Search results

Yeah, this sounds like he's arguing with some straw creationist who only lives in his head. Even the most die-hard Young Earth Creationists don't deny that Dinosaurs existed, they just think they existed a lot more recently than Evolutionists do.

I tend to agree, I found no serious methodology errors when I examined it either. I too don't see this as proof of the flood (Though I have seen numerous other lines of evidence for it) by itself and I'm not a young earth creationist in the first place, however it is one of several cases...

Yes, posted upthread. Here's a repost of the study's data for your convenience. http://static.icr.org/i/pdf/technical/The-Cause-of-Anomalous-Potassium-Argon-Ages.pdf The issue with "Holocene" is that this just happens to be the entire period for which we have historical evidence and records to...

From the actual study: All samples were sent first for sectioning one thin section from each sample for petrographic analysis. A set of representative pieces from each sample (approximately 100 g) was then despatched to the AMDEL Laboratory in Adelaide, South Australia, for whole-rock major...

Yes, I too have a degree in geology and know what the Calibration Curve is, and also how much fudging and guesswork goes into it. Again, a known volcanic flow from 1954 tested out as being 0.27 million years to 3.5 million years old. Their correcting for such issues is rather faulty. Medicine...

One of the interesting ones is that there was an uttermassive spike in the amount of C-14 in the world in the year 774, known as the Charlemange Event. Nobody's quite sure why though records say a giant glowing cross appeared in the sky around then, and there's theories it was a solar event of...

Since you're so much more knowledgable than him about it, how about you go ahead and show us your numbers instead? No it's not. We've literally already definitively proven the atmosphere they used was completely impossible. There is no possible theoretical atmosphere that can produce the...

People argue DNA because that at least gives Evolution a chance. You literally cannot create the amino acids required for the "reading system" under any theoretical possible atmosphere. Running away from "but Evolution doesn't explain where life came from" is a pedantic trick, much like "We...

That doesn't answer his actual point you quoted at all though, does it? His statement was that even given all the amino acids free, you can't actually get life without beating odds far higher than anything that could possibly be within credulity, even if every atom in the universe were an amino...

Do the wolves you claimed speciated due to behavior get married? Or is there more to mating behavior than where you've moved the goalposts to? Parthenogenesis still requires a fully developed set of sexual organs to create and grow the embryo/egg. It's not some halfway point between sexual and...

Onlyfans. Not related to mating. Unbelievable.

By that standard conservative males and girls with Onlyfans accounts have speciated.

No they aren't. Quit posting fake science. https://socratic.org/questions/why-are-bacteria-so-difficult-to-classify-at-the-species-level Bacteria are among the least stable organisms genetically and change much more rapidly than anything else. They will even borrow genes from each other to...

Holy cow, you don't actually know what sexual reproduction is (Hint: cultivar hybridization is sexual reproduction) and yet you feel qualified to speak on scientific matters of evolution. Not only is it produced sexually, you can save the seeds and re-plant Broccolini. Sure, over a century of...

Yes. That's how you produce Broccolini. Good news then, science has overwhelmingly proven that species never change. A chihuahua is still fertile with a wolf if you get the mechanical aspects out of the way, and that's a massive number of generations and thousands of years to play with their...