Search results

It depends on the details. If your honeypot says 'What do you think about X?' and lets them lead the conversation, that's not an issue. If they start with 'Gosh, isn't X so awful, terrible, horrible, bigoted, don't you agree?' and trying to cajole the target into agreeing, that's something more...

Care to tell us anything about this link?

If that person's speculation that Trump knew about what they were up to for years is correct, we have one of the largest cases of 'never interrupt your enemy when they are making a mistake' in politics ever. Revealing all of this in the lead up to the 2020 election is a hell of an 'October...

I don't like it. I really don't like it. But. If every single subordinate involved in this horrific attempt to destroy the republic can get nailed to the wall, I'll take it. If it can be made 100% clear that if you follow the directives (explicit or implied) of the President to commit gross...

Watergate was chump change compared to this. Watergate was about party operatives breaking in to the other party's files and the like, then government officials trying to cover that up. This is about government officials knowingly creating false charges, hiding exculpatory evidence, and trying...

It's very notable that until Strzok got involved, they were going to close the investigation as having found nothing. So, there are at least some people at Washington's FBI branch still trying to just do their jobs.