FL Governor Ron DeSantis (R) signed legislation banning squatters.
But how practical is that? Something something about the law prohibiting rich and poor alike from sleeping under bridges.
FL Governor Ron DeSantis (R) signed legislation banning squatters.
But how practical is that? Something something about the law prohibiting rich and poor alike from sleeping under bridges.
Considering the Left's use of street thugs like Antifa, opening up street execution seems like far more poison than antidote. I could see a lot of "Oh I totally thought he was doing X act, so I broke into his house and killed him. So obviously I'm the hero here"Solution for all these issues: just bring back outlawry, and decree that any person committing certain acts is a homo sacer, and may be extrajudicially slain by anyone, with no legal consequence.
Problem solved. The honest citizens of any nation will readily accept the task of removing all the vermin. It'll be all done within the week.
Considering the Left's use of street thugs like Antifa, opening up street execution seems like far more poison than antidote. I could see a lot of "Oh I totally thought he was doing X act, so I broke into his house and killed him. So obviously I'm the hero here"
This is a dumber idea than leaders of African shitholes do.Solution for all these issues: just bring back outlawry, and decree that any person committing certain acts is a homo sacer, and may be extrajudicially slain by anyone, with no legal consequence.
Problem solved. The honest citizens of any nation will readily accept the task of removing all the vermin. It'll be all done within the week.
Well my issue is, I suppose, two-fold. One I want to hinder their ability to perform street executions as much as possible. While our current situation is unequitable, and I agree worrisome, removing even the pretense of accountability seems more likely to increase such attacks rather than curb them.That's already happening. You try to reject my suggestion by raising -- as a supposedly hypothetical spectre -- a thing that is already real. But presently, it's only done by them, to us. I'm simply suggesting equality of arms. Because they already act outside the law, but somehow, still get to claim its protection regardless. I'm saying we should take that protection away. Those who step outside the law should no longer enjoy its benefits, either.
I would agree and I concur that where the Law fails Citizenry have to stand up. If police are unable, or unwilling, to stop thugs from looting shopkeepers then they'll have to with likely bloody consequences.Put another way, more concretely: far-left thugs already illegaly occupy people's homes and loot hard-working people's shops. Constantly.
I'm saying that those good, upstanding people should be fully free to defend themselves and their property from the deluge of human trash that has already inundated society.
There are no random riots.The modern western right can’t do what you say for two reasons. First they are outnumbered so any random riot without government support will see them lose. Second is that the right is a simp for property rights and police forces. So outlawry won’t do what you want. Since many of the problem makers are rich liberal democrats.
It's a solution for a problem that doesn't exist. It existed in Rome with powerful criminal people having powerful private armies. We don't have a problem with leftists who are fugitives from the law in the country but no one can kill or bring them in.A smarter idea is to copy Sulla and proscriptions use government power but also entice regular people to join up by offering rewards like giving half of the proscribed persons estate to the person who kills or brings him in instead of letting their heirs take it. But most conservatives respect the property rights of their enemies because they are dumb.
The main problem with bringing that back is that it's hard for the average citizen to accurately identify an outlaw on the street, so mistake cases would be crazy.Considering the Left's use of street thugs like Antifa, opening up street execution seems like far more poison than antidote. I could see a lot of "Oh I totally thought he was doing X act, so I broke into his house and killed him. So obviously I'm the hero here"