Recent content by Cyan Saiyajin

2021 is a bit late to be considered a golden age comic. 😉 If you searched and this was the only other example you could find then this is apparently even more rarer a thing than I though it was. S'task mentioned the golden age, not the silver age. Although I have read a good bit of that too.

Actually as someone who used to look at Golden Age material for laughs, I'm pretty sure I've never seen this. At least from the big names.

Obvious the gender neutral bathroom that is currently being remodeled as a supply closet. ;)

On the contrary as I stated above I didn't know what you were trying to do and approached the conversation in good faith. But its clear now you calling Kyle a killer was an attempt at bait and we both know it. And if you think I am being too projecting or making too many assumptions on your...

Had you just been using killer as a synonym for murderer I would of at least thought your argument was legitimate. But its clear you intended to have this little "gotcha" lined up after your argument against Alex Jones felled apart. And this is after I tried to give you the benefit of the doubt...

I'll take this as a concession on Alex Jones, would you like to continue this part of the conversation?

No you did not. You didn't give a logical answer to my relevant scenario and answered with a "strive towards justice" line that didn't real gap the complete change in your answer. You both said that he may not be able to pay, and that was fine. And it was either that or to stop being a public...

Then why did you say both he might not be able to pay it before he died and would also accept him just not being a public risk instead? You don't seem to be coherent on this issue.

And what is justice in this case? Jones allowing to grow his business in an effort to repay those parents and make them whole? Or him stop being a "public threat"?

Oh on the contrary, if we are hypothesizing that he keeps the business afloat in order to see some sort of compensation to the parents so aggrieved by his actions that they need nearly a billion dollars to be whole again. He'll need to keep the income up so why not go even worse than he already...

Since you seem keen on responding to comments with facts and data what about my conversations with you? You've seem to have dropped them completely. Is there a problem?

That's because your tribe taught you the wrong definition of the word. Tolerance is not a synonym for agreement. I'm not sure of your complete history here but you seem tolerated just fine to me. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tolerance The word implies disagreement with an idea...

He might not be a troll he may simply be a person who hates Alex Jones, whether truly about this issue or not. And the more costly and punishing the ruling the more he encourages it. Of course the true irony would be that. If he were against Alex Jones then he should want as fair a court trial...

Did you get that from the same person that said he makes a 100 million a year by any chance? There were plenty of details in the court case that can be used in an appeal, and he is going to have plenty of opportunities to appeal it. It's clear his defending lawyer was setting up for one though...

First off no one is claiming that he makes 100 million a year, in fact the claim is his total net worth is somewhere between $135 – $270 million since he started infowars 23 years ago. And even that is a number disputed by infowars and alex jones...