Search results

Safari out the RINOs. they are as bad as the democrats and pretend to be allies so they can knife the country while it is down.

I heard she really got ahead of her competition while learning everything she could at the knees of one Willie Brown.

the government deserves no benefit of the doubt. the government asks the companies to do things. the companies do the governments bidding. making them agents of the state and so they should not be used to crush americans 1st ammendment rights. just because the government is operating a step...

if by media you mean all media companies no that isn't what we are talking about. nobody is going to mandate Fox has a certain number of antifa members there and nobody is gonna mandate CNN put patriot front up. that is because they are publishers with an editorial bias. if however you are...

drag shows are fine as long as they aren't targeted at kids. otherwise they should be treated like taking a kid to a strip club. I wouldn't go to one because they are weird and degenerate. but for some that transgressiveness is the appeal of it. like when a 12 year old squeaker in a CoD lobby...

It is a private company doing things at the request of the government. No they shouldn't. there are many restrictions on what private individuals are allowed to do. for instance if they wanted to make a social media version of epstien's island where they could share like and comment on CP it...

I want the government to protect speech. you want the government to be allowed to have back doors to block the speech of dissenters. we are not the same.

I would indeed have the government say that 1st amendment protections apply to all social media than say that social media can be a back door for the government to suppress speech they dislike in violation of the 1st amendment yes.

I agree so long as the government simply asks a social media company nicely to please remove all wrong think there is literally nothing to be done. private entities at the behest of the US government acting on behalf of the US government must be allowed to Censor whoever and whatever the...

If in your mind saying "we shouldn't incentivize companies to ship jobs overseas" and "the government should take less of our money" is the exact same thing as "vote for me I will get rid of your college debt" you got a very skewed view of things.

It would likely take a constitutional amendment to implement so the argument about it not being constitutional kinda doesn't really matter. either it gets to that point or it won't. constitutional amendments are difficult to push through under good conditions. most of what Vivek talks about is...

that traces to a difference in what we call a felony now versus then. felonies used to be things that could be death penalty. used to be things that the founders would say only a dangerous lunatic would do that. now with how many no longer fall into that category we end up in a situation where...

I think everyone forgot how bad he was when he tried running for governor the first time and was pushed over the line by Trump. everyone thinks of him stepping up after he locked down Florida and how awesome it was forgetting that South Dakota never locked down at all. They forget that he was an...

Nah you can talk alot of shit about Vivek. but he does at the very least seem to be sincere and open. he has been doing every show he can answering as many questions as he can and is unafraid to say "I don't know" when that is the genuine answer. Vivek is admittedly the only R candidate other...

I'm going for a black out at this point. I just need a vegen who goes cannibal and a person from the government to make an actual fake alien body to distract the masses.

A socialist stealing luxury products? Inconceivable!

The question isn't which of the US and China is gonna be in for very bad times in the near future because of their shit policies. they both will. The question is more which can recover better and if a 3rd power could rise during that time.