Search results

Eh it probably depends on how much of a nuisance Trump is to them after his term as presidency ends (which tbf knowing Trump he probably will be). If he doesn't cause them too much trouble they'll probably do the same thing they did with Bush and just go "oh he wasn't actually that bad now this...

Are you ok? You're starting to concern me here.

That question is more about current POTUS then former but for the most part yes they are? The position gets away with a lot of things that are of shall we say "questionable legality". If you want one example you can look at Obama drone striking an American by accident while trying to get his...

Welcome to politics where one has the fun job of deciding whether it hurts the nation more or less to do something that would be just. You're free to dislike that and me along with it if you want to but it'll do you no good to get upset about it.

Welcome to actions taken to try and make sure your country runs properly rather then having every president too afraid to ever do anything lest his successor find a way to imprison him for it. Because you know as well as I do it wouldn't end there. And I say that as someone who would find it...

I kinda doubt they're going to arrest Obama even if he did do enough to deserve it, mainly because no one wants to set the precedent for arresting presidents after their term is over for something they did in office.

Amusingly enough Twitter actually tried to hide it from trending for a while when it had some 3.5 million tweets under it. Then Trump retweeted someone who was talking about twitter trying to bury it and it promptly rose back up. And now Twitter has reduced how many tweets are under said hashtag...

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/doj-drops-charges-against-michael-flynn And the case vs Flynn was dismissed with prejudice. It's dead for good.