You would be correct in that assessment, given their next big game Starfield offshored THE MAPS to non-developer sources lmao.
To be fair, Starfield has no voiced protagonist...But now that I think about it, now I think they only did that to cut costs, rather than improve the product lmao.
Hey, I will not accept irrational hatred of Bethesda(tm) products in this thread. Todd Howard is a visionary and a genius, the reception Fallout 76 got when it launched is evidence of this, what other game has got a 101/100 review score by totally legitimate review companies?Yes Star Field was such a piece of shit.
And I can't refund it
Voiced characters are fine in non-RPG titles, but yep, in RPG's it's really against the concept of roleplaying.
Waiting to see if Bethesda's big update destroys everyone's mods lmao.
<;3 Oh, it will break the mods. It's going to be glorious my friend!Waiting to see if Bethesda's big update destroys everyone's mods lmao.
Get some people happy with the show only to piss everyone off by breaking the mods
I don't think Fallout 3 or 4 ruined the settings. Where did I say that? I'm only pointing out flaws.There's not much to say when people are dying on the hill of metal sheds ruining the world setting apparently.
Finally something that's true
Tents that they never actually close
And if you Google the temperature in Mojave at night is the same as Boston in the day yet there's no screams of the world building being destroyed
Nah the original point was that "Bethesda ruined the world building by poorly made shacks, people would all die from cold and bugs. Impossible to survive!"
Ignoring that Fallout New Vegas came out before Fallout 4 and there was no wailing for this same flaw that they copied, so Bethesda continued the status quo and people are upset it ruined the franchise?
Fallout 76 was indeed a shit game I'm not even gonna disagree with that even though narratively speaking Fallout 76 is about rebuilding society (Which you were all complaining about)
Fallout 4/3 are fine additions to the setting and complaining that it ruined the world setting is just ignorance about the environment and history of the setting in those games
Crying that the settlements are not on par with 21st century buildings when the East Coast is supposed to be less developed narratively is pretty nitpicky.
How have you failed so horribly at googling seasonal temperatures.Tents that they never actually close
And if you Google the temperature in Mojave at night is the same as Boston in the day yet there's no screams of the world building being destroyed
You continue to make my argument out to be worse than what it is. I thought some things were dumb which I pointed out.
I don't mind them when it actually fixes the game. Stubbs the zombie was broken for ages until lately for example.
that is another thing. toss out the fucking skeletons.
I think they might have inconsistent size. some are smaller and some are larger.
I literally posted a video with time stamps of this.
It just works
they kinda suck in VNs too because voice actors usually have very very disappointing voices compared to what you imagined.
old games should get their source code released instead.
This is a crucial misunderstanding of how Bethesda titles maps work, they're 'compressed' compared to how large the 'actual' maps are supposed to be, but are supposed to still feature 'vaguely reasonable' sized towns, points of interest and so on.
Only to have WAY too early depictions of deathclaws, supermutants, enclave, bottlecaps and BoS. X_X
Immersion breaking though, canonically nobody in the entire FO4 wasteland will build a simple shack on their own, at least not in front of you, but the player can render FO3's plotline redundant by building infinite water processors out of trash.
