Search results

Stupid peons your betters will tell you what liberties you are entitled too. Now if you would just pay this brib…..we tax, you can have your liberties back. ( unless we deem your ungood).

Like many legal regulations of today, they violate the principle of” innocent until proven guilty”. Restrictions on weapons because of safety amount to “ You dirty peons have no agency so you must pay for the franchise to have them” Example FFA tax stamps with $200 tax to apply for automatic...

Another good point, the special carve out for police, judges and wardens should apply to everyone who has not lost their liberties due to criminal behavior/ mental/ etc. It does however highlight the utter lack of logic in gun policy and the illegal state franchise of those rights...

I can see your point for everything you wrote. And all valid concerns. My feelings on 2A are very f you’re not on probation, not mental or medically unfit, not doing illegal drugs, you are free to own carry what you want up to crew served weapons……. My issue is states like Michigan, LEO...

I always thought the MG registry and CCL should be automatic given for anyone with a good conduct discharge from military or currently serving active/reserve/NatGuard. It would also force the military to do better weapons training for non-combat arms (NCA) pax. Lord knows some of the NCA...

……More power in fewer hands means easier to control, coerce, corrupt, bribe, blackmail, and spin. As for Not enough to upset the cart from how it is, logic may say keeping the 9th court covering the same area as 4 other courts appears rather incompetent. Sorry, I miss spoke incompetent...

Courts ruled regulations do not apply to individuals, Rodrigez<sp> v. Board of Labor. Regulations apply to Government and legal fiction persons aka. Corporations. Although it is outright ignored and applied to individuals constantly.….. Like the 2nd amendment and 10th amendment.

“The Bureaucracy must expand to support the Bureaucracy”….. with 5x the corruption and graft. Except it is now not illegal to operate in a manner that would cause charges, fines, and jail time for a person or company. Until FDR came along the federal government followed the Constitution...

The NFA is a joke from a constitutional perspective, only political shenanigans allowed it to go forward, and the courts ignoring any case that comes close to ruling on it are keeping it on life support. That also goes to the area of the ATF, a bureaucratic institution with legislative...

USA v. Miller the SCOTUS said you could ban shotguns with short barrels because they had no military use ( while wrong WWI trench guns became common), while completely ignoring the militarily usefulness of automatic weapons. Not surprising as it was the only Supreme Court case I know of that...

Tariff is for external use on foreign importers as far as I know. Equal protection of the law, should not all businesses need to pay regulation commissars to be present when business is conducted?

No issue with inspections, issue with paying for the inspections. That is what taxes are for, different if it was foreign flagged ships. If you pay taxes, then the government wants you to pay again to do its job?

Thanks for moving my post to the appropriate thread.

This is an interesting case that may have a secondary and tertiary blast radius for the federal government, and the unconstitutional use of Federal Administrative Agencies. (FAA) FFA have been given power of the legislative, executive, and judicial branches. All this power in the hands of...

No, it has nothing to do with not realizing what they are doing. It is about time / money analysis. Every new law has to be challenged by someone that on a case that has merit. You need to have money to fight a multi year legal battle. You have to win, and some jurisdictions the judges...

I would argue that SCOTUS is incapable of determining constitutionality as they pick what case they want to look at. With no requirements to judge obvious unconstitutional laws. Or Example US v. Miller picked such a narrow interpretation of the law it ignores the aspects of the Firearms act...

That is not what I read on the federalist papers. Tyranny of a judiciary is still tyranny. The SCOTUS job was to judge high crimes and determine if laws are constitutional. Something that is suspect historically. Example Miller v. US, the only case before SCOTUS that was tried without a...

Bull-Pucky, it is or it is not unconstitutional, any law that is unconstitutional is “VOID”, per that old white guy who helped draft the constitution. What would he know?

From Cannonshop "If you have to ask permission, then it's no longer a Right, it has been turned into a Privilege-something that can be and will be taken from you when convenient." Pretty much sums up the Bill of Rights and if it is dead.

Except the Miller case was “legal” because sawed-off shotgun was deemed not military useful, which allowed the tax to stay in place. While the court ignored the military useful automatic weapon tax and SBR tax. Funny that.