to from his bosses not to let it happen again.
Anyways, I wanted to share this. I bet it's actually a pretty common sentiment more or less held by lots of people.
Found it on the Twitter.
Source (which has replies from the Reddit before said Reddit thread was shut down)
Yeah that's the reason I feel it's pretty noteworthy. Like I said before having this discussion on a hugely popular mainstream show like Dr. Phil speaks to the credibility of Dr. Phil McGraw whom I know almost nothing about beyond pop culture references.
Though I do recall him being on the Joe Rogan podcast before. I can't recall any specifics, but I'm sure it was good since I liked the video and the comments seem to state as much. So maybe he is actually a person who advocates these kind of conversations happening on a national stage.
He was a forensic and criminal psychologist of some renown prior to working for Opera, he was also very good at interrogations and how to mind fuck a suspect into confessing. So it's interesting to see him approach trans issues because he spent the first half of his adult life dealing with deviant behavior and psychotics. The reason he ended up working for Winfrey and getting his own show is because I think he was an expert witness against her during the beef lobby fiasco and she was impressed it. I thiiinnkk.
Which I think is also why he's more sympathetic to trans people than most people on his side of the aisle (Can't remember if McGraw is a blue dog Democrat or a Reaganite tbh) tend to be. Because he knows the difference between the lunatics and the ones who are just trying to combat a brutal disorder that afflicts them by any means.
He also has to watch himself - Because he's heavily affiliated with Oprah and her network.
edit- He's like Maury Povich, someone who had a really interesting career prior to becoming a talk show host where he kinda got flanderized to borrow a Tvdopes phrase.
for all of his controversies, I like Dr. Phill if nothing else he's less cringy then Ellen
for all of his controversies, I like Dr. Phill if nothing else he's less cringy then Ellen
Autogynephilia, it's spelled autogynephilia, as in gynecologist. Also even if you accept the validity of Blanchard's nonsense, this is an incorrect usage. Blanchard draws a distinction between two types of "transsexuals" (both male to female), "homosexual transsexuals" who are in essence gay men who transition to have sex with men, and "autogynephiles" who are men sexually aroused by seeing themselves as women. Someone who clearly intentionally grows out and maintains a beard does not qualify as an "autogynephile" in any meaningful fashion.The fucking beard on that dude.... people trying to say it isn't autogenophelia and voyeurism for these fucking people.
This has been endlessly debunked and is completely non-credible as a serious psychological typology. The basis for his claims of autogynephilia have been found in cisgender women as well, and the typology inherently ignores female to male trans people and/or nonbinary people. Nevertheless, if you're gonna use blanchardian typology at least use it correctly lol.
Autogynephilia, it's spelled autogynephilia, as in gynecologist. Also even if you accept the validity of Blanchard's nonsense, this is an incorrect usage. Blanchard draws a distinction between two types of "transsexuals" (both male to female), "homosexual transsexuals" who are in essence gay men who transition to have sex with men, and "autogynephiles" who are men sexually aroused by seeing themselves as women. Someone who clearly intentionally grows out and maintains a beard does not qualify as an "autogynephile" in any meaningful fashion.
This has been endlessly debunked and is completely non-credible as a serious psychological typology. The basis for his claims of autogynephilia have been found in cisgender women as well, and the typology inherently ignores female to male trans people and/or nonbinary people. Nevertheless, if you're gonna use blanchardian typology at least use it correctly lol.
Similarly, voyeurism is defined as wanting to watch other people engaged in sexual activity or suffering (depending on usage), and once again, makes no sense here.
I suppose we're just supposed to believe there's been a mass coverup in academia and by every level of media organization to enable trans people to prey on children, when academia is perfectly happy to have uncomfortable conversations about abuse rates in lgbt relationships or incidence of partner violence against trans women, not infrequently by other trans women? Pull the other one.All I see is apologism for a bunch of neurologically deformed sexual predators and I'm all to happy go condense a response down to "lol nah trans people are pathological and a danger to anyone under 18 around them."
There is no debate, there is no debunking. I do not care, this should not be tolerated by our society it gets kids raped, mutilated and killed.
I suppose we're just supposed to believe there's been a mass coverup in academia and by every level of media organization to enable trans people to prey on children,.
Cis literally just means "on the near side" whereas trans means "on the far side" and this is a convention that dates back to Roman times. The Romans were hardly dehumanizing people by referring to Cisalpine gaul as opposed to Transalpine gaul now were they."Cis women" lol.
The Groomer language continues to dehumanize normal humans to justify the abnormal.
Cis literally just means "on the near side" whereas trans means "on the far side" and this is a convention that dates back to Roman times. The Romans were hardly dehumanizing people by referring to Cisalpine gaul as opposed to Transalpine gaul now were they.
Thank you for dropping all pretense of rationality and/or tact to just go "I know the transes are predators and everyone else is covering it up which is why there is no data to prove any of this" though, that was fun to see how quickly you switched gears.
Yes.
Fun fact, most child sexual abuse comes at the hands of trusted male authority figures, not random trans people!Okay groomer