a) Why the hell would Spain agree?
b) Brazil would still be too southern for its territory to count.
c) Why would Brazil need to be in NATO anyway? It's not like it has any neighbors that are a military threat and it cannot deal with alone.
So...NATO is expanding...
- Thread starter Free-Stater 101
- Start date
b) Brazil would still be too southern for its territory to count.
c) Why would Brazil need to be in NATO anyway? It's not like it has any neighbors that are a military threat and it cannot deal with alone.
A. It wouldn't.
B. Fair point.
C. It wouldn't. It can survive just fine without being in NATO, as you said.
Olga Tokariuk (@olgatokariuk)
Finally the day has come when Finlandization sounds like an acceptable option for Ukraine
nitter.1d4.us
bintananth
behind a desk
France and Brazil do share a land border. See: French Guiana (an integral part of France and the EU)
I highly doubt Brazil would be able to militarily deal with France without help. That drags in all of NATO ... on the French side if Brazil is the aggressor.
Even less of a reason for them to want to be in NATO and to be allowed in NATO, as France would naturally have more political pull in the alliance.
What about if Brazilian drug lords sneak into French Guiana lol?
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/U5BNNEUYQFIIXHYX7K7RLDKPJM.jpg)
Erdogan says Turkey will freeze Finland, Sweden's NATO bids if promises not kept
Turkey will freeze Finland and Sweden's NATO membership bids if the Nordic countries do not keep promises on counter-terrorism made last month, President Tayyip Erdogan said on Monday, adding he believed Sweden was "not showing a good image" for now.
www.reuters.com