Search results

Federal gun licenses already exist. They don't prevent states from also issuing gun licenses.

Protection orders in general are sussy on due process to me. I'm much prefer the front desk of the police office to have a drawer full of derengers that they can give out to anyone who feels in danger.

There needs to be strict limitation on what can be regulated: The regulation must produce a grantee which prevents a risk The risk must have a greater than 50% chance of causing death or grievous injury The Risk must be of accidental harm All of the above elements must be provable

That isn't the doom scenario. What they are afraid of is someone having the balls to declare a pedophilia emergency and start rounding up school teachers.

I can buy a 20 pounder parrot riffle from Hern Iron works right now. I won't because its 11 grand without the gun carriage, but I can. They also have an 8 inch siege mortar.

That is purely due to a matter of procedure. Also victims of punishment through process will typically lack the resources to do anything about it. They have gone into significant dept to finance their legal defense.

The jury is the first and last line of defense against problematic law. I think we need to give them some additional powers: 1: Legislation to make jury nullification official, with usage report in the legislature. 2: Give them an "Innocent with proprietorial malice" verdict where if they find...

The argument you need to make is that it is ex-post facto because the punishement is not assigned during the sentencing of a trial. There is not legal difference between this and writing a law that says all rapists must be executed, and then rounding up rapists in prisons and released to the...

As long as they can enforce another workaround through the gap to the next supreme court case they consider it a win.

Remember, the historical tradition of firearm regulation was time and place restrictions on the firing of artillery all the way up until jim crow.

The president is the commander and chief of the militia, this means not only can he issue the militia orders, but also that he can issue the militia supplies. This makes any attmepts of law enforcement to stop it military sabatauge.

You didn't even read the rest of my post, where I was elaborating on how.

Honestly, all you need for massive gun control repeals is one good president to go "I am the commander of the United States Militia and fuck you!" A president can sue congress for making the militant impotent, and it will go strait to the supreme court with the issue of military weapons at...

Do to the purpose clause of the second amendment, "dangerous and unusual" should only apply to weapons which the US military recuses to use on those grounds. This means biological and chemical weapons. There are only to military forces directly mentioned in the United States constitution: the...

Basically laws that let law enforcement cease guns for various reasons without the accused actually committing a crime.

That is either insurrection or conspiracy against rights.

The courts loose power if they get rid of red flag laws. Also the courts consider it legal for the FBI to just steel your shit on an accusation, and you never get it back.

the problem is that someone is being served a punishment without a trial and that there is a conflict of interest preventing the courts from correcting it.

The NFA is categorically unconstitutional. Eveery legislatyor that had a hand in it should be executed. Insurrection with conspiracy against rights as a lesser included charge.

Because new York Judges have never been executed for conspiracy against rights. Yes, civil servants can be given the death penalty for violating your constitutional rights. Federal prosecutors just choose not to apply the law.