Search results for query: *
- Users: ATP
- With WI no Gallipoli or substitute, Ottomans attacked from edges only from beginning of WWI? thread
- Content: Threads, Posts
- Order by date
-
A
WI no Gallipoli or substitute, Ottomans attacked from edges only from beginning of WWI?
But,if they made both cluster-fucks at the same time...turks could still break.If not,russian army would be less spend fighting turks then they were after attacking germans,so maybe they would not break in 1917.- Word Count: 39
- ATP
- Post #6
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
A
WI no Gallipoli or substitute, Ottomans attacked from edges only from beginning of WWI?
You have a point,but if Russia want it only where their fleet was ready...Maybe they would wait till 1916,and Brusilow offensive would be against turks?- Word Count: 28
- ATP
- Post #4
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
A
WI no Gallipoli or substitute, Ottomans attacked from edges only from beginning of WWI?
Notching really change - brits send more people to Palestine,but turks would do the same. Only possible difference - without Dardanelle campaign,Ataturk would never become so famous,so MAYBE he would be unable to take power and defeat Greeks after WW1. Or,maybe not.- Word Count: 44
- ATP
- Post #2
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion