Search results

I mean generally the first thing you want is control of the security forces so either you fought them or they supported you. The few times where it would not apply would be an internal coup where one group of elites oust another group of elites and the mechanism for control is the same. A coup...

Cherico you seem to be making the common mistake many on the right make where they assume competence of security personnel aka army police etc. When there are changes in regimes sure some types of people can avoid purges but those people have to be rare and hard to replace scientists or good...

It happens in left wing ones and INTELLIGENT right wing ones. Many on the right now are idiots and cucks who worship the current society, or are democrats of 10 years ago.

So what's the story behind that football video?

Well if the person was tied down and the shooter had no way to miss but instead of going for the head or chest went for their kneecaps or something to hurt them that could be argued that is not attempted murder. Anyway with dogs they are loyal so if you are going to put down the person who has...

Thats part of the reason I don’t view dogs as mere tools. They are living things, lesser than humans but still living and they can be good and bad.

Before I respond I need to know is the support for the death penalty because it’s a cop abusing his authority or should also random people who sic a dog on another person get the death sentence?

Didn’t you say the cop should be put down? Now you are saying force the cop to put down an animal is cruel and unusual?

Well part of the punishment would be forcing the officer who is at fault to put down his dog. After all it’s just a tool but it holds sentimental value so there is that.

If an animal hurts a human for ANY reason and it’s not justified self defense OR a valid LEGAL order the animal should be put down.

The first sentence said I don’t know why you are so invested in police dogs as opposed to normal dogs. The next sentence if a dog was trained LIKE a police dog to be aggressive and attack on order it would be put down if it was an illegal attack. As for your last sentence maybe but that’s not...

Are you dense or not understanding what I’m saying. If you as a private individual decided to get a German shepherd and then train it just like a police dog and then you as a private citizen decided to sit your dog on me unjustly. Then after you are arrested your dog would be put down. I don’t...

Dogs still have training they will react if their handler is killed. Honestly an animal hurting a human that was not supposed to be hurt needs to be put down. I don’t know why you are so invested in police doggos. I mean if a dog was trained like a police dog and was siced on someone they’d put...

No animals that kill or abuse humans without being trained to do it need to be put down. That dog now could be more aggressive towards people who it should not be aggressive towards. There is a reason we hunt down man eaters, also people are protective of their pet animals the cops being forced...

The officers involved should be forced to kill the dog before being fired.

I'm going to respond to number 4 because it is most important. Maybe then we should reject the retarded political legal system we built. Common law is retarded and English tradition sucks, allowing people to just keep suing each other was a mistake. Make it so that people who bring any lawsuits...

Why should they have more protection than regular people being sued by bad actors? Also no they don’t need qualified immunity, the police unions propbably have clauses where the state pays for cops legal defense.

Stuff like this will keep happening until police start facing personal consequences and people know that they personally are treated as criminals.

What exactly is a tyranny to you? Right now the courts have too much power because of money. Could obergefel happen or other political decisions like roe v wade if private lawyers couldn’t make tons of money paid by special interests to argue for those interests that are against the common good...

I would rather we have openly biased judges than those who hide like they do now. If your judges are prejudiced you have a problem but better it be open so that it can be fixed by n appeal or the judge removed instead of secret and unknown where the judge stays there doing continuous damage.