Search results

  1. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    Like @Aldarion said - serf never made succesfull revolutions,only joined them.All slaves/serfs uprisings were crushed. With one posible exception - in 14th century Bulgary peasants made succesfull uprising.I think,i could be wrong. You must ask @Agent23 about that. P.S about 1789 - England...
  2. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    jewish joke - jew was send to war,and say to waifu - do not worry,i would kill few guys and come back home. Waifu: but what if they kill you? Jew: Me? for what? i did nothing wrong!
  3. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    True.We would be happy if modern states treated us as serfs in every country except Moscov and Prussia.
  4. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    I never said that serfdoom was good.In fact,i belive that turning free peasants into serfs was one of reasons why my country collapsed. I only state,that ,althought we were bad,others was still worst.That is all.And remember,that kgbstan and germans now still worshipp their rulers from that...
  5. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    Yet both moscovite and prussian serfs was running to Poland,to become polish serfs.Becouse They still have some rights there,for example,they were judged by other polish serfs from the same village,all landlord could do was safe punished serf and take him to other village. He could not kill...
  6. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    Cossack goal was not be free/they could do that as peasants there/,but robb tatars and turks.That is why alliance between them and Poland was impossible in long run - they need constant war with Ottomans,when we wonted peace. And yes,there was changes in Poland - initially seffs almost do not...
  7. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    Servs in Moscov was slaves,gentry could sell them. Servs in Poland was not,gentry could only sell land.That is why serfs was running from Moscov to Poland in 18th century,and one of the reasons why Partition happened/well,main was becouse our fucking gentry decided,that we do not need army/
  8. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    Kings care about future of state,becouse it would go to his son.President care about next election/or,in case of Clinton,erection/
  9. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    Monarchy - not,absolute monarchy - yes,becouse it created omnipotent state,which could do anything.And such state was taken over by masons,rvolutionists,and other thugs. King should have relativelly small power,just like in medieval times.Strong enough to defend country with people support,but...
  10. A

    General political philosophy discussion

    stripping Royals of power is,in most cases,good thing.Look like Europe ruled by absolute monarchs ended. And about jews - in Poland they have paradise - and,as a result,our towns were weak and economy sucked.England was better without them.
Top