Search results

@The Name of Love I can't help but notice that it's been a month and you still haven't responded to any of this. I thought you said you were, and I quote, "specialize[d] in history, politics, philosophy, and Christian apologetics" while you were shitting up this forum and others with your inane...

Mathematics is logic, and mathematics has proven that the notion that all sets can be represented as an ordinal is a logical contradiction--it cannot be true. Cantor's diagonal argument proved this over a century ago. So your notion that if god had parts, then those parts would be prior to it is...

Actually, upon reading your essay a second time, I've come to the realization that all the points I previously made don't fully capture the extent to which your argument is incorrect--its primary problem is even more fundamental than I previously suggested. One can disprove the entirety of your...

My god, I thought I was dealing with a reactionary but it turns out I’m dealing with something even worse—an amateur metaphysician. This is a fundamental misunderstanding of Dennett—Dennett does not deny that consciousness exists, only that qualia do not in the typical sense in which they are...

Biologists do not postulate variation between mammals with regards to breathing air with lungs because no mammals breathing air with lungs have been observed. Were we to discover an example of a mammal (that is to say, a biological organism cladistically descended from the common ancestor that...