Search results for query: *

It is not pointless pedantics, though. Words have power, and democracy has implications. Unless you delineate a strict difference between the democracy and the republic, it is easy to start believing and convincing people that point of the republic is to introduce democracy and give all the...

Democracy is rule of the people. Direct rule of the people. Republic is a combination of democracy, aristocracy and monarchy, and that is what most countries are.

By that logic, 100% of humans should agree that monarchism is the best system in history. Fact is, we are all stupid. Only question is in what and to what extent.

That is just the "Holocaust" though. But Nazis started the war, and those casualties should not be ignored either. Although World War II casualties fall equally onto shoulders of Communists.

Uh, if they want gluten-free, there is the carnivore diet.

Sad thing is that it was so easy to believe. When reality becomes copy of satire...

Satan is giving a politician a tour of Hell. They come to a huge kettle at which a lot of demons are gathered and busy thrusting away at all the people being boiled in it with their tridents. Satan: "This is where we keep the Jews. They're a troublesome lot, these Hebrews; every time one of them...

Only 50%?

True, but that is true regardless of what kind of political system country has. Yet from my experience, somewhat authoritarian rulers may be less susceptible to foreign dominance than democratic systems - Tudjman and Susak may have been poisoned and killed by Washington globalists because they...

Because, thanks to these same Chinese patrons, they can afford to remain in hardline Communism. True. But premodern monarchies were far more than just monarchs... you might also remember that I actually consider absolute monarchies to have been patently evil idea. When Bela IV attempted to...

True to an extent. But thing about democracy (and republic to an extent) is that it largely centralizes the power while at the same time seeking to diversify it. It is an inherent contradiction that cannot really be resolved... in the end, the government becomes your judge, jury and the...

I don't think democracy / republic is a possibility to begin with. Moneyed interests brought down monarchy and old aristocracy because they were the only ones who could stand up to the big finance head-on. Republic is a good idea in theory, but in reality it just gets kidnapped by the plutocracy.

If democracy really is so great, then why are Western governments consistently pushing policies that majority of their population is opposed to? Do try to answer that.

And do absolutely nothing with it. The only difference between USA and Russia is that USA are better at hiding the fact that they are a dictatorship... and dictator(s) are not out in the open. That is not a good thing.

I'm not certain Communism actually did more of it. And if it did, that lead ain't remaining for long... In crueler manner, definitely... but that alone actually makes Communism less bad than Progressivism, as it is more difficult to fool people that Communism is good. Same reason why Communism...

Eastern Europe survived Communism. Sure, it devastated us, but we survived. Modern-day leftism looks to be a far greater threat than what Communism was. Sure, Communists did everything you noted. But for all their faults and evil, most of them at least wanted to construct something new, even if...

Above meme has nothing to do with Communism. And yes, Nazis murdered dissidents and undesirables. Consequence of diversity however is just wanton aimless destruction that cannot even be predicted because unlike Nazis, there is no logic behind their evil. As for Nazism vs Communism, my comment...

Progressivism is worse than Communism which is worse than Nazism. Theoretically great evil is less evil than a middling evil that is actually successful at achieving its goals.