Search results for query: *

Honestly I don't think it is. Without natural beauty, and many of the other things nature provides, life as in human life will be all the poorer for it. Who wants to live in dingy smoke-choked cities, or industrial wastelands?

Indeed it is, there need not be a choice. There is plenty of overlap between what is good for humanity and what is good for the environment.

Well, there is the fact that living in a healthy environment is conducive to human health as well. Having clean air, clean water, and the such is good for us. That being able to get out into nature is good for us as well, and natural beauty has a soothing effect on the human soul. So I think...

If they really only wanted that, why would they harangue people to cut back and make sacrifices while flying around in private jets, owning multiple homes, engage in conspicuous consumption and generally live it up? If they so believed in it so much, wouldn't they be the first people to actually...