Search results for query: *
- Users: ATP
- With Could Japan have had its carrier decks and carrier wings up to their Nov 1941 levels by Nov '40 or Nov '39 w/ earlier plausible investments? thread
- Content: Threads, Posts
- Order by date
-
A
Could Japan have had its carrier decks and carrier wings up to their Nov 1941 levels by Nov '40 or Nov '39 w/ earlier plausible investments?
Well,then 4 big carriers with 150 planes or more each.- Word Count: 11
- ATP
- Post #7
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
A
Could Japan have had its carrier decks and carrier wings up to their Nov 1941 levels by Nov '40 or Nov '39 w/ earlier plausible investments?
Axe superbattleships.You would get 5 or 6 carriers for the same moneys.- Word Count: 13
- ATP
- Post #5
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion
-
A
Could Japan have had its carrier decks and carrier wings up to their Nov 1941 levels by Nov '40 or Nov '39 w/ earlier plausible investments?
Sadly,no.USA do not cared about murdered chineese,and introduced embargo in 1941 to save soviet asses,not China. Which would happen here,too. Only difference - more carriers for Japan in 1941,which would change little - maybe they win Midway battle in 1942, but lost war later anyway...- Word Count: 75
- ATP
- Post #2
- Forum: Post-1900 Timelines & Discussion